Skip to content

Cohort Study of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring of Chemoembolization

Cohort Study of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring of Chemoembolization

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05390112
Acronym
Mona-Lisa
Enrollment
167
Registered
2022-05-25
Start date
2021-05-20
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Circulating Tumor DNA, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable, Transarterial Chemoembolization

Keywords

cell-free DNA; circulating tumor DNA; hepatocellular carcinoma;

Brief summary

Cohort study to assess the impact of ctDNA detection in the follow-up and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by TACE

Detailed description

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased significantly over the past 30 years. The majority of HCCs present at an intermediate stage, ineligible for a curative surgical approach and the reference treatment in this situation corresponds to a palliative locoregional treatment of Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This treatment modality can be repeated several times and the interval between each session as well as the modalities to evaluate the efficacy of this procedure remain poorly codified. This evaluation is currently based on imaging performed at one month (M1) (MRI and/or CT scan) more or less associated with the study of the variation of the alphafetoprotein level measured before (baseline) and after (M1) the treatment. However, these evaluation tools have many limitations and remain imperfect in predicting response to treatment. In this context, liquid biopsy, which is experiencing significant growth in oncology, could be a promising tool. It is characterized by the detection of tumor elements in the bloodstream such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Several studies have successfully demonstrated the diagnostic or prognostic value of ctDNA in patients followed for HCC. the aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of ctDNA detection in the follow-up of patients treated by TACE.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALDNA

ctDNA; cfDNA

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * HCC diagnosed on consensus radiological criteria in cirrhotic patients (EASL-EORTC 2012): helical CT or MRI with triple arterial, portal, and late acquisition. The diagnosis is based on the presence of hypervascularization at the early arterial time (wash-in) with wash-out (hypodensity or hypointensity compared with non-tumor liver parenchyma) at the portal phase or late phase compared with non-tumor parenchyma. * Histologically diagnosed HCC in the absence of an imaging diagnosis * Patient with a first TACE (naive) or not, regardless of the number of previous procedures * Patient naïve or on a new line of oncological treatment, regardless of the number of previous lines of treatment. * Treatment decision validated by the digestive oncology staff. * Patient having read and understood the information letter and signed the informed consent. * Patient follow-up performed at the Charles Nicolle University Hospital in Rouen.

Exclusion criteria

: * Other active cancer or hematological malignancy, currently being treated * Patient not affiliated to the social security system * Pregnant woman or woman in labour or breastfeeding * Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision * Person placed under court protection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiological response at 1 month according to mRECIST and ctDNA detection4 to 6 weeksradiological response : mRECIST (progressive disease; stable disease, partial response, complete response) LIRADS (LR-TR Nonviable, LR-TR Equivocal, LR-TR Viable); ctDNA at 1 month detection (yes or no)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival and overall survival4 to 6 weeksprogression-free Survival and overall Survival (months)

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactVincent VERDIER, MD
vincent.verdier@chu-rouen.fr+33 2 32 88 86 10

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026