Skip to content

Anoplasty for Post Hemorroidectomy Anal Stenosis : Diamond Versus V-Y Flap Techniques

Anoplasty for Post Hemorroidectomy Anal Stenosis : Diamond Versus V-Y Flap Techniques

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05389475
Enrollment
52
Registered
2022-05-25
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2022-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anoplasty in Treatment of Post Hemorroidectomy Anal Stenosis

Brief summary

The aim of the study to evaluate the outcome of diamond flap versus V-Y flap for treatment of severe post hemorroidectomy anal stenosis .

Detailed description

Anal stenosis is diagnosed when there is a narrowing of the anal canal and subsequent loss of normal elasticity that makes its wall rigid and unable to be dilated to permit normal pain-free defecation(1). The underlying pathology of anal stenosis results from a wide variety of either functional or anatomical causes . In functional anal stenosis, the presence of a hypertonic internal anal sphincter is the major cause of the narrowing, whereas in anatomical anal stenosis, the normal elastic anoderm replaced by an inelastic rigid fibrous tissue is the major cause of the anal canal narrowing(2). The best way of treatment of anal stenosis is avoiding its occurrence, as the major cause is following surgical hemorrhoidectomy, particularly when a large area of anoderm lining the anal canal is removed during the operation, but can also complicates other anorectal surgical operations(3). The patient usually experiences painful defecation, incomplete evacuation, pellet stool, or rectal bleeding. These manifestations force the patient to rely on daily laxatives or enemas in bowel evacuation(1). Usually physical examination is all that is needed to confirm the diagnosis of anal stenosis, including inspection of the anal canal, perianal skin, and digital rectal examination\]. Anatomical anal stenosis can be classified according to Milsom and Mazie (4) based on the severity of the anal canal narrowing into mild anal stenosis, when the anal canal can be examined by a well-lubricated index finger or a medium-sized Hill-Ferguson retractor; moderate anal stenosis, when forceful dilatation is required to insert either the index finger or a medium-sized Hill-Ferguson retractor; and severe anal stenosis, when neither the little finger nor a small-sized Hill-Ferguson retractor can be inserted. In most patients with mild to moderate anal stenosis, medical management with stool softeners or fiber supplements , emollient laxatives , high fiber diet to help softener of stool and make it pass easily would be a choice(5). However, different surgical procedures are reserved for patients with severe anal stenosis and in case of failed medical treatment. The choice of the most appropriate procedure is based on the severity where lateral sphincterotomy could be sufficient for a patient with a mild and sometimes moderate degree of anal stenosis after failure of medical treatment(6). However, various flap anoplasty procedures should be reserved for the more severe cases to replace the cicatrized tissues The aim of various techniques of anoplasty is to restore the normal function of the narrowed anal canal by dividing the stricture, and this leads to widening of the anal canal while preserving the anal continence and thus pain-free bowel evacuation(7). Prevention The best treatment for anal stenosis after hemorrhoidectomy is a meticulous approach in the operating room during the primary operation. The risk of anal stenosis increases with the complexity and extent of the hemorrhoids treated. Surgical therapy of extensive and complicated hemorrhoids should only be approached by surgeons experienced in this operation. The keys to prevention of anal stenosis after hemorrhoidectomy are meticulous submucosal dissection with avoidance of injury to the internal sphincter muscle and the preservation of sufficient intact anoderm between excision sites, generally considered at least 1 cm of intact intervening anoderm. Additionally, limiting the number of hemorrhoids excised in a given setting will also help to limit the incidence of postoperative stenosis. Nonoperative Intervention The cornerstone of therapy for anal stenosis from all causes is dietary modification, including a combination approach utilizing stool softeners as well as increased fiber intake and water consumption. For many patients with mild stenosis, these simple measures may alleviate the patient's symptoms. For patients not initially responsive to these measures, and those with moderate steno ses, it is reasonable to attempt a course of manual dilation in addition to the above measures. This program consists of an initial dilation in the operating room or clinic, if tolerated, followed by serial dilations at home by the patient using either a finger or a dilator. This can be facilitated and better tolerated through the use of anesthetic jelly (e.g., lidocaine 2%). The majority of patients with mild stenosis will achieve symptom alleviation with this approach, as will many patients with moderate stenosis. Manual dilation does have some risks, such as perforation, but these risks are low Surgical methods in treatment of anal stenosis contain: 1. Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy 2. Lateral Mucosal Advancement Flap 3. V-Y Advancement Flap 4. Diamond-Shaped Flap 5. House Flap 6. U-shaped Flap

Interventions

PROCEDUREanoplasty in treatment of post hemorroidectomy anal stenosis

Diamond flap versus V-Y flap

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with post-surgical severe anal stenosis based on Milsom and Mazier classification after the failure of non-operative measures were included.

Exclusion criteria

* (1) Patients with functional stenosis as acute anal fissure. (2) Patients with a recent history of anal stenosis who had no medical treatment trial. (3) Patients with mild or moderate anal stenosis who expected to respond to medical treatment. (4) Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, tuberculosis, or perianal fistula. (5) Patients with previous radiotherapy or previous anal malignancy. (6) Patients with previous anoplasty.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
comparison between outcomes of Diamond flap versus V-Y flap in treatment of anal stenosis post hemorroidectomy3 monthsPostoperative complication as anal pain , bleeding , infection , healing , incontinence

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactOmar Mohamed Mokbel, Master
omarmokbel1995@gmail.com01025104556
Backup ContactMomen Shalqamy, PhD
Moamen.shalkamy@aun.edu.eg01017520093

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026