Skip to content

Internal Discourses and Perception of Trail-running Effort

The Effect of Internal Discourses on the Perception of Trail-running Effort

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05389111
Acronym
UT4M2022
Enrollment
76
Registered
2022-05-24
Start date
2023-05-15
Completion date
2025-07-25
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Exertion

Brief summary

Determination of the effect of an intervention to develop the use of internal discourses on the perception of exercise during a sub-maximum effort following a trail running

Detailed description

The practice of mountain running or trail is in full development in France and elsewhere in the world. This sport practice is associated with various constraints specific to the activity. These constraints imposed on the body during the preparation, participation and recovery of this type of effort have an impact on multiple aspects of the individual (physiological, psychological, neurological...). Some studies have made it possible in each of the fields to advance the current knowledge about the trail-running environment. However, there are very few links between variables from different fields of research, even though these links are at the origin of the complex individual responses observed in the field. Therefore it seems important to study the practice of trail running and its consequences on the individual, relying on a systemic approach of the individual who studies how psychological phenomena, physiological and cerebral interactions to predict behaviour and its health consequences. The biopsychosocial models are based on this systemic approach and postulate that the perception of the individual's effort would be the main limit to the continuity of effort, performance because it causes the intensity to decrease - or even stop the effort - if this sensation becomes too strong. Consequently, the study of certain interventions aimed at reducing this perception of effort, such as the one proposed in this project, seems to be an essential step to propose to the practitioners of this type of sport strategies allowing to practice in a healthy and efficient way.

Interventions

OTHERInternal discourses

This intervention will take place following the randomization performed at the V1 visit. It will be held in videoconference, will be led by a professional of the training field, specialist of the trail activity and trained in the use of mental strategies

OTHERNon internal discourses

This intervention will take place following the randomization performed at the V1 visit. It will be held in videoconference, and will be conducted by a professional of the training field, specialist of the trail activity and coach of mountain guide

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female * 18-55 years * Subjects available in Grenoble before and during the 15 days after the race * Subjects subject to a social security scheme * Subjects able to sign informed consent. * Fluent in French

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiorespiratory, metabolic and neurological conditions * People treated with anxiolytics and/or neuroleptics or ATCD for behavioural disorders * Persons refusing to sign the participation consent * Persons under guardianship * Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of effort during running.1 dayPerception of Borg scale rated effort (0 no effort; 10, maximal effort) while running on a treadmill at sub-maximum intensity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perception of effort depending on running distance18 monthsComparison of the perception of effort (Borg scale rated effort (0 no effort; 10, maximal effort) while running) between subjects according to the distance of running
Link between the individual's physical level and perception of effort18 monthsCorrelation between VO2max assessed during exercise testing in the laboratory and effort perception
Serological library18 monthsComparison of circulating markers (e.g. BDNF, s100, creatine kinase, interleukins, to be defined a posteriori according to the physiological and cerebral effects observed) before and after the race
Psychological profiles of trail-running practitioners18 monthsAssessement of internal discourses use, pre-competitive anxiety, self-determined motivation to practice, achievement goals assessed by a questionnaire
Brain activation during a cognitive task3 monthsChanges in brain oxygenation assessed by NIRS during a cognitive task
Perception of effort, attentional focus, self-efficacy and resources of self-control during a race situation1 dayChange in perception of effort, attentional focus, self-efficacy and self-monitoring resources, assessed by a questionnaire during the race
Recovery kinetics of runners after a trail race.2 weeksChanges in the previous outcomes will be evaluated between the end of the race and 1-2 weeks after the race
Performance on a cognitive task3 monthsPerformance on a cognitive task performed on a computer

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026