Skip to content

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Robot-assisted Spinal Surgery

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Robot-assisted Spinal Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05388383
Enrollment
600
Registered
2022-05-24
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2022-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Economic Problems, Lumbar Spine Degeneration, Surgery

Keywords

robot-assisted, spine surgery, cost-effectiveness

Brief summary

With the change of lifestyle and the aging of the population, the prevalence of Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in my country is increasing year by year, and surgery is one of the main ways to treat LDH. Surgical robots have good application prospects in the surgical treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Studies have shown that orthopedic robot-assisted surgery has less soft tissue damage, small surgical incisions, less bleeding, high safety, and quick postoperative recovery; it reduces the risk of spinal cord and blood vessel damage that may be caused during manual operations; does not require repeated fluoroscopy To determine the position of the nail, reduce the intraoperative radiation by more than 70%, and reduce the risk of patient infection. The current clinical research on robotics technology mainly stays in the aspects of accuracy, effectiveness, and safety. If the technology is promoted in clinical applications, the support of health economics evaluation data is urgently needed. This study hopes to apply robot-assisted technology in LDH surgical treatment through observational research design, evaluate the therapeutic effect and treatment cost of robot-assisted surgery and conventional surgery, focus on health economics evaluation, and provide treatment options for patients and medical care in the health sector. The reasonable allocation of resources and the promotion and application of this technology provide data support.

Detailed description

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital is a pioneer in the research and application of orthopedic robotics in my country. At present, it has completed hundreds of orthopedic surgeries using the Tianji robotic system, and has completed a number of randomized controlled clinical trials, proving that robot-assisted surgery is effective in bone degenerative diseases Safety and accuracy in surgical treatment. Based on this platform, this research hopes to apply robot-assisted technology in the treatment of patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, evaluate the therapeutic effect and treatment cost of robot-assisted surgery and conventional surgery, and focus on health economics evaluation, and provide treatment options for patients and health departments The reasonable allocation of medical resources and the promotion and application of this technology provide data support.

Interventions

DEVICETi-robot

Tianji ROBOT--Orthopedic surgery robot led by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

Sponsors

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnose lumbar degenerative diseases and lumbar fractures * single-level lumbar pedicle screw internal fixation * Sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Multi-level lumbar pedicle screw internal fixation * QCT diagnoses severe osteoporosis (BMD \<60mg/cm3). * Combined with abnormal coagulation function * Combined with serious medical diseases * Spinal cord injury, paraplegia * The doctor or nurse believes that it is not appropriate to enroll patients (such as unable to cooperate in completing the study, unable to communicate effectively, severe mental anxiety, lower limb movement disorders, etc.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
COSTUp to 12 monthsPerioperative cost
Visual Analogue ScaleUp to 12 monthsThe basic method is to use a moving ruler with a length of about 10cm. One side is marked with 10 scales. The two ends are respectively 0 and 10 points. A point of 0 means no pain, and a point of 10 means the most intolerable Severe pain.
Oswestry Disability IndexUp to 12 monthsThe minimum score for each item is 0 points, and the highest score is 5 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of dysfunction; the corresponding scores of the 10 items are accumulated. Calculate the percentage of the highest score (50 points) of the 10 items, which is the Oswestry dysfunction index. The higher the score, the more severe the patient's dysfunction.
modified Japanese orthopaedic association scoreUp to 12 monthsSpinal function scoring method, including limb movement, sensory and bladder function evaluation, a total of 17 points. The higher the score, the better the recovery of spinal cord function.
SF-36(Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36)Up to 12 monthsMedical Outcomes Study S hort-Form 36. There are 8 dimensions to evaluate health-related life quality (HRQOL), which are divided into two categories: physical health and physical health, namely physical function (PF), physical function (RP), physical pain (BP), General health (CH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), emotional function (RE), mental health (MH). The score is between 0-100, a high score indicates a good health.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
operation timeDuring surgeryoperation time
Deviation of screwup to 12 monthsThe deviation between the actual position of screw and the preoperative designed position
blood loseDuring surgeryblood lose
Radiation doseDuring surgeryRadiation dose
Complicationsimmediately after the surgery, up to 12 weeksComplications
Hospital staydays between in and out hospitaltotal hospital stay days

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contactmingxing fan, MD,PHD
van0208@163.com+86-13683360600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026