Skip to content

Examining the Impacts of Fidget Technology on Attention in Children With ADHD

Do Fidget Instruments Enhance Attentional Control and Comprehension in 6-13 Year-olds With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05384717
Enrollment
21
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
2022-04-18
Completion date
2022-09-24
Last updated
2022-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ADHD

Keywords

Fidget technology, ADHD, Children, Developmental Psychology

Brief summary

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the usage of fidget technology and its effects on attention, working memory, and comprehension in children ages 6-13 with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This study aims to examine the implications of fidget usage 2 different measures of attention; attentional control (working memory domain) and comprehension (recall, encoding, and recognition). Participants: 6-13 year-old clients at 3-C Family Services, a private mental health clinic in Cary, NC, with a diagnosis of ADHD (Inattentive, Hyperactive, or combined types). Exclusion criteria: participants with an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) below 70 as estimated by referring 3-C clinical staff, or any history of psychosis. Procedures (methods): This research will use a demographic and background collecting survey to gather relevant data about each participant. Parents will be asked to fill out a baseline ADHD Rating Scale-IV: Home Version (ADHD-RS), to account for their child's symptoms of ADHD over the past 6 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of 2 conditions, an experimental group where participants select a fidget, and a control group where participants are not provided a fidget. Fidget options will include a fidget spinner, pop-it, stress ball, and fidget cube as not all children would benefit from the same type of fidget equally. Participants in the experimental group will then be allowed to practice with and familiarize themselves with the fidget for 1 minute to decrease the attentional drain that the fidget may pose in its initial state. After random assignment to either control or experimental group, participants in each group will then complete the same 2-back version of the N-back Attention Control Task (cognitivefun.net), and a video comprehension multiple choice test. After 3 minutes N-back scores will be recorded including visual correct ratio and visual response time scores. The video comprehension item is adapted from Lee and List, 2019. The video is a Ted Talk titled The Survival of the Sea Turtle ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-KmQ6pGxg4). Items in the multiple choice test will be aggregated to a score of percent correctness for each participant. Participants may request to have questions read to them by the research assistant present.

Interventions

OTHERFidget Device

Fidget spinner, stress ball, pop-it, or fidget cube

OTHERControl group

No intervention

Sponsors

3-C Family Services
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of ADHD

Exclusion criteria

* Psychosis * IQ under 70

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
N-back Visual correct ratioDay 1 (Up to 30 minutes)The N-Back task is a measure of working memory. Participants are presented a sequence of stimuli and must decide if the current stimulus is the same as the one presented two trials ago. Max value= 1, min value =0, higher scores are closer to 1
N-back visual response timeDay 1 (Up to 30 minutes)The N-Back task is a measure of working memory. Participants are presented a sequence of stimuli and must decide if the current stimulus is the same as the one presented two trials ago. The lower the score the better (indicates less time to decide on n-back). For response time measure there is no minimum or maximum.
Number of correct multiple choice responses out of 10Day 1 (Up to 30 minutes)Participants answer 10 multiple choice questions to assess comprehension of Ted Talk video. Multiple choice questions adapted from Lee & List, 2019. Max value= 10, min value = 0. Best possible score = 10, higher scores are better.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ADHD-RS Home Version ScoreDay 1 (Up to 30 minutes)Parents complete a 18 question assessment of child's ADHD symptoms over the past 6 months. Max score= 54, Min score= 0. Higher score indicates more ADHD symptoms.
Parent-reported type of ADHDDay 1 (Up to 30 minutes)Parents indicate the type of ADHD their child presents with. Categorical variable: Inattentive, Hyperactive, or Combined
Type of fidget selectedDay 1 (Up to 30 minutes)4 choices of fidget are available to each participant in the experimental group. Categorical variable- fidget spinner, stress ball, pop-it, or fidget cube

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026