Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer

To Study the Factors Affecting Treatment Responses in Patients With Uterine Cervical Carcinoma Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05384366
Enrollment
33
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2022-03-31
Last updated
2022-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer of the Uterine Cervix, Cervical Cancer, Cervix Cancer

Keywords

cancer, cervix, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, predictors

Brief summary

Cervical cancer represents the second commonest cancer in women worldwide, with 500,000 new cases and 300,000 deaths reported yearly. Among cervical cancer cases, 80% occur in developing countries and about 70% are identified as advanced cancer. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, a locally advanced cervical cancer includes stage IB2 to IIB. Treatment modalities include radical surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) plus radical hysterectomy with or without adjuvant RT, and concomitant chemo radiation. Currently, platinum based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has many advantages: decreasing tumor size making surgery easier with improved rate of complete resection, decreased pelvic recurrence rate significantly, decreasing rate of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis, better brachytherapy distribution, minimal radiation toxicity, and 15% absolute increase of 5-year survival. This study will evaluate various factors i.e. patient related (Age, Menopausal status, HPV, HIV, Comorbidities), Tumor related pathological stages (TNM), grade, lymphovascular perineural invasion, lymph nodes, extranodal extension, tumor margins including radial margin, type of tumor i.e. Adeno vs squamous, mutation profile and Treatment related factors (type of NAC, duration of NAC, no of cycles of NAC).

Detailed description

This is a single group prospective study to evaluate factors affecting treatment responses in uterine cervical carcinoma. All patients who will be receiving NAC followed by surgery will be included and assessed for various defined factors influencing response. Responses will be assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria. 1. All patients of cervical growth will be evaluated. Initial clinical evaluation, biopsy and if positive, HPV DNA status will be done. On confirmation of malignancy further staging will be done by FIGO Classification. Imaging will include contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) abdomen or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pelvis and ultrasound (USG) abdomen. Routine blood investigations, chest X-ray (CXR) and Electrocardiography (ECG) will be done. 2. In recruited patients, 3 cycles of NAC consisting of Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (AUC5) at 21 day intervals were given. 3. Adverse reactions if any were recorded as WHO toxicity grades. 4. Evaluation of response was done after end of 2nd cycle of chemotherapy with clinical examination and Imaging (CT/MRI) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. 5. Response was divided into two groups- 1) Complete/ Partial response 2) Poor response/ Stable disease/ Progressive disease. Patients with Poor response/ stable disease/ progressive disease will undergo concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) while patients with partial/complete response will undergo Wertheim's hysterectomy. 6. After surgery Pathological evaluation will include T, N, M, histological type, Lymphovascular invasion (LVI), Perineural invasion (PNI), Depth of Tumor Invasion, Extra nodal extension (ENE), Grade, (next generation sequencing (NGS)- Mutation Analysis. 7. Post operative external pelvic irradiation was given according to Sedlis criteria in node negative, margin negative, parametria negative cases. 8. Follow up Evaluation was done at 1, 3 & 6 months by clinical examination, Biopsy for any recurrence and Imaging (CECT or MRI pelvis) at 6 months. Follow up was continued every 3 months thereof.

Interventions

DRUGNeoadjuvant chemotherapy

doublet of taxane and carboplatin

Sponsors

Banaras Hindu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix were recruited for assessment of clinical and pathological therapeutic response. Multivariate analysis was conducted to predict the independent predictors of response

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • All patients receiving NACT followed by Surgery/RT and willing to give consent will be included in study * FIGO Stage Ib/ IIa/ IIb * Age more than 18 yrs

Exclusion criteria

* • FIGO Stage Ia/ III/ IV * Patients who received treatment earlier * Pregnant/ lactating women * Second primary cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Response21 days after completion of third cyclesResponse to intervention by RACIST criteria 1.1
Pathological response6 monthsPathological response after evaluation of surgical specimen and pathological staging

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026