Skip to content

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05384041
Acronym
CES-MDD
Enrollment
255
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
2022-04-28
Completion date
2022-10-24
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

MDD, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation, FW-200

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Fisher Wallace Stimulator FW-200 to deliver Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) for the treatment of moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in adults.

Detailed description

This prospective, fully remote, randomized, controlled, triple-blind (subject, Principal Investigator, Sponsor) pivotal study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Fisher Wallace Stimulator FW-200 to deliver Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) for the treatment of moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in adults.

Interventions

DEVICEFisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)

The indicated use in adults (ages 21-65 years) is for 20 minutes twice daily, upon waking for the day and at bedtime. The treatment period of the intervention will have a duration of four weeks.

DEVICEFisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)

The placebo device is designed to provide exactly the same patient experience as the active device; however, the placebo device will not deliver the same frequencies as the active device. The placebo device will provide no therapeutic benefit.

Sponsors

NAMSA
CollaboratorOTHER
Climb Technologies, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Fisher Wallace Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Remote, randomized, decentralized, controlled, triple-blind (subject, Principal Investigator, Sponsor) pivotal investigation.

Intervention model description

Pivotal Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 21-65 years and a resident of the United States of America 2. Meets DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder 3. Baseline BDI-II score between 20 and 63, inclusive (in moderate to severe range) 4. Able to receive packages to their home via United Parcel Service/Fedex/United States Postal Service or other delivery service 5. Willing and able to send and receive study related text messages on an internet capable mobile device throughout the duration of the study 6. Owns and uses a personal, verifiable email address 7. Able to commit to two (2) 20-minute treatment sessions per day for 4 weeks, one treatment upon waking for the day and one treatment before going to bed 8. Willing to abstain from use of recreational drugs, hypnotics, steroids, and/or marijuana products through study completion 9. Willingness to not initiate treatment for a mental health issue during the course of the study 10. Fluent in English 11. Sexually active females of childbearing potential willing to commit to practicing at least one or more of the following methods of contraception during the study: intrauterine device (IUD), barrier method in combination with a spermicide, oral/hormonal contraception, or abstinence 12. In the opinion of the investigator, able to comply with study requirements and complete the study

Exclusion criteria

1. History of suicide attempt or active suicidal ideation with plan or intent in the past 30 days. 2. In the opinion of the investigator, considered high risk of suicide 3. Previous hospitalization or institutionalization for mental health condition within one year of study entry 4. Underwent electronic brain stimulation or neuromodulation within the past one year, including CES, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, and deep brain stimulation 5. Modification of prescription medications that affect the nervous system (e.g., psychotropic medications) within 30 days of study entry 6. Use of recreational drugs, hypnotics, steroids, and/or marijuana products in the past 30 days 7. History of alcohol use disorder or other substance use disorder in the past 12 months 8. Females currently pregnant or planning to conceive during study participation, or unwilling to comply with birth control requirements 9. Known history of heart disease 10. Known history of trigeminal neuralgia 11. Implanted with an electronic device such as a defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, or pacemaker 12. Unstable medical condition including any condition requiring hospitalization or change in treatment in the prior 30 days 13. Legally blind and/or deaf and without in-home care service to assist with study participation 14. Meets M.I.N.I. assessment criteria for, or has been diagnosed with, any of the following: Bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, other specified bipolar and related disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, alcohol use disorder in the past 12 months, substance use disorder (non-alcohol) in the past 12 months, any psychotic disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder), major depressive disorder with psychotic features, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, any cognitive or developmental disorder (e.g., autism, Down's Syndrome), any personality disorder or psychiatric disorder that may interfere with study participation 15. Current participation in another investigational study or participated in an investigational study within the past 30 days 16. In the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with study requirements 17. Any employee, family member, or personal associate of the Sponsor or their designees conducting the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline.Change at week two compared to baseline.The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.Change at weeks one and four compared to baseline.The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.
Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change at weeks one, two, and four compared to baseline.The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item scale covering the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition (DSM-5) for Major Depressive Disorder, with a diagnostic algorithm and score-based assessment of presence and severity of depression. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change at weeks one, two, and four compared to baseline.The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) is a 16-item rating scale that assesses nine criterion symptom domains to diagnose a major depressive episode. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Four weeks following baseline.The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)
The Fisher Wallace Stimulator provides cranial electrotherapy stimulation and is an active device. Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device): The indicated use in adults (ages 21-65 years) is for 20 minutes twice daily, upon waking for the day and at bedtime. The treatment period of the intervention will have a duration of four weeks.
126
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)
The placebo device is designed to provide exactly the same patient experience as the active device; however, the placebo device will not deliver the same frequencies as the active device. The placebo device will provide no therapeutic benefit. Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device): The placebo device is designed to provide exactly the same patient experience as the active device; however, the placebo device will not deliver the same frequencies as the active device. The placebo device will provide no therapeutic benefit.
129
Total255

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Total
Age, Continuous39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47
Baseline Clinical Characteristics
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
33 units on a scale33.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.99
34.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92
Baseline Clinical Characteristics
Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9)
16.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76
16 units on a scale16 units on a scale
Baseline Clinical Characteristics
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR)
16.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.91
16 units on a scale16.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) clinically based categories
Mild (scores 14-19)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) clinically based categories
Minimal (scores 0-13)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) clinically based categories
Moderate (scores 20-28)
44 Participants39 Participants83 Participants
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) clinically based categories
Severe (scores 29-63)
82 Participants90 Participants172 Participants
BMI20.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
20.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
20.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
92 Participants99 Participants191 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
126 participants129 participants255 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
96 Participants89 Participants185 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants40 Participants70 Participants
Use of concurrent anti-depressant medication55 Participants47 Participants102 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1260 / 129
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 12610 / 129
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1260 / 129

Outcome results

Primary

Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline.

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at week two compared to baseline.

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline.16.65 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline.14.36 units on a scale
Comparison: Intent to Treat analysesp-value: 0.056Regression, Linear
Secondary

Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Four weeks following baseline.

Population: Intent-to-treat analysis

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 1 ResponseYes46 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 1 ResponseNo80 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 2 ResponseYes64 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 2 ResponseNo62 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 4 ResponseYes82 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 4 ResponseNo44 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 4 ResponseYes68 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 1 ResponseYes38 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 2 ResponseNo74 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 1 ResponseNo91 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 4 ResponseNo61 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) Responder Rate by Time Point (% of Subjects With a 50% or Better Improvement in Score From Baseline).Week 2 ResponseYes55 Participants
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.231Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.192Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.045Chi-squared
Secondary

Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at weeks one and four compared to baseline.

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in BDI-II at Week 1 (ITT analysis)14.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.93
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in BDI-II at Week 4 (ITT analysis)19.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.91
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in BDI-II at Week 1 (ITT analysis)11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.68
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in BDI-II at Week 4 (ITT analysis)16.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.46
Comparison: Difference (Active - Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.048t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item scale covering the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition (DSM-5) for Major Depressive Disorder, with a diagnostic algorithm and score-based assessment of presence and severity of depression. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Change at weeks one, two, and four compared to baseline.

Population: Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 15.27 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 27.46 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 48.88 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 14.50 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 26.29 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in PHQ-9 at Week 47.72 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.2595t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.1286t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.1449t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) is a 16-item rating scale that assesses nine criterion symptom domains to diagnose a major depressive episode. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Change at weeks one, two, and four compared to baseline.

Population: Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 15.53 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 26.72 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 47.99 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 14.77 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 25.71 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) at Weeks One, Two, and Four Compared to Baseline.Change in QIDS-SR at Week 46.90 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.2065t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.1349t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.1142t-test, 2 sided
Post Hoc

Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at weeks 1, 2, and 4 compared to baseline

Population: Intent to Treat population (N = 255)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 217.9 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 115 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 421.2 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 110.6 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 214.2 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 417.1 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 112.9 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 419.2 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 216.1 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 212.6 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 415.6 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 111.5 units on a scale
Male (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 113.6 units on a scale
Male (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 214.8 units on a scale
Male (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 416.5 units on a scale
Total (Males)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 416.1 units on a scale
Total (Males)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 112.7 units on a scale
Total (Males)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (ITT Analysis)Week 213.9 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.0026Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.4706Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.0197Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.4858Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.0183Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.7885Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at weeks 1, 2, and 4 compared to baseline

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-15.22 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-21.53 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-18.23 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-9.79 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-17.04 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-13.76 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-15.53 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-14.27 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-17.92 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-12.47 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-15.25 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in BDI-II From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-13.49 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.45Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.008Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.438Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.016Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.355Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item scale covering the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th Edition (DSM-5) for Major Depressive Disorder, with a diagnostic algorithm and score-based assessment of presence and severity of depression. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Change at weeks 1, 2, and 4 compared to baseline

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-5.42 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-9.48 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-7.84 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-3.82 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-8.32 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-6.12 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-8.00 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-6.13 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-8.80 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-4.97 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-6.77 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in PHQ-9 From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-5.85 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.046Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.351Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.053Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.12Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.17Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.122Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR) is a 16-item rating scale that assesses nine criterion symptom domains to diagnose a major depressive episode. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: Change at weeks 1, 2, and 4 compared to baseline

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-5.79 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-8.53 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-7.46 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-4.33 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-7.45 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-5.52 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-6.52 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-5.91 units on a scale
Total (Female)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-8.21 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 1-5.55 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 4-6.40 units on a scale
Male (Active Device)Change in QIDS From Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, and 4, Stratified by Gender (Per Protocol Analysis)Week 2-5.31 units on a scale
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.173Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.044Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.751Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.013Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.318Regression, Linear
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.142Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at weeks one and four compared to baseline.

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).Change in BDI-II at Week 1 (Per protocol analysis)14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).Change in BDI-II at Week 4 (Per protocol analysis)20.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.87
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).Change in BDI-II at Week 1 (Per protocol analysis)11.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.09
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Weeks One and Four Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).Change in BDI-II at Week 4 (Per protocol analysis)16.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.47
Post Hoc

Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Change at week two compared to baseline.

Population: Per protocol (PP) population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).17.15 units on a scale
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Change in the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) at Week Two Compared to Baseline (Per Protocol).13.62 units on a scale
p-value: 0.005Regression, Linear
Post Hoc

Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, and 4 following baseline

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 137 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 468 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 252 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 120 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 447 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 235 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 212 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 19 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 414 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 118 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 421 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (ITT Analyses)Week 220 Participants
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.026Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.241Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.059Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.478Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.009Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.729Chi-squared
Post Hoc

Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)

The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) is a multiple-choice self-report inventory that assesses severity of depression. The BDI-II contains 21 items on a 4-point scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 3 (severe symptoms). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 63, with a higher score indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The candidate subject's BDI-II score must be within the range of 20 to 63 indicating moderate to severe Major Depressive Disorder.

Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, and 4 following baseline

Population: Per protocol population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 241 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 130 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 456 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 224 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 112 Participants
Fisher Wallace Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulator (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 436 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 211 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 19 Participants
Total (Female)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 412 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 217 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 115 Participants
Male (Active Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 418 Participants
Male (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 252 Participants
Male (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 139 Participants
Male (Placebo Device)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 468 Participants
Total (Males)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 127 Participants
Total (Males)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 454 Participants
Total (Males)Subgroup Analysis - Proportion of Subjects Achieving at Least 50% Improvement From Baseline in BDI-II (Per Protocol Analyses)Week 241 Participants
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.044Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.067Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.016Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.006Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.036Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.016Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 1p-value: 0.914Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 2p-value: 0.887Chi-squared
Comparison: Difference (Active-Control) at Week 4p-value: 0.791Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026