Skip to content

Learning-curve-based Simulation Training for Bronchoscopic Intubation

The Effect on Bronchoscopic-guided Intubation Time in Patients of Learning-curve-based Simulation Training Modality v.s. Fixed-training-time Simulation Training Modality: a Noninferiority Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05383729
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
2022-05-25
Completion date
2022-08-26
Last updated
2022-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flexible Bronchoscopy, Intubation Time, Simulation Training

Brief summary

This study aims to determine whether a new learning-curve-based simulation training modality could contribute to a noninferiority regarding bronchoscopic-guided intubation time in patients compared with the reference fixed-training-time simulation training modality, albeit with less training time.

Detailed description

Questions remain concerning the optimal duration of simulator training for flexible optical bronchoscopic (FOB) intubation. The investigators' previous study demonstrated that an exponential curve could fit the learning curve of FOB intubation training on a high-fidelity simulator after logarithmical transformation of the procedure time. In brief, trainees could achieve a plateau of the learning curve after several procedures, i.e., further training might provide only negligible progress. According to the investigators' preliminary study, the training time for the majority might be less than one hour which is the dominant duration of simulator training in previous studies. By generating a learning curve from the initial several procedures on a simulator, it is possible to predict when a trainee could grow saturated individually. It is hypothesized that this new learning-curve-based training modality could contribute to non-inferior FOB intubation time in patients compared with the reference fixed-training-time (1 hour) training modality, albeit with less training time. The noninferiority margin is defined according to the reported FOB intubation time and the training effect in previous studies. Moreover, it is plausible that this new training modality might even present a higher success rate and better performance of FOB intubation, considering each trainee following the new training has to achieve the individual goal that precludes an outlier from failing to have enough training that might occur in reference fixed-training-time training.

Interventions

OTHERlearning-curve-based training modality

It is an individual duration of simulation training that is based on the previous performance of FOB on a simulator.

OTHERfixed-training-time training modality

It is a training duration of 1 hour which is the dominant duration of simulator training in previous studies.\[1\]

Sponsors

Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The group assignments will be concealed from the collectors who will record the intubation data in patients. Anonymized recordings will be sent to an independent assessor who assesses the performance of FOB intubation in patients.

Intervention model description

This is a multiple-center, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. anesthesia residents or interns at Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China or Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Lhasa, Tibet, China; 2. have performed less than five FOB intubations in patients; 3. consent to this study. -

Exclusion criteria

Those who have received standardized training will be excluded. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to complete FOB intubationJust after the completion of the intubation, in one minuteIt is a noninferiority outcome. After training, one FOB intubation will be performed within one week. Patients scheduled for elective surgery which requires tracheal intubation will be included. Those with an anticipated or known difficult airway or American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Status Classification equaling or exceeding III will be excluded. General anesthesia is performed by the attending anesthetists who does not involve in this study. Patients are mask ventilated for 2min after induction. Assistance with jaw thrust is provided during intubation. Criteria for termination of intubation are SpO 2 of 90% or less, airway tissue trauma during the intubation attempt, attempt time exceeding 4min, or the anesthetist in the charge being unwilling to continue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
duration of the trainingFrom the training initiating to its ending, a sum will be calculated in 24 hours after the trainingThe total duration of the simulation training on a high-fidelity simulator
total number of procedures on the simulatorsFrom the training initiating to its ending, a sum will be calculated in 24 hours after the trainingThe total number of procedures performing FOB on a high-fidelity simulator
success rate of intubationJust after the completion of the intubation, in one minuteSuccessful intubation in patients
performance of FOB intubation on simulatorsAfter the training, the scores will be acquired from the data storage of the simulators in 24 hoursThe last 3 intubations on simulators will be assessed. The simulator assesses the performance based on the validated five-point global rating scale (GRS) of fiberoptic bronchoscope manipulation, which is standardized to a 100-scale score (0=worst, 100=best) automatically by the simulators.
performance of FOB intubation in patientsOne weekThe intubation will be recorded and sent to an assessor, who will assess the performance using the five-point global rating scale (GRS, 8 items, 5 points each, up to a total of 40 points, 0=worst, 40=best) of fiberoptic bronchoscope manipulation in one week. To unify the results, the GRS will be standardized to a 100-scale score (0=worst, 100=best) in the analysis.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026