Skip to content

Effects of Electrotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, Motion and Disability in Adults With Neck or Upper Body Pain.

Effects of Electrotherapy on Cervical Spine Proprioception, Pain, Anxiety, and Disability in Adults With Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05382039
Enrollment
45
Registered
2022-05-19
Start date
2023-02-03
Completion date
2023-03-17
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Neck, upper quadrant, upper body, chronic pain, sub-clinical pain, mild pain

Brief summary

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial with sixty adults, 20 to 40 years of age. There will be three groups as follows: the normal group, control group, and intervention group where subjects will receive instructions for home use of TENS for pain reduction. The aim is for an equal distribution of males and females in each group.

Detailed description

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial with sixty adults, 20 to 40 years of age. There will be three groups as follows: twenty subjects with no pain in the normal group; forty subjects with chronic subclinical neck or upper quadrant pain will be randomized into two groups: twenty subjects in the control group, and twenty subjects in the intervention group. The aim is for an equal distribution of males and females in each group. Data will be collected for each subject using the NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System, the visual analog scale (VAS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Neck Disability Index (NDI); all assessments will be made by a clinician. Normal group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one and post assessments on day eight and on day thirty. Control group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one and post assessments on day eight and on day thirty. Intervention group (20 subjects): Initial assessment on day one pre-intervention and post-intervention assessment of high-frequency sensory TENS (gate control theory of pain) for thirty minutes followed by post-assessments in day eight and day thirty. The intervention group will receive a thirty-minute high frequency TENS (gate control theory of pain) once a day for seven days and twenty-one days after the initial seven days to measure immediate and short-term effects on the dependent variables further described below. Subjects will be educated on TENS usage by a licensed physical therapist. A daily log will be given to all subjects in the intervention group to assure compliance with treatment. In addition, the TENS device will keep track of date, time and day of usage, and TENS parameters.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation

High frequency sensory transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for Subjects without Pain Group: * \> 19 and \<41 years of age * Currently enrolled as students at Loma Linda University. * No pain

Exclusion criteria

for Control Group: * Neck and/or upper quadrant pain * \<20 years or \>40 years of age Inclusion Criteria for Subjects with Pain Groups: * \>19 and \<41 years of age * Currently enrolled as students at Loma Linda University * No acute pain * With neck and/or upper quadrant chronic pain * With \<5/10 pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant PainChange between baseline and two weeks from time of enrollmentAssessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is a subjective measure of pain intensity consisting of a 10 centimeter (cm) line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and extreme pain on the right. Pain scores will be determined by measuring the distance in cm from no pain or 0 cm to the participant's anchor point.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck ProprioceptionBaselineMeasurements assessed with NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System that is a composite measurement through an instrument that utilizes inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure angles of motion in joints via sensors place on the head and neck. This system will measure cervical spine proprioception utilizing the joint position error (JPE) test by indicating the ability of a blindfolded subject to accurately reposition their head back to a predetermined neutral point after head movement.
Level of AnxietyChange between baseline and two weeks post-enrollmentAssessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-form Y (STAI) which is a definitive clinical composite measure of state and trait anxiety in adults. Form Y has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety which will indicate how the subject feels right now/at this moment and how the subject generally feels. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from Almost Never to Almost Always) for a potential total of 80 points. A score of zero points represents no anxiety. A score of 80 points represents severe anxiety.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Subjects Without Pain
This group included twenty participants with no neck and/or upper quadrant pain that did not receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment.
16
Subjects With Pain and No Intervention
This group included twelve participants with neck and/or upper quadrant pain that did not receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment.
12
Subjects With Pain and Intervention
This group included eleven participants with neck and/or upper quadrant pain that did receive transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: High frequency sensory transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
10
Total38

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyOne subject unable to return for reassessment as required by protocol timeline.001
Overall StudyScore on pain scale was not zero. Subjects randomized to this arm had to have zero pain.500
Overall Studywaiting for confirmation001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSubjects With Pain and No InterventionSubjects With Pain and InterventionSubjects Without Pain
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants12 Participants10 Participants16 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
38 participants12 participants10 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants11 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 120 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 120 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 120 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Decrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain

Assessed with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is a subjective measure of pain intensity consisting of a 10 centimeter (cm) line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and extreme pain on the right. Pain scores will be determined by measuring the distance in cm from no pain or 0 cm to the participant's anchor point.

Time frame: Change between baseline and two weeks from time of enrollment

Population: 16 subjects (without pain) were analyzed that reflects outcome measure below

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Subjects Without PainDecrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain0 cm
Subjects With Pain and No InterventionDecrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain2.0 cm
Subjects With Pain and InterventionDecrease in Chronic Subclinical Neck or Upper Quadrant Pain2.0 cm
Secondary

Level of Anxiety

Assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-form Y (STAI) which is a definitive clinical composite measure of state and trait anxiety in adults. Form Y has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety which will indicate how the subject feels right now/at this moment and how the subject generally feels. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from Almost Never to Almost Always) for a potential total of 80 points. A score of zero points represents no anxiety. A score of 80 points represents severe anxiety.

Time frame: Change between baseline and two weeks post-enrollment

Population: 16 subjects (without pain) were analyzed that reflects outcome measure below

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Without PainLevel of Anxiety13.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Subjects With Pain and No InterventionLevel of Anxiety18.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Subjects With Pain and InterventionLevel of Anxiety18.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

Neck Proprioception

Measurements assessed with NORAXON® myoMOTION™ System that is a composite measurement through an instrument that utilizes inertial measurement units (IMUs) to measure angles of motion in joints via sensors place on the head and neck. This system will measure cervical spine proprioception utilizing the joint position error (JPE) test by indicating the ability of a blindfolded subject to accurately reposition their head back to a predetermined neutral point after head movement.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: 16 subjects (without pain) were analyzed that reflects outcome measure below

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Subjects Without PainNeck Proprioception4.2 degreesStandard Deviation 2.3
Subjects With Pain and No InterventionNeck Proprioception4.7 degreesStandard Deviation 4.2
Subjects With Pain and InterventionNeck Proprioception4.7 degreesStandard Deviation 4.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026