Skip to content

Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

Predicting Outcome of Total Knee Replacement Surgery in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Prospective Study on the Role of Altered Central Pain Processing and Structural, Functional, Metabolic, Inflammatory and Psychological Factors

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05380648
Enrollment
223
Registered
2022-05-19
Start date
2018-03-08
Completion date
2023-07-14
Last updated
2023-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee

Brief summary

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the main cause of pain and disability in elderly. For knee OA, a total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective surgical treatment, and the majority of patients report substantial pain relief and functional improvement following surgery. However, 20-40% of patients undergoing TKR are dissatisfied with postsurgical outcome. Even after revision, some patients keep complaining of persisting pain. In this study, the investigators will examine putative prognostic factors on the basis of the biopsychosocial model. Besides several psychological factors (measured with questionnaires), the investigators will assess structural impairments (such as radiographic severity of OA), functional impairments (muscle weakness and proprioceptive deficits), anesthetic procedures, immediate postoperative pain management, metabolic factors (body composition and hemoglobin A1c), inflammatory factors (C-Reactive Protein) and the investigators also will examine the role of altered central pain processing (CPP) (primary and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia, mechanical temporal summation, thermal primary and secondary hyperalgesia, endogenous pain modulation). With a longitudinal study design, this study will explore which factors are predictive of poor outcome in knee OA patients after TKR. Moreover, the interrelationship between CPP, structural, functional, metabolic, inflammatory and psychological factors, and the clinical expression of knee OA (pain, symptoms, physical performance and quality of life) will be investigated. Further research on the role of the aforementioned putative prognostic factors on postsurgical outcome could contribute to better management of these patients, since these factors may be particularly important for patient-tailored treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal knee arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty surgery will be performed by different orthopedist.

Sponsors

Universiteit Antwerpen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Knee OA patients \>40 years awaiting TKR surgery. Both men and women of all ethnical backgrounds are included.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with diagnosis of neurological/ systemic diseases, possibly impacting pain * Patients who are not capable of understanding and speaking Dutch * Revision surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityChange from baseline pain intensity at 3 months postoperativeThe subscale 'Pain' of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) will be used as primary outcome measure. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 36. Scores are always transformed to a 0-100 scale. The higher the score, the higher the pain intensity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient demographicsBaseline (preoperative)measured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale patient demographics (nominal)
Central pain processing: mechanical local and widespread hyperalgesia allodyniaChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with quantitative sensory testing (QST): mechanical pain pressure threshold measured with digital algometer at the medial knee joint line, lateral knee joint line and m. Tibialis anterior of affected leg, m. extensor carpi radialis of non-dominant arm and forehead.
Central pain processing: bottom-up sensitizationChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with quantitative sensory testing (QST): temporal summation measured with a 60g Von Frey monofilament at the medial knee and lateral knee of affected leg, dorsal wrist of affected side
Central pain processing: Thermal hyperalgesiaChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with quantitative sensory testing (QST): thermal pain sensitivity measured with thermal rollers (Rolltemp II somedic senselab) at the medial knee and lateral knee of affected leg and m. extensor carpi radialis of non-dominant arm.
Central pain processing: dysfunctional endogenous pain analgesiaChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with quantitative sensory testing (QST): conditioned pain modulation measured Medoc at both wrists
Central pain processing: somatic and emotional symptomsChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeQuestionnaire: the Central sensitization Inventory (CSI). Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. The higher the score, the higher the chance for the presence of central sensitization.
Central pain processing: areas of painChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeBody chart: Expanded distribution of Pain (EDP). The more pain locations, the more chance for the presence of central sensitization
Psychosocial factors: pain catastrophizingChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 52. The higher the score, the higher the pain catastrophizing.
Psychosocial factors: illness perceptionsChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeIllness perception questionnaire-revised (IPQ-R) 1. Identity dimension: yes = 1; no = 0 min score= 0, max score= 18 2. Other dimensions: min score= 38, max score= 190 strongly disagree =1, disagree =2, neither agree or disagree = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5 3. Causal dimension: strongly disagree =1, disagree =2, neither agree or disagree = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5 min score= 18, max score= 90 High scores on the identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical dimensions represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to the illness, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness, and the cyclical nature of the condition. High scores on the personal control, treatment control and coherence dimensions, represent positive beliefs about the controllability of the illness and a personal understanding of the condition.
Psychosocial factors: anxietyChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), subscale anxiety. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21. The higher the score, the higher the anxiety.
Psychosocial factors: depressionChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), subscale depression. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 21. The higher the score, the higher the depression.
Functional factors: Maximal voluntary muscle strength m. HamstringsChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeStrength m. Hamstrings of both legs, measured with Biodex System 4 pro - dynamometer
Functional factors: Maximal voluntary muscle strength m. QuadricepsChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeStrength m. Quadriceps of both legs, measured with Biodex System 4 pro - dynamometer
Functional factors: proprioceptive accuracyChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeProprioception of the knee of both legs, measured with inclinometer
AlignmentBaseline (preoperative)measured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale objective knee score 'alignment': weight-bearing anterior-posterior radiograph measuring the femoral-tibial (Anatomic) axis. Minimum is 0, maximum is 25. The higher the score, the better the alignment.
Functional factors: leg strength and enduranceChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with 30 seconds Timed Chair-Stand-Test
Joint motionBaseline (preoperative)measured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale objective knee score 'joint motion'. Minimum is 0, maximum can be higher than 25. One point for every joint motion of 5 degrees. The higher the score, the better the joint motion.
Pain symptomsChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativemeasured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale symptoms. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 25. The higher the score, the worse the pain symptoms.
Patient expectationsBaseline (preoperative)measured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale patient expectations. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 15. The higher the score, the higher the patient's opinion on the extent to which the patient expects that the operation will improve their knee pain, and their ability to perform their activities of daily living and recreational activities
Patient expectations fulfillment3 months postoperativemeasured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale patient expectations. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 15. The higher the score, the higher the patient's opinion on the extent to which the outcome after the operation has met the patient's pre-operative expectations with respect to pain and function
Patient satisfactionChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativemeasured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale patient satisfaction. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 40. The higher the score, the more satisfied the patient feels with their knee.
Functional scoreChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativemeasured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale functional score. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. The higher the score, the better the functionality of the patient
Metabolic factors: Fat massChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with Bio-electrical Impedance Analyses (BIA)
Metabolic factors: Lean massChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with Bio-electrical Impedance Analyses (BIA)
Metabolic factors: Body mass index (BMI)Change from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with length of patient (cm) and weight of patient (kg)
Metabolic factors: body compositionBaseline (preoperative), 3 months postoperative, 1 year postoperative.Measured with Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
Metabolic factors: venous blood sampleChange from baseline (preoperative) to 3 months postoperativeMeasured with A1C test or glycohemoglobin test
Structural factorsBaseline (preoperative)Measured with Kellgren and Lawrence scale on radiography
Inflammatory factors: signs of inflammationBaseline (preoperative)Measured with the C-reactive protein levels in blood sample (collected from patient record)
Anesthetic procedureDuring surgeryGeneral anesthesia, spinal anesthesia or combination with peripheral block
Clinical pain scoreday 1 and 2 postoperativeMeasured with numeric rating pain scale
InstabilityBaseline (preoperative)measured with Knee Society Scoring System (KSS): subscale objective knee score 'instability'. Minimum is 0, maximum is 25. The higher the score, the better the stability.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026