Skip to content

Medico-economic Evaluation Comparing the Impact of the New Fixed-dose Nivolumab Regimen With the Old mg/kg Regimen in the Management of Patients With Metastatic Cancer

Medico-economic Evaluation Comparing the Impact of the New Fixed-dose Nivolumab Regimen With the Old mg/kg Regimen in the Management of Patients With Metastatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05380336
Acronym
IMEPOCA
Enrollment
40000
Registered
2022-05-18
Start date
2014-01-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

nivolumab, lung, kidney cancer, melanoma, cost-effectiveness

Brief summary

Nivolumab is a selective monoclonal antibody that binds to the Programmed cell Death 1 (PD-1) receptor and causes reduced tumor growth. It is currently approved in France in many indications. The firsts therapeutics indications validated by the French health authorities from 2015 - metastatic melanoma2, squamous and non-squamous NSCLC, Kidney cells carcinoma - were based on clinical trials demonstrating a clinical advantage over standard nivolumab treatment at a dose of 3mg/kg every two weeks. By comparing the results predicted by simulation based on a pharmacokinetic model with those obtained in clinical trials, the manufacturer of nivolumab concluded that a fixed dose of 240 mg was equivalent to that calculated based on the weight of the patients, and the European and then French health authorities have validated this change in clinical practice The objective of the IMEPOCA study is to assess in real life the economic and clinical impact of the dose modification of nivolumab that occurred in December 2018 in France. In order to assess the economic efficiency of the change in dose strategy at the national level, 2 cohorts of patients from the National Health Data System (SNDS), treated for metastatic cancer and followed up over 1 year will be compared: one having benefited from the weight-dependent dosage and the other having benefited from the fixed dosage

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab monotherapy * Patients whose nivolumab treatment was initiated between 2015 and 2020 * Patients with health insurance

Exclusion criteria

* Patients whose nivolumab treatment initiated in 2017 in mg/kg has progressed to a fixed dose in the 1st year of treatment * Patients treated with nivolumab in the adjuvant setting for melanoma with lymph node involvement or metastatic disease and who have undergone complete resection (Approval in 2018 for this indication) * Patients whose nivolumab treatment has been initiated in 2018

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the new nivolumab fixed-dose regimen of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks compared to the old regimen of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the management of patients with metastatic cancers.1 yearIncremental cost effectiveness ratio (in cost per year of life alive) according to a collective perspective and a time horizon of one year, according to the type of cancer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the patients characteristics between the 2015-2017 "de novo" cohort in mg/kg dosage and the 2019-2020 de novo cohort in fixed dosage by type of cancerbaselineInitial characteristics of patients treated with nivolumab (age, sex, average weight, medical history, previous treatments)
Comparison of nivolumab length of treatment between the 2015-2017 "de novo" cohort in mg/kg dosage and the 2019-2020 de novo cohort in fixed dosage by type of cancer1 yeartreatment time frame, including interruption or suspension periods
Comparison of nivolumab treatment dosage between the 2015-2017 "de novo" cohort in mg/kg dosage and the 2019-2020 de novo cohort in fixed dosage by type of cancer1 yearAverage dosage of nivolumab per patient hospitalisation
Comparison of number of hospitalisations for nivolumab treatment between the 2015-2017 "de novo" cohort in mg/kg dosage and the 2019-2020 de novo cohort in fixed dosage by type of cancer1 yearAverage number of hospitalisations for nivolumab treatment, per patient
Comparison of complications related to nivolumab between the 2015-2017 "de novo" cohort in mg/kg dosage and the 2019-2020 de novo cohort in fixed dosage by type of cancer1 yearnumber of complications related to nivolumab, identified through the health care consumptions
Patient survival analysis6 yearspatients date of death, by cancer type
Duration of treatment response6 yearsDuration of treatment
Budget impact analysis of the nivolumab fixed-dose regimen of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks compared to the old regimen of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks7 years (2015-2022)Comparison of the costs of nivolumab fixed-dose regimen of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks compared to the old regimen of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNicolas CORMIER, MD

Nantes University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026