Skip to content

A Study of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab in Participants With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05379634
Acronym
SPIREA
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-05-18
Start date
2022-07-05
Completion date
2026-09-16
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myositis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).

Interventions

Nipocalimab will be administered intravenously in double-blind period and LTE period.

OTHERPlacebo

Nipocalimab matching placebo will be administered intravenously in double-blind period.

DRUGGlucocorticoids

Prednisone or equivalent will be administered orally as Glucocorticoid.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Disease classification criteria: Participant meets the diagnostic criteria of probable or definite idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) based on 2017 The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for adult IIM at least 6 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention * If a participant is on regular or as needed treatment with low potency topical glucocorticoids (GC) that are allowed in the study or topical tacrolimus (TAC) to treat skin lesions, the dose and frequency should be stable for greater than or equal to (\>=) 4 weeks prior to first administration of the study intervention as well as maintained at the same dose until Week 52 of the study * Antibody positivity criteria: Any 1 of the myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) positive: dermatomyositis (DM): anti-Mi-2 (Mi-2/nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase \[NuRD\] complex), anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-Gamma (TIF1-Gamma), anti- nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 activating enzyme; anti- antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA-5) antibodies. Or immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): anti- signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti- 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies. Or anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS): anti- histidyl- ribonucleic acid \[tRNA\] synthetase (Jo-1), anti- threonyl-tRNA synthetase (PL7), anti- alanyl-tRNA synthetase (PL12), anti- isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (OJ), and anti- glycyl-tRNA synthetase (EJ) antibodies. If all MSAs are negative or more than 1 MSA is positive within different subtypes (defined by the central laboratory) at screening, the tests should be repeated during the screening period. If the same results are observed at retesting, the participant should not be enrolled in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Has a juvenile myositis diagnosis and now \>=18 years old * Has cancer-associated myositis defined as cancer diagnosis within 3 years of myositis diagnosis except for cervical carcinoma in situ and non-melanoma skin cancer (squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma of the skin) * Has comorbidities (example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \[COPD\]) which have required 3 or more courses of oral GC within 1 year prior to screening * Has a history of primary immunodeficiency or secondary immunodeficiency not related to the treatment of the participants IIM * Has experienced myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, or stroke within 12 weeks of screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (Greater Than or Equal to [>=] 20) in IMACS TIS and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52At Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS at Week 52 and on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: physicians' global activity, patient global activity (PtGA), manual muscle testing (MMT)-8, muscle enzymes, myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT), and health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI). The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TISAt Week 24IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
IMACS TISAt Week 52IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Moderate Improvement (>=40) in IMACS TISAt Week 24IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Moderate improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=40 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 at Week 52Baseline and Week 52Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 52 will be reported. Manual muscle testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Major Improvement (>=60) in IMACS TISAt Weeks 24 and 52IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Major improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=60 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Change From Baseline in MMT-8 at Week 24Baseline and Week 24Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 will be reported. Manual Muscle Testing is a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. It evaluates 8 muscle groups containing 1 axial, 5 proximal, and 2 distal muscle groups. MMT-8 score ranges from 0-150. Higher score indicates greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) at Weeks 24 and Week 52Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in PhGA at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. Physician Global Activity is a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Global Assessment (Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool [MDAAT]) at Weeks 24 and 52Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in MDAAT score at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported. This is a validated tool which measures the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle. MDAAT is scored on a 10 centimeter (cm) scale ranging from 0-10 cm where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity. Higher score indicates more disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Serum Muscle Enzymes Levels at Weeks 24 and 52Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52Change from baseline in serum muscle enzymes levels (creatine kinase \[CK\], alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\], aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\], lactate dehydrogenase \[LDH\], and aldolase) at Weeks 24 and 52 will be reported.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral Glucocorticoids (GC) Reduction to 5 Milligrams per day (mg/day) of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent), Among Participants on Oral GC Greater Than (>) 5 mg/day at BaselineFrom Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on Less Than or Equal to (<=) 5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52From Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Percentage of Participants on <=5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52From Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants on \<=5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve At Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to 5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >5 mg/day at BaselineFrom Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to 5 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>5 mg/day at baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS From Week 44 Through Week 52 and on <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) From Week 44 Through Week 52From Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and on \<=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) from Week 44 through Week 52 will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day of Oral Prednisone (or Equivalent) at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at BaselineAt Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve oral GC reduction to \<=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>7.5 mg/day at baseline will be reported.
Percentage of Participants who Achieve at Least Minimal Improvement (>=20) in IMACS TIS and Achieve Oral GC Reduction to <=7.5 mg/day at Week 44 and Maintain That Reduction Through Week 52, Among Participants on Oral GC >7.5 mg/day at BaselineFrom Week 44 through Week 52Percentage of participants who achieve at least minimal improvement (\>=20) in IMACS TIS from Week 44 through Week 52 and achieve oral GC reduction to \<=7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent) at Week 44 and maintain that reduction through Week 52, among participants on oral GC \>7.5 mg/day at Baseline will be reported. IMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. Minimal improvement is defined as IMACS TIS \>=20 in participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
IMACS TIS Over TimeUp to 106 weeksIMACS TIS is a standardized clinical response criteria to assess minimal, moderate and major clinical improvement in adult participants with IIM. The criteria use the 6 IMACS core set measures: PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-DI. The absolute percentage change in each measure with varying weights is combined to obtain a TIS on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher score indicates greater improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) Scale Score at Weeks 24 and 52Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52The CDASI scale is a validated dermatomyositis (DM) specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
Change in CDASI Scale Score Over TimeUp to 106 WeeksThe CDASI scale is a validated DM specific instrument that systematically quantifies activity and damage in the skin of participant with DM. Disease involvement in 15 different anatomical locations is rated using three activity scales (erythema, scale, erosion/ulceration) and two damage measures (poikiloderma, calcinosis) measures. Gottron's papules/sign on the hands are also evaluated in terms of activity (erythema/ulceration) and damage (dyspigmentation or scarring). Disease activity scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 106 weeksAny AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 106 weeksAny AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention through the safety follow-up visit will be considered as treatment-emergent. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product; is medically important.
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)- Physical Function (PF)-20Baseline and Week 52PROMIS-PF-20 is a participant self-administered 20-item questionnaire assessing the physical function domain. It includes 14 items regarding patients' ability to conduct specific functional activities and 6 items regarding the extent to which their health limits their ability to perform a range of physical activities currently. The 5-point response options for the former items range from 1 "Unable to do" to 5 "Without any difficulty" and the latter items range from 1 "Cannot do" to 5 "Not at all" with higher scores indicating better functioning. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher score indicates better physical function.
Change From Baseline in Functional Disability Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-disability Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52HAQ-DI score assess functional status of participant. It is 20 question instrument that assess degree of functional disability a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and common activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0=indicating no difficulty, to 3=indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Total HAQ score is average of the computed categories scores ranging from 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. Lower scores are indicative of better functioning.
Serum Nipocalimab Concentration Over TimeBaseline Up to Week 98Serum nipocalimab concentration over time will be reported. Serum nipocalimab concentration will be derived using population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay MethodBaseline Up to Week 106Number of participants with ADA to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (Nabs) to Nipocalimab Measured Using a Validated, Specific, and Sensitive Immunoassay MethodBaseline Up to Week 106Number of participants with Nabs to Nipocalimab measured using a validated, specific, and sensitive immunoassay method will be reported.

Countries

Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Poland, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJanssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026