Difference in Regional Brain Activity
Conditions
Brief summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. People with MS frequently suffer from cognitive and visual impairment. Moreover, patients rank cognition and vision as two of the three most valuable bodily functions, in addition to mobility. Here the investigator use the established backward masking paradigm to study structural and functional alteration at the sub-milimeter scale in ultra-high field MRI in order to decipher the different input-output loops associated with the preservation and alteration of cognition in MS.
Detailed description
To identify abnormalities in mesoscale input and output connectivity at structural and functional levels that differ between patients with and without cognitive impairment. To address this objective, the investigator will analyse and compare functional activations in the primary visual cortex and task-associated regions in our previous studies. Secondary objectives: To develop, improve and validate multimodal laminar imaging at ultra-high field strength (7T) in comparison to control subjects available in our database to identify and quantify focal impairment in MS. This is a cross-sectional study. 40 patients (20 patients with a cognitive deficit at least 2 SD below the norm and 20 patients without cognitive impairment) will be explored by multimodal ultra-high field (7T) MRI. The protocol included task, resting FMRI (functional connectivity), diffusion tensor (structural connectivity) and anatomical sequences (lesions and atrophy). In addition, the investigator will analyse standard clinical assessments including a neuropsychological examination. To understand the mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration and adaptation, it is important to contrast physiological and pathological alterations. In addition to comparing cognitively preserved and cognitively impaired patients, the investigator aim to compare our participants to a representative normative dataset available in our database of healthy individuals.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTIRM multimodale a ultra-haute camp
The MRI includes, in addition to structural task sequences, diffusion imaging and resting state fMRI.
Sponsors
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
40 patients (20 patients with a cognitive deficit at least 2 SD below the norm and 20 patients without cognitive impairment) will be explored by multimodal ultra-high field (7T) MRI
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients (\>= 18 years of age) with MS defined according to the McDonald criteria 2017 (Thompson et al., 2018) * For the group of patients without cognitive impairment: SDMT or PASAT \>=0 (based previous clinical assessments) * For the group of patients with cognitive impairment: SD SDMT or PASAT \<= -1.5 (based based on previous clinical assessments) (Parmenter et al., 2007) * Person without uncontrolled systemic disease such as cancer, autoimmune disease, liver failure, severe or untreated hypertension, conduction conduction disorder or severe rhythm disorder * No one with chronic psychiatric illness, severe dementia syndrome demented syndrome. * No contraindication to MRI examination (claustrophobia, metallic foreign bodies, pacemakers), * A person with social security coverage, * Person having read, understood and signed an informed consent after information
Exclusion criteria
* Pregnant women * Other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the CNS * Usual contraindications for an MRI examination: claustrophobia, metallic foreign bodies pacemakers, severe renal insufficiency.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in regional brain activity between patients with and without cognitive impairment measured by the Bold signal | 1 year | The explorations will be performed on a very high field imager (7T Terra, Siemens, Erlangen) dedicated to the research. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive performance | 1 year | The precision corresponding to the % of correct answers. |
| Morphology | 1 year | Cortical thickness. Next, the investigator will use Freesurfer (www.surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) to perform a vertex-wise cross-sectional comparison of cortical thickness between the two groups using a general linear model (GLM) controlling for age and sex. In a second model, the association between cortical thickness and time to conscious treatment will be calculated, also corrected for age and sex in the GLM. The results per vertex were corrected by the false discovery rate (FDR) at a threshold of p \< 0.05. |
| Structural connectivity | 1 year | The investigator will use the average FA to construct weighted connectivity matrices between 160 nodes (80 cortical regions per hemisphere) based on the Destrieux atlas. Strength, as a measure of regional structural connectivity, was calculated as the sum of weighted connections within and between each node for each subject. |
| Functional connectivity | 1 year | First, the investigator will perform preprocessing of the resting fMRI data, including correction for motion distortion and slice synchronization and cor- gistration with T1 volume and regional parcellation using SPM12. Then, all voxels in each region and time points will be averaged after application of the regression procedure for head motion, cerebrospinal fluid signals, white matter signals, and the overall average signal. After the preprocessing step, the output data acquired from the averaged region time series were used to perform wavelet analysis (frequency band: 0.1 Hz - 0.05 Hz, TR=2.5 s) using the brainwaver package in R. To calculate the raw functional connectivity, the investigator will calculate the absolute Pearson correlations between the time series of the wavelet coefficients of each region. For better comparability of the networks, the top 15% of connections defined the connectivity matrices. The degree of the nodes is the primary evaluation criterion. |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactJan-Patrick STELLMANN
Outcome results
None listed