Skip to content

Disclosing Dementia Risk Based on Plasma Phosphorylated Tau

Disclosing Dementia Risk Based on Plasma Phosphorylated Tau

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05377060
Enrollment
28
Registered
2022-05-17
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2025-06-01
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Brief summary

Novel blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), such as plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), have shown great promise in detecting early AD pathology. While current studies point to this biomarker as having great clinical utility, one necessary step before clinical implementation is developing safe and effective methods for disclosure of results. Past risk disclosure studies have shown that disclosing risk for AD based on genetics or amyloid status is safe, but these studies have largely focused on cognitively unimpaired individuals. This study seeks to develop comprehensible educational materials to aid risk disclosure and examine the effect of risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 results in a group of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at imminent risk of converting to dementia. First, educational materials will be developed in collaboration with health communication experts and then refined in focus groups made up of individuals with MCI. Educational materials will be analyzed on several key reading and comprehensibility metrics and will include personalized risk estimate based on a well-accepted risk algorithm (Cullen, et al., 2021). Next, these educational materials will be utilized to disclose risk in a randomized controlled trial with an active control arm receiving disclosure based on age, sex, and cognitive status (based on Mini-Mental State Examination), meant to mimic common methods of clinical diagnostic and prognostic decision making, and an intervention arm receiving disclosure based on the above factors plus plasma p-tau181 results. Outcomes will include measures of comprehension and psychological well-being (anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and distress) and will be assessed immediately after risk disclosure and again at six-month follow-up. It is hypothesized that risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 is not more psychologically harmful or less comprehensible than disclosure based on demographic factors and MMSE. This pilot study will provide a necessary step towards moving plasma p-tau biomarkers towards safe clinical implementation and will develop educational materials that can be utilized in future studies and clinical practice.

Detailed description

Novel blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), such as plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), have shown great promise in sensitively and specifically detecting early AD pathology. Plasma p-tau181 has the potential to dramatically reduce the financial strain and patient care burden associated with identifying patients at increased risk of AD-dementia, as well as improve screening for enrollment in clinical trials which require the presence of AD-pathological changes. While current studies point to this biomarker as having great clinical utility, one necessary step before clinical implementation is developing safe and effective methods for disclosure of results. Past risk disclosure studies have shown that disclosing risk for AD based on genetics or amyloid status is safe, but these studies have largely focused on cognitively unimpaired individuals. This study seeks to develop comprehensible educational materials to aid risk disclosure and examine the effect of risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 results in a group of participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at imminent risk of converting to dementia. First, educational materials will be developed in collaboration with health communication experts and then refined in focus groups made up of individuals with MCI. Educational materials will be analyzed on several key reading and comprehensibility metrics and will include personalized risk estimate based on a well-accepted risk algorithm (Cullen, et al., 2021). Next, these educational materials will be utilized to disclose risk in a randomized controlled trial with an active control arm receiving disclosure based on age, sex, and cognitive status (based on Mini-Mental State Examination), meant to mimic common methods of clinical diagnostic and prognostic decision making, and an intervention arm receiving disclosure based on the above factors plus plasma p-tau181 results. Outcomes will include measures of comprehension and psychological well-being (anxiety, depression, hopelessness, and distress) and will be assessed immediately after risk disclosure and again at six-month follow-up. It is hypothesized that risk disclosure based on plasma p-tau181 is not more psychologically harmful or less comprehensible than disclosure based on demographic factors and MMSE. This pilot study will provide a necessary step towards moving plasma p-tau biomarkers towards safe clinical implementation and will develop educational materials that can be utilized in future studies and clinical practice.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPlasma p-tau risk disclosure

Participants will receive an estimated risk for converting to dementia in the next four years based on age, sex, MMSE score, and plasma p-tau results.

BEHAVIORALStandard risk disclosure

Participants will receive an estimated risk for converting to dementia in the next four years based on age, sex, and MMSE score.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants recruited will include 62 adults aged 60 and older. 2. Consensus diagnosis of amnestic MCI by Vanderbilt Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (VADRC) clinician panel. 3. Availability of a reliable study partner (reliable is defined as someone who interacts significantly with the participant and is available to participate in study visits in person). 4. English language fluency.

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals who lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent at baseline will not be enrolled in the study. 2. History of major psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar), neurological illness (e.g., epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease), or head injury with significant loss of consciousness. 3. Presence of acute psychological distress (i.e., Geriatric Depression Scale \>10 at screening). 4. Participation in other risk disclosure protocols.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geriatric Depression ScaleImmediately following disclosureQuestionnaire assessing depression
Geriatric Depression Scale - 6-month follow-upImmediately following disclosure and at 6-month follow-upQuestionnaire assessing depression
Geriatric Anxiety ScaleImmediately following disclosureQuestionnaire assessing anxiety
Geriatric Anxiety Scale - 6-month follow-upAt 6-month follow-upQuestionnaire assessing anxiety
Beck Hopelessness ScaleImmediately following disclosureQuestionnaire assessing hopelessness
Beck Hopelessness Scale - 6-month follow-upAt 6-month follow-upQuestionnaire assessing hopelessness
Impact of Events ScaleAt 6-month follow-upQuestionnaire assessing event-related distress
Immediate ComprehensionImmediately following disclosureSemi-structured interview to assess comprehension of disclosure information
Long-term ComprehensionAt 6-month follow-upSemi-structured interview to assess comprehension of disclosure information

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026