Skip to content

Evaluation of MoodRing on Improving the Quality of Depression Management in Adolescents

Technology and Emotion Study TECH-E: Randomized Controlled Trial of MoodRing Compared to Usual Care: Mobile Monitoring of Adolescent Depression Phase II

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05376358
Acronym
TECH-E
Enrollment
73
Registered
2022-05-17
Start date
2022-05-12
Completion date
2024-06-20
Last updated
2025-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression in Adolescence

Keywords

Adolescent, Adolescent Medicine, Mental Health Services, eHealth, Mobile Applications, Symptom Management

Brief summary

The MoodRing intervention is a mobile application for adolescents, parents, and an accompanying web-based clinician portal which enables adolescents to monitor their mood through the use of passively collected smartphone data. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether MoodRing as compared to usual care improves the quality of depression management.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of MoodRing as compared to usual care for adolescents who have a prior diagnosis of depression. Adolescents with depressive symptoms, their parents, and their mental healthcare providers (if interested) will participate in a 6 month study. Adolescents age 12-18 and their parent will be consented for the study and be sent an online survey to obtain baseline measures. Those who complete the baseline measures will then be randomized to receive the MoodRing intervention or treatment as usual. Adolescents and parents will be asked to complete data collection at 3 months and 6 month time points post-randomization by online survey. Additionally, data will be collected for 3 and 6 month timepoints via the adolescent's electronic health record data. At 6 months, online surveys will be sent and an invitation to interview for patients' mental healthcare providers who consent to participate in the study. Adolescent-parent dyads will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio (using randomized block sizes) to either 1) MoodRing or 2) usual care. 100 adolescent-parent dyads (200 total individuals) will be randomized to MoodRing and 100 adolescent-parent dyads (200 total individuals) will be randomized to usual care. We expect 50 clinicians will participate. In both arms, passively collected data will be obtained from adolescent smartphones as well as weekly mood surveys and monthly sleep surveys. In the 1) MoodRing arm adolescents will download the MoodRing-adolescent app, parents will download the MoodRing-parent app, and healthcare providers if interested will have access to a clinician dashboard. The randomization tables will be generated by the study statistician. The investigators hypothesize that adolescents who receive MoodRing as compared to usual care will have: H1: Improved self-management of depression as measured by change of baseline for the average score on the Partners in Health Scale EH2: The investigators will also explore whether MoodRing as compared to usual care will result in improved quality of depression management as measured by frequency of symptom reassessment, medication adherence, and therapy adherence, less healthcare utilization, decreased depression symptoms, improved sleep quality, and increased application of self-management activities through increased self-efficacy, utilization of self-management skills and knowledge and social support. H3: The investigators anticipate healthcare providers, adolescents, and parents will report satisfaction with use of MoodRing. \* After date September 2022, we decided to make a change to the protocol and primary outcome. Due to recruitment challenges from mental health clinicians due to their clinical workload, we made a change to recruit adolescents directly including using social media. This introduced more heterogeneity to access to mental health care as well as less access to electronic health records systems that were external to our site which made it less likely to be able to measure quality of depression management. For this reason, the goal to recruit healthcare providers was discontinued. And the primary outcome was changed to self-management, changing our hypothesis to: We hypothesized that MoodRing will help adolescents better self-manage their depression. Secondary outcome measures were changed from change in symptoms to just that symptom total at 3 months and 6 months for better clinical interpretability.

Interventions

DEVICEMoodRing App

Adolescents and parents in the MR arm will receive instructions to download the MR app and AWARE app, customize the app, utilize an app-based self-guided onboarding, and review questions with the research team. The MR app provides the adolescent and their parent a notification to view a weekly report predicting their mood score (i.e. depression severity level similar to the Patient health questionnaire-9). The MR app will provide a library of coping strategies for adolescents and opportunities to self-track their mood. Clinicians in the MR Arm will get access to a MR portal online. They will be able to view patients they are a provider for. The clinician will receive in-person and/or video-based training to use the portal.

OTHERUsual Care

Adolescents and parents in the usual care arm will receive instructions to download the AWARE app. This app will only track data and will not be interactive. Otherwise they will receive care as per routine by their healthcare provider team.

Sponsors

NuRelm, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Virginia
CollaboratorOTHER
Ana Radovic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcomes assessors will be masked to the intervention condition at follow-up assessment time points.

Intervention model description

This study will use a parallel study design, where participants are randomized into two intervention groups (Usual Care or MoodRing) and will receive interventions in parallel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adolescent: * age 12 -18 * prior or present history of depression per self-report and/or clinician diagnosis * scores between 5 or higher on PHQ-9 consistent with at least mild symptoms of depression * read and understand English * has an Android or iOS smartphone compatible with AWARE mobile application and access to a smartphone data plan * currently in United States Parent/Guardian: * adolescent qualifies for study and assents to enroll * understands English * currently in United States * has a smartphone device that can download the intervention application Healthcare Provider: \- involved in providing mental health treatment (psychotherapy or antidepressant prescribing or making referrals) to adolescent participant - can be a primary care provider, therapist, subspecialist, psychiatrist

Exclusion criteria

Adolescent: * currently actively suicidal (have suicidal thoughts and plan with an intent to act on it) * plans to travel to countries belonging to the European Union (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden), the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland), Norway, Iceland, or Lichtenstein in the next 6 months for more than 2 weeks at a time Parent: \- If their adolescent child is excluded Healthcare Provider: \- None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Self-management at 3 MonthsFrom baseline to 3 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Partners in Health Scale The revised Partners in Health Scale (Smith 2016) assesses self-management with respect to a chronic condition, with regard to active involvement of a patient in managing their condition. Total scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating worse self-management. A larger negative change in self-management score means an improvement in self-management.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment3 monthsAttendance at a healthcare provider visit for depression symptom reassessment within 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent or parent self-report (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.
Quality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence3 monthsOut of adolescents who are taking an antidepressant, receipt of at least 60 consecutive days (yes/no) measured by adolescent self-report. The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.
Quality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence3 monthsOut of adolescents who report being referred for psychotherapy, receipt of at least 3 sessions within 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent and parent self-report (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.
Healthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)3 monthAverage Number of visits for (greater number as reported by adolescent self-report and parent self-report): 1. urgent care; 2. emergency room; 3. inpatient hospitalization; 4. acute primary care provider visit for non-mental health related concern; 5. medical subspecialist visit 6. surgical subspecialist visit
Depression Severity at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will be asked the PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measures depression severity with a score ranging from 0 to 27, a higher score indicating greater severity.
Sleep-Related Impairment at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep-Related Impairment scale. This scale has four questions with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 19 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep-related impairment.
Sleep Disturbance at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Disturbance scale. This scale has four questions, the second (sleeping through the night) being reverse-scored, with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep disturbance.
Self-Efficacy at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (MHSES) The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (Clarke, 2014) measures one's belief in one's capability to perform mental health self-care behaviors. The score ranges from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher confidence in mental health selfcare.
Self-management Behavior at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will be asked based on Question 12 of Partners in Health Scale about self-management behavior. This question asks the average amount of time (options including Daily, More than once a week, Once a week, Once a month, Once a semester, Once a year, Less than once a year, Never) spent in potentially useful self-management activities. Each time category will be described by a percentage. Each of the following are asked individually: (1) created to-do lists to help me focus; (2) found strategies to create pleasurable distractions; (3) engaged in some physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.); (4) set realistic short-term goals; (5) made sure I had a good day/night routine with got enough sleep; (6) ensured enough rest to avoid getting exhausted; (7) left the house regularly; (8) ate healthy A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Social Support at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Scale (Sherbourne, 1991) measures types of social support. Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and the total score is averaged and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher levels associated with greater support.
Change in Self-management at 6 MonthsFrom baseline to 6 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Partners in Health Scale The revised Partners in Health Scale (Smith 2016) assesses self-management with respect to a chronic condition, with regard to active involvement of a patient in managing their condition. Total scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating worse self-management. A larger negative change in self-management score means an improvement in self-management.
Depression Severity at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will be asked the PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measures depression severity with a score ranging from 0 to 27, a higher score indicating greater severity.
Self-management Behavior at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will be asked based on Question 12 of Partners in Health Scale about self-management behavior. This question asks the average amount of time (options including Daily, More than once a week, Once a week, Once a month, Once a semester, Once a year, Less than once a year, Never) spent in potentially useful self-management activities. Each of the following are asked individually: (1) created to-do lists to help me focus; (2) found strategies to create pleasurable distractions; (3) engaged in some physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.); (4) set realistic short-term goals; (5) made sure I had a good day/night routine with got enough sleep; (6) ensured enough rest to avoid getting exhausted; (7) left the house regularly; (8) ate healthy
Self-Efficacy at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (MHSES) The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (Clarke, 2014) measures one's belief in one's capability to perform mental health self-care behaviors. The score ranges from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher confidence in mental health selfcare.
Social Support at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will be asked the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Scale (Sherbourne, 1991) measures types of social support. Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and the total score is averaged and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher levels associated with greater support.
Sleep-Related Impairment at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep-Related Impairment scale. This scale has four questions with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 19 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep-related impairment.
Sleep Disturbance at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Disturbance scale. This scale has four questions, the second (sleeping through the night) being reverse-scored, with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep disturbance.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Habits at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will respond to the School Based Sleep Habits Survey-Child Form which asks 43 questions about weekday and weeknight sleep patterns, sleep awakenings, and sleep time preferences.
Perceived Need for Service Use at 3 Months3 monthsThe General-practice Users Perceived-need Inventory (GUPI) The General-Practice Users Perceived-Need Inventory (McNab, 2004) will be used to measure perceived need for treatment. There is no scoring. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's need for mental health services. The response will be evaluated by the total number of individuals who agree that they would like to or are already getting help with a) medication and b) counseling as comapred to those who respond they do not need this kind of help.
Perceived Severity at 3 Months3 monthsRating scale of General Mental Health A rating scale of General Mental Health (Cadigan, 2018) will be used with two questions each ranging from 1 to 5 with regard to a self-rating of general mental health. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's mental health.
Anxiety Severity at 3 Months3 monthsAdolescents will be asked the GAD-7 Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item Questionnaire measures extent of anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating greater severity.
Parent-Teen Communication Quality at 3 Months3 monthsM-PACS (The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (Olson, 1985) modified for mental health) asks 20 questions with regards to communication between parents and adolescents, with responses 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Some items are reverse scored with a higher scale score indicating better communication. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.
Parent-Teen Relationship Quality at 3 Months3 monthsThe CPCS (Child Parent Connectedness Scale) asks 5 questions from a scale of 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree with regards to connectedness and relationship satisfaction with each other. A higher score indicates higher child-parent connectedness. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.
Suicidal Thoughts3 monthsAdolescents who respond with anything besides none to the 9th question of the PHQ-9 will be asked to complete the brief CSSR-S scale. This scale asks two questions, have you (the participant) wished you (the participant) were dead or wished you (the participant) could go to sleep and not wake up? (yes/no) and have you (the participant) actually had any thoughts of killing yourself? (yes/no). Positive answers indicate suicidal thinking. These will be asked on an online survey. Those adolescents responding positively will complete a full CSSR-S interview.
Perceived Severity at 6 Months6 monthsRating scale of General Mental Health A rating scale of General Mental Health (Cadigan, 2018) will be used with two questions each ranging from 1 to 5 with regard to a self-rating of general mental health. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's mental health.
Perceived Need for Service Use at 6 Months6 monthsThe General-practice Users Perceived-need Inventory (GUPI) The General-Practice Users Perceived-Need Inventory (McNab, 2004) will be used to measure perceived need for treatment. There is no scoring. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's need for mental health services. The response will be evaluated by the total number of individuals who agree that they would like to or are already getting help with a) medication and b) counseling as comapred to those who respond they do not need this kind of help.
Acceptability of MoodRing: Heathcare Provider Acceptabilityat 6 monthsSystem Usability Questionnaire (Bangor, 2008) asks 11 questions about the usability of a technological intervention. SUS scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better usability.
Acceptability of MoodRing as a Clinical Tool: Heathcare Provider Acceptabilityat 6 monthsAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (Weiner, 2017) asks 4 questions on a 1-5 Likert scale with completely disagree to completely agree with regards to acceptability of an intervention and 3 questions were added including with regards to efficiency, help taking care of patients, patient benefit from the intervention. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Also an open-ended question will be asked about feedback using MoodRing.
Acceptability of MoodRing: Adolescent/Parent Acceptabilityat 6 monthsSystem Usability Questionnaire (Bangor, 2008) asks 11 questions about the usability of a technological intervention. SUS scores 0-100. Higher scores indicate better usability. Adolescents and Parents - only those randomized to the MoodRing arm - will be asked these questions.
Acceptability of MoodRing as a Self-management Tool: Adolescent/Parent Acceptabilityat 6 monthsAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (Weiner, 2017) asks 4 questions on a 1-5 Likert scale with completely disagree to completely agree with regards to acceptability of an intervention. Additional questions will be asked about perceived benefit, taking care of mental health, and confidence in mental health management. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Also an open-ended question will be asked about feedback using MoodRing. Adolescents and Parents - only those randomized to the MoodRing arm - will be asked these questions.
Anxiety Severity at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will be asked the GAD-7 Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item Questionnaire measures extent of anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating greater severity.
Parent-Teen Communication Quality at 6 Months6 monthsM-PACS (The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (Olson, 1985) modified for mental health) asks 20 questions with regards to communication between parents and adolescents, with responses 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Some items are reverse scored with a higher scale score indicating better communication. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.
Parent-Teen Relationship Quality at 6 Months6 monthsThe CPCS (Child Parent Connectedness Scale) asks 5 questions from a scale of 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree with regards to connectedness and relationship satisfaction with each other. A higher score indicates higher child-parent connectedness. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.
Sleep Habits at 6 Months6 monthsAdolescents will respond to the School Based Sleep Habits Survey-Child Form which asks 43 questions about weekday and weeknight sleep patterns, sleep awakenings, and sleep time preferences.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment sources: 81.4% from social media advertisement (591/726), 9.5% completing an electronic interest form in clinic at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Health (69/726), and from 9% completing the University of Pittsburgh online interest form (Pitt+Me) (66/726). Out of these, 12.5% (91/726) were able to be reached to complete screening. Prior to the study a plan was made to enroll healthcare providers. One provider was approached did not enroll.

Pre-assignment details

Both the adolescent and the parent were required to complete the baseline survey to enter the study. Out of 73 adolescent and parent dyads consented for the study, 68 (93.1%) of adolescents completed the baseline survey while, despite multiple contacts, only 63 (86.3%) of parents completed the baseline. Therefore 63 adolescent parent dyads were able to start the study and were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MoodRing - Adolescents
Adolescent participants in this arm will download two mobile applications - a data collection non-interactive app to collect passive sensing data (AWARE) and the MoodRing (MR) mobile application with which they can visualize their data about their mood, sleep, activity, enter their own mood score, and access psychoeducational resources including links to a research-based website, SOVA. MoodRing App: Adolescents in the MR arm will receive instructions to download the MR app and AWARE app, customize the app, utilize an app-based self-guided onboarding, and review questions with the research team. The MR app provides the adolescent a notification to view a weekly report predicting their mood score (i.e. depression severity level similar to the Patient health questionnaire-9). The MR app will provide a library of coping strategies for adolescents and opportunities to self-track their mood.
32
MoodRing - Parents
Parents will download a parent MoodRing application which provides them with parenting resources and articles and a weekly report of their adolescents' mood as predicted by passive sensing. The MR app provides the parent a notification to view a weekly report predicting their mood score (i.e. depression severity level similar to the Patient health questionnaire-9).
32
Usual Care - Adolescents
Participants in this arm will receive no intervention and access treatment as usual per their mental health services provider. A mobile application (AWARE) which is not interactive and is only for purposes of data collection will be downloaded on the adolescents' smartphone. Usual Care: Adolescents in the usual care arm will receive instructions to download the AWARE app. This app will only track data and will not be interactive. Otherwise they will receive care as per routine by their healthcare provider team.
31
Usual Care - Parents
Parents will not receive an intervention but only complete data collection.
31
Total126

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
3 Month Timepoint Data CollectionDyads who did not complete 3 month due to adolescent not completing (ONLY PARENT COMPLETED)33
3 Month Timepoint Data CollectionDyads who did not complete 3 month due to parent not completing (ONLY ADOLESCENT COMPLETED)1315
3 Month Timepoint Data CollectionLost to Follow-up35
6 Month Timepoint Data CollectionDyads who did not complete 6 month due to parent not completing (ONLY ADOLESCENT COMPLETED)1413
6 Month Timepoint Data CollectionLost to Follow-up86

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMoodRing - AdolescentsUsual Care - AdolescentsTotalMoodRing - ParentsUsual Care - Parents
Age, Continuous
Adolescents
16.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.41
15.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.45
15.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43
Age, Continuous
Parents
46.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.94
45.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
47.16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants27 Participants118 Participants32 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants7 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants11 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants4 Participants9 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants23 Participants98 Participants26 Participants26 Participants
Self-Management60.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.14
59.74 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.51
60.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.91
Sex/Gender, Customized
Boy/Man
8 Participants10 Participants20 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Girl/Woman
18 Participants19 Participants98 Participants30 Participants31 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Not applicable
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 620 / 64
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 620 / 64
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 620 / 64

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Self-management at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Partners in Health Scale The revised Partners in Health Scale (Smith 2016) assesses self-management with respect to a chronic condition, with regard to active involvement of a patient in managing their condition. Total scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating worse self-management. A larger negative change in self-management score means an improvement in self-management.

Time frame: From baseline to 3 months

Population: The pre-specified statistical analysis was not scientifically appropriate due to insufficient enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareChange From Baseline in Self-management at 3 Months12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
MoodRingChange From Baseline in Self-management at 3 Months-1.84 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.04
Secondary

Change in Self-management at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Partners in Health Scale The revised Partners in Health Scale (Smith 2016) assesses self-management with respect to a chronic condition, with regard to active involvement of a patient in managing their condition. Total scores range from 0 to 96 with higher scores indicating worse self-management. A larger negative change in self-management score means an improvement in self-management.

Time frame: From baseline to 6 months

Population: Only participants completing this measure were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareChange in Self-management at 6 Months-1.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
MoodRingChange in Self-management at 6 Months-4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
Secondary

Depression Severity at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked the PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measures depression severity with a score ranging from 0 to 27, a higher score indicating greater severity.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareDepression Severity at 3 Months11.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.56
MoodRingDepression Severity at 3 Months11.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.14
Secondary

Depression Severity at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked the PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measures depression severity with a score ranging from 0 to 27, a higher score indicating greater severity.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescents

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareDepression Severity at 6 Months11.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.88
MoodRingDepression Severity at 6 Months8.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
Secondary

Healthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)

Number of visits for (combined total between adolescent self-report, parent self-report, and electronic health-record review): 1. urgent care; 2. emergency room; 3. inpatient hospitalization; 4. acute primary care provider visit for non-mental health related concern; 5. medical or surgical subspecialist visit

Time frame: 6 month

Population: Number participants include Adolescents who did not respond to the question on their baseline survey but their Parents did - total number of responses measured by adolescent or parent self-report even if one was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Surgical Subspecialist Visit0.13 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.43
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Emergency Room0 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Inpatient Hospitalization0 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Acute PCP visit non mental health0.30 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.52
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Medical Subspecialist Visit0.61 patient visitsStandard Deviation 1.19
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Urgent Care Visits0.22 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.58
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Medical Subspecialist Visit0.94 patient visitsStandard Deviation 1.58
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Inpatient Hospitalization0.04 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.2
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Surgical Subspecialist Visit0.15 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.54
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Urgent Care Visits0.27 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.64
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Acute PCP visit non mental health0.27 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.56
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Emergency Room0.15 patient visitsStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Healthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)

Average Number of visits for (greater number as reported by adolescent self-report and parent self-report): 1. urgent care; 2. emergency room; 3. inpatient hospitalization; 4. acute primary care provider visit for non-mental health related concern; 5. medical subspecialist visit 6. surgical subspecialist visit

Time frame: 3 month

Population: Number participants include Adolescents who did not respond to the question on their baseline survey but their Parents did - total number of responses measured by adolescent or parent self-report even if one was missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Urgent Care Visits0.21 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.53
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Emergency Room0.10 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.31
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Inpatient Hospitalization0.10 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.39
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Acute PCP visit non mental health0.52 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.79
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Medical Subspecialist Visit0.62 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.94
Usual CareHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Surgical Subspecialist Visit0.15 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.46
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Medical Subspecialist Visit0.37 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.71
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Urgent Care Visits0.20 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.48
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Acute PCP visit non mental health0.44 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.95
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Emergency Room0.22 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.54
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Surgical Subspecialist Visit0.15 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.53
MoodRingHealthcare Utilization for Acute Care or Primary Care (for Non Mental-health Reason)Inpatient Hospitalization0 average number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment

Attendance at a healthcare provider visit for depression symptom reassessment within the past 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent, parent self-report and electronic health record review (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Number participants include Adolescents who did not respond to the question on their baseline survey but their Parents did - total number of responses measured by adolescent or parent self-report even if one was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment14 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment16 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment

Attendance at a healthcare provider visit for depression symptom reassessment within 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent or parent self-report (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number participants include Adolescents who did not respond to the question on their baseline survey but their Parents did - total number of responses measured by adolescent or parent self-report even if one was missing.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment20 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Depression Symptom Reassessment24 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence

Out of adolescents who are taking an antidepressant, receipt of at least 60 consecutive days (yes/no) measured by adolescent self-report. The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number analyzed are adolescents who either themselves or their parent indicate taking/being prescribed an antidepressant.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence16 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence12 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence

Out of adolescents who are taking an antidepressant, receipt of at least 60 consecutive days (yes/no) within the past 3 months, measured by adolescent, parent self-report and electronic health record review (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Number analyzed were adolescents who either themselves or had their parent indicate that they are taking/prescribed an antidepressant.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence11 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Medication Adherence11 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence

Out of adolescents who report being referred for psychotherapy, receipt of at least 3 sessions within 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent and parent self-report (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number analyzed were adolescents who either themselves or had their parent indicate that they were referred for psychotherapy.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence15 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence14 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence

Out of adolescents who are referred for psychotherapy, receipt of at least 3 sessions within the past 3 months (yes/no) measured by adolescent, parent self-report and electronic health record review (yes if any are yes, no if all are no). The metric reported will be percentage of individuals per study arm with a 'yes' result.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Number analyzed were adolescents who either themselves or had their parent indicate that they were referred for psychotherapy.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareQuality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence11 Participants
MoodRingQuality of Depression Management: Therapy Adherence17 Participants
Secondary

Self-Efficacy at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (MHSES) The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (Clarke, 2014) measures one's belief in one's capability to perform mental health self-care behaviors. The score ranges from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher confidence in mental health selfcare.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSelf-Efficacy at 3 Months33.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
MoodRingSelf-Efficacy at 3 Months35.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Secondary

Self-Efficacy at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (MHSES) The Mental Health Self-efficacy Scale (Clarke, 2014) measures one's belief in one's capability to perform mental health self-care behaviors. The score ranges from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher confidence in mental health selfcare.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescents

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSelf-Efficacy at 6 Months37.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.32
MoodRingSelf-Efficacy at 6 Months39.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.56
Secondary

Self-management Behavior at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked based on Question 12 of Partners in Health Scale about self-management behavior. This question asks the average amount of time (options including Daily, More than once a week, Once a week, Once a month, Once a semester, Once a year, Less than once a year, Never) spent in potentially useful self-management activities. Each time category will be described by a percentage. Each of the following are asked individually: (1) created to-do lists to help me focus; (2) found strategies to create pleasurable distractions; (3) engaged in some physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.); (4) set realistic short-term goals; (5) made sure I had a good day/night routine with got enough sleep; (6) ensured enough rest to avoid getting exhausted; (7) left the house regularly; (8) ate healthy A higher score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusMore than Once a Week3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a Week3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a month7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a semester (3-4 months)4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusLess than once a year4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsDaily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a Week9 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a semester (3-4 months)3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsLess than once a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)More than Once a Week8 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a Week9 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a month4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Less than once a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Never0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsDaily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsMore than Once a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a Week1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a month7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a semester (3-4 months)9 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a year2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepDaily1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepMore than Once a Week10 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a month3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a semester (3-4 months)4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a year2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedDaily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a month1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyDaily5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a month3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyDaily4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyMore than Once a Week14 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a month1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusDaily4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsMore than Once a Week7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a month3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Daily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedMore than Once a Week7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a Week9 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a semester (3-4 months)4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a year2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyMore than Once a Week12 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedMore than Once a Week8 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusDaily5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a semester (3-4 months)3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusMore than Once a Week3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a Week5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a month0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a semester (3-4 months)3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyLess than once a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusOnce a year3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a month5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusNever6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsDaily5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsMore than Once a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a Week3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a month7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsCreated to-do lists to help me focusLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedLess than once a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsLess than once a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyDaily9 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyMore than Once a Week10 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)More than Once a Week1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a Week2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a month1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Daily11 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a Week10 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Less than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Never0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a year2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsDaily4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyLess than once a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsMore than Once a Week3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsLeft the house regularyNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a Week7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyDaily3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepMore than Once a Week8 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyMore than Once a Week12 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepLess than once a year2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsLess than once a year2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a Week4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsNever3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedDaily2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepDaily4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsAte healthyOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 3 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a month2 Participants
Secondary

Self-management Behavior at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked based on Question 12 of Partners in Health Scale about self-management behavior. This question asks the average amount of time (options including Daily, More than once a week, Once a week, Once a month, Once a semester, Once a year, Less than once a year, Never) spent in potentially useful self-management activities. Each of the following are asked individually: (1) created to-do lists to help me focus; (2) found strategies to create pleasurable distractions; (3) engaged in some physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.); (4) set realistic short-term goals; (5) made sure I had a good day/night routine with got enough sleep; (6) ensured enough rest to avoid getting exhausted; (7) left the house regularly; (8) ate healthy

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescents

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusMore than Once a Week2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a month3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a semester (3-4 months)3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusLess than once a year2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsDaily3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsMore than Once a Week4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a Week7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a month3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsLess than once a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Daily6 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)More than Once a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a Week3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a month5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Less than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Never0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsDaily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsMore than Once a Week4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a Week2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a month4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a semester (3-4 months)5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a year2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepDaily2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a month6 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a semester (3-4 months)3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepNever1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedDaily3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedMore than Once a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyDaily4 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a Week5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyDaily5 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyMore than Once a Week6 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusDaily3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a Week6 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepMore than Once a Week3 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a Week2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a month7 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedLess than once a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyMore than Once a Week11 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a month0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyNever0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a Week6 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a month2 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a year1 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyLess than once a year0 Participants
Usual CareSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusMore than Once a Week3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a Week1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a month3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusOnce a year3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyDaily3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedDaily1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedNever1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsMore than Once a Week5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedMore than Once a Week7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyDaily10 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyMore than Once a Week9 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a Week2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyMore than Once a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Daily6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)More than Once a Week4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a month1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a Week7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a Week4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a month1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusLess than once a year2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsDaily7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Once a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a Week3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Less than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsOnce a month4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEngaged in some moderate physical activity (cycling, walking, etc.)Never0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsDaily5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsMore than Once a Week4 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsFound strategies to create pleasurable distractionsNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a semester (3-4 months)2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyOnce a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsOnce a year1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a Week8 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsAte healthyOnce a month1 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsSet realistic short-term goalsNever0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepDaily3 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepMore than Once a Week7 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 Monthsto help me focusDaily5 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a Week6 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsEnsured enough rest to avoid getting exhaustedOnce a semester (3-4 months)0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a month2 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsLeft the house regularlyLess than once a year0 Participants
MoodRingSelf-management Behavior at 6 MonthsMade sure I had a good day/night routine and got enough sleepOnce a semester (3-4 months)1 Participants
Secondary

Sleep Disturbance at 3 Months

Adolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Disturbance scale. This scale has four questions, the second (sleeping through the night) being reverse-scored, with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep disturbance.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSleep Disturbance at 3 Months13.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
MoodRingSleep Disturbance at 3 Months13.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.67
Secondary

Sleep Disturbance at 6 Months

Adolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep Disturbance scale. This scale has four questions, the second (sleeping through the night) being reverse-scored, with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep disturbance.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescent

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSleep Disturbance at 6 Months13.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
MoodRingSleep Disturbance at 6 Months13.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
Secondary

Sleep-Related Impairment at 3 Months

Adolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep-Related Impairment scale. This scale has four questions with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 19 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep-related impairment.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSleep-Related Impairment at 3 Months13.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.85
MoodRingSleep-Related Impairment at 3 Months13.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.81
Secondary

Sleep-Related Impairment at 6 Months

Adolescents will respond to the PROMIS Pediatric Sleep-Related Impairment scale. This scale has four questions with response options of never, almost never, sometimes, almost always, and always, ranges from 4 to 19 with higher scores indicating higher levels of sleep-related impairment.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescents

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSleep-Related Impairment at 6 Months12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
MoodRingSleep-Related Impairment at 6 Months13.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Secondary

Social Support at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Scale (Sherbourne, 1991) measures types of social support. Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and the total score is averaged and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher levels associated with greater support.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSocial Support at 3 Months3.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
MoodRingSocial Support at 3 Months4.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
Secondary

Social Support at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey The Medical Outcome Study Social Support Scale (Sherbourne, 1991) measures types of social support. Each item ranges from 1 to 5 and the total score is averaged and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher levels associated with greater support.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Adolescents

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareSocial Support at 6 Months4.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
MoodRingSocial Support at 6 Months4.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of MoodRing: Adolescent/Parent Acceptability

System Usability Questionnaire (Bangor, 2008) asks 11 questions about the usability of a technological intervention. SUS scores 0-100. Higher scores indicate better usability. Adolescents and Parents - only those randomized to the MoodRing arm - will be asked these questions.

Time frame: at 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of MoodRing as a Clinical Tool: Heathcare Provider Acceptability

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (Weiner, 2017) asks 4 questions on a 1-5 Likert scale with completely disagree to completely agree with regards to acceptability of an intervention and 3 questions were added including with regards to efficiency, help taking care of patients, patient benefit from the intervention. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Also an open-ended question will be asked about feedback using MoodRing.

Time frame: at 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of MoodRing as a Self-management Tool: Adolescent/Parent Acceptability

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (Weiner, 2017) asks 4 questions on a 1-5 Likert scale with completely disagree to completely agree with regards to acceptability of an intervention. Additional questions will be asked about perceived benefit, taking care of mental health, and confidence in mental health management. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability. Also an open-ended question will be asked about feedback using MoodRing. Adolescents and Parents - only those randomized to the MoodRing arm - will be asked these questions.

Time frame: at 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Acceptability of MoodRing: Heathcare Provider Acceptability

System Usability Questionnaire (Bangor, 2008) asks 11 questions about the usability of a technological intervention. SUS scores range from 0-100. Higher scores indicate better usability.

Time frame: at 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Anxiety Severity at 3 Months

Adolescents will be asked the GAD-7 Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item Questionnaire measures extent of anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating greater severity.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Anxiety Severity at 6 Months

Adolescents will be asked the GAD-7 Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7-item Questionnaire measures extent of anxiety symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating greater severity.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Parent-Teen Communication Quality at 3 Months

M-PACS (The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (Olson, 1985) modified for mental health) asks 20 questions with regards to communication between parents and adolescents, with responses 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Some items are reverse scored with a higher scale score indicating better communication. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Parent-Teen Communication Quality at 6 Months

M-PACS (The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (Olson, 1985) modified for mental health) asks 20 questions with regards to communication between parents and adolescents, with responses 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Some items are reverse scored with a higher scale score indicating better communication. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Parent-Teen Relationship Quality at 3 Months

The CPCS (Child Parent Connectedness Scale) asks 5 questions from a scale of 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree with regards to connectedness and relationship satisfaction with each other. A higher score indicates higher child-parent connectedness. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Parent-Teen Relationship Quality at 6 Months

The CPCS (Child Parent Connectedness Scale) asks 5 questions from a scale of 1-5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree with regards to connectedness and relationship satisfaction with each other. A higher score indicates higher child-parent connectedness. Both adolescents and parents will be asked these questions.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Perceived Need for Service Use at 3 Months

The General-practice Users Perceived-need Inventory (GUPI) The General-Practice Users Perceived-Need Inventory (McNab, 2004) will be used to measure perceived need for treatment. There is no scoring. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's need for mental health services. The response will be evaluated by the total number of individuals who agree that they would like to or are already getting help with a) medication and b) counseling as comapred to those who respond they do not need this kind of help.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Perceived Need for Service Use at 6 Months

The General-practice Users Perceived-need Inventory (GUPI) The General-Practice Users Perceived-Need Inventory (McNab, 2004) will be used to measure perceived need for treatment. There is no scoring. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's need for mental health services. The response will be evaluated by the total number of individuals who agree that they would like to or are already getting help with a) medication and b) counseling as comapred to those who respond they do not need this kind of help.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Perceived Severity at 3 Months

Rating scale of General Mental Health A rating scale of General Mental Health (Cadigan, 2018) will be used with two questions each ranging from 1 to 5 with regard to a self-rating of general mental health. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's mental health.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Perceived Severity at 6 Months

Rating scale of General Mental Health A rating scale of General Mental Health (Cadigan, 2018) will be used with two questions each ranging from 1 to 5 with regard to a self-rating of general mental health. Adolescents will be asked this and parents about their perception of their adolescent's mental health.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Sleep Habits at 3 Months

Adolescents will respond to the School Based Sleep Habits Survey-Child Form which asks 43 questions about weekday and weeknight sleep patterns, sleep awakenings, and sleep time preferences.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Sleep Habits at 6 Months

Adolescents will respond to the School Based Sleep Habits Survey-Child Form which asks 43 questions about weekday and weeknight sleep patterns, sleep awakenings, and sleep time preferences.

Time frame: 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Suicidal Thoughts

Adolescents who respond with anything besides none to the 9th question of the PHQ-9 will be asked to complete the brief CSSR-S scale. This scale asks two questions, have you (the participant) wished you (the participant) were dead or wished you (the participant) could go to sleep and not wake up? (yes/no) and have you (the participant) actually had any thoughts of killing yourself? (yes/no). Positive answers indicate suicidal thinking. These will be asked on an online survey. Those adolescents responding positively will complete a full CSSR-S interview.

Time frame: 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Suicidal Thoughts

Adolescents who respond with anything besides none to the 9th question of the PHQ-9 will be asked to complete the brief CSSR-S scale. This scale asks two questions, have you (the participant) wished you (the participant) were dead or wished you (the participant) could go to sleep and not wake up? (yes/no) and have you (the participant) actually had any thoughts of killing yourself? (yes/no). Positive answers indicate suicidal thinking. These will be asked on an online survey. Those adolescents responding positively will complete a full CSSR-S interview.

Time frame: 6 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026