Skip to content

The Effect of Natural Carbonated Mineral Water Consumption on Gastrointestinal Transit and Gut Microbiota - A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effect of Natural Carbonated Mineral Water Consumption on Gastrointestinal Transit and Gut Microbiota - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05375487
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-05-16
Start date
2023-04-05
Completion date
2023-11-20
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Discomfort

Brief summary

Gastrointestinal discomfort is a common condition associated with aging, low levels of physical activity, and reduced intake of fibre, water, and magnesium. Several studies have reported a positive association between the consumption of hyper-mineral water containing high levels of bicarbonate, calcium, or magnesium and improvements in gastrointestinal transit. There is evidence that magnesium and sulphate, individually, exert a laxative effect; however, the impact of other minerals remains limited. Different mechanisms have been described to explain how the gut microbiota influences gastrointestinal transit. It is important to understand the characteristics of the gut microbiota and to determine whether the intake of hyper-mineral water, a natural source of minerals, can positively modulate it. The aim of this randomized, placebo-controlled trial is to evaluate the effects of carbonated mineral water consumption on gastrointestinal transit and gut microbiota composition.

Interventions

OTHERNatural Carbonated Mineral Water

Participants consume 1000 mL per day of natural carbonated mineral water for 4 weeks, divided into four portions: before breakfast, 30 minutes before lunch, during the afternoon, and 30 minutes before dinner. Any additional water intake, if desired, is provided by the study investigators and consists exclusively of low-mineral water in both study arms. Participants record their total weekly water consumption using an electronic form.

OTHERLow Mineral Water

Participants consume 1000 mL per day of low-mineral water for 4 weeks, divided into four portions: before breakfast, 30 minutes before lunch, during the afternoon, and 30 minutes before dinner. Any additional water intake, if desired, is provided by the study investigators and consists exclusively of low-mineral water in both study arms. Participants record their total weekly water consumption using an electronic form.

Sponsors

Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Lead SponsorOTHER
CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 years * History of gastrointestinal discomfort * Not using any laxative drug for 3 days before the screening visit * Drinking 1.0 ± 0.5 L of water per day * Accepting and signing the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment or disease (current or past) likely to interfere with evaluation of the study parameters * Taking antibiotics in the 3 months preceding the recruitment visit * Taking supplements or any food enriched with or containing bacteria or yeasts likely to have an effect on the gastrointestinal tract, particularly on intestinal transit, digestive comfort, gas production, or the occurrence of abdominal pain, in the 30 days preceding the recruitment visit (these products will also be banned during the study period) * Subject having an alcohol consumption of more than 3 glasses of wine per day, or 2 glasses of beer per day, or 1 glass of hard liquor per day * Subject having a coffee consumption greater than 5 cups per day * Subject with constipation attributable to an organic or anatomical cause (Hirschsprung's disease, hypothyroidism, mental deficiency, psychiatric illness, neurological abnormalities, history of operation of the colon or anus, colorectal cancer, anemia, etc.) * Subject with a history of current gastrointestinal pathology or disorder such as duodenal ulcer, chronic colitis, or chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), celiac disease, or irritable bowel syndrome * Subject having a history of operation of the digestive tract * Subject having undergone surgery in the two months preceding the recruitment visit * Subject having undergone bariatric surgery * Having participated in a weight loss program (with a 5-10% weight loss) in the last 3 months prior to the recruitment visit * Body mass index \> 35 kg/m² * Taking supplements of magnesium, vitamins, or other minerals during the study period * Intake of other carbonated mineral waters beyond the provided water during the study period * Pregnancy * Participation in another clinical trial during the last 30 days prior to the recruitment visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in gastrointestinal transit from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in gastrointestinal transit measured by the percentage of responder subjects defined as a composite score of the two following Rome IV criteria: number of stools ≥ 4 or an increase of 2 stools/week and stools consistency with less than 25% of lumpy to hard stools.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in stool consistency from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in stool consistency measured using Bristol scale.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in constipation symptoms from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in constipation symptoms measured using a validated PAC-SYM questionnaire. PAC-SYM is a 12-item, self-administered questionnaire used to measure severity of symptoms over the past 2 weeks in patients with constipation. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PAC-SYM for Portugal was performed by Mapi Research.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in constipation Quality of Life from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in constipation Quality of Life measured using a validated PAC-QOL questionnaire. PAC-QOL questionnaire is a 28-item self-administered questionnaire that is being used to measure health-related quality of life (over the past 2 weeks) in patients with chronic constipation. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PAC-QOL for Portugal was performed by Mapi Research Trust.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in Perceived Stress Scale from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in constipation Perceived Stress Scale measured using a validated Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire. A validated Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) self-administered questionnaire with 13-item will be used to measure perceived stress of respondents during the last month (Portuguese version keeps 13 of the 14 original items). The PSS questionnaire has been demonstrated to have internal consistency, reproducibility, validity, and sensitivity. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PSS for Portugal was implemented by Pais-Ribeiro \& Marques (2009).
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in gut microbiota from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksBacterial DNA will be extracted from fecal samples. 16SRNA gene will be sequenced by next-generation sequencing (NGS). All the identified bacterial phyla, genus and species will be expressed in percentage.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in short-chain fatty acid profiling from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in short-chain fatty acid profiling evaluated by the faeces concentration of short-chain fatty acids before and after intervention.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in urinary excretion of minerals from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in urinary excretion of minerals evaluated by the K+, Na+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ excretion before and after intervention.
Difference between the intervention and control group in the change in urinary pH from baseline to the end of follow-up (4 weeks).4 weeksChange in urinary pH evaluated by the urine pH before and after intervention.

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORConceição Calhau, PhD

NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa

STUDY_DIRECTORAndré Rosário, PhD

NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa

STUDY_DIRECTORInês Mota

NOVA Medical School | Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026