Skip to content

Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation

The Effect of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05374083
Enrollment
18
Registered
2022-05-16
Start date
2022-07-31
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2022-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Brief summary

The aim of this trial is to compare the effect of autogenous demineralized dentin block graft (ADDBG) versus particulate deproteinized bovine bone graft (PDBBG) on alveolar ridge preservation after extraction of non-restorable single rooted teeth

Detailed description

Many studies have reported an approximately 50% reduction in alveolar bone both the horizontal and vertical directions over 12 months with more than two-thirds of the reduction occurring in the first three months after extraction. Alveolar ridge preservation is a procedure that attempts to reduce bone dimensional changes that naturally take place following tooth extraction. During the last decade, efforts have been made to confirm procedures that can prevent bone resorption after extraction. The use of bone grafts aim to promote bone healing and assist bone regeneration. Various types of materials are used for socket preservation, such as autogenous bone, allograft bone, xenograft materials, and alloplast materials. The deproteinized bovine bone has been tested in vitro and in vivo in the alveolar ridge preservation and plays a positive role in osteoconductive function. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure has been developed to counteract alveolar ridge bone resorption. GBR technology with xenografts, such as the deproteinized bovine bone mineral, could lead to bone regeneration. Moreover, root dentin block is composed of Type I collagen matrix with several osteoinductive non-collagenous proteins such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and dentin matrix proteins. Geometrically, alveolar bone morphology was maintained by dentin block graft as well as it has micropores (dentinal tubules) of 3-5 μm diameter and macropores of 0.2-0.3 mm diameter for enhancing osteoinductive and osteoconductive functions. Both demineralized dentin block and particulate deproteinized bovine bone grafts with or without collagen membrane have been utilized for alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation but the superiority of one form over the other is not yet clear

Interventions

Atraumatic extraction of non restorable tooth, then the extracted tooth will be prepared and demineralized by hydrochloric acid (HCL) acid and inserted as demineralized dentin block graft in the socket

PROCEDUREAlveolar ridge preservation using particulate deproteinized bovine bone graft

Atraumatic extraction of non restorable tooth, then the socket will be packed by particulate deproteinized bovine bone

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Non-restorable tooth indicated for extraction * Single-rooted teeth * Motivated patients, agree to sign informed consent and complete the follow-up period

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females * active infection at extraction site * Smokers * systemic conditions affecting healing (e.g. diabetes, medications as bisphosphonates...)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alveolar ridge bucco-lingual width change in mm6 monthsAlveolar bone linear width will be measured at baseline and after 6 months using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The change in bone width will be calculated as the subtraction of final width from baseline width and will be measured in millimetres

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alveolar ridge apico-coronal height change in mm6 monthsDifference in height linear measurement between baseline and final CBCT scans
Histological assessment6 monthsBone samples from control and intervention sites will be taken during implant placement using a trephine bur of a size smaller than the implant. Samples will be examined for new bone formation (Yes/no).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Talaat, Master Degree
Mohamed.Talaat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201009174617

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026