Skip to content

Myopia-control Efficacy by Peripheral Defocus Lens (PDL)

Evaluation of Visual Performance and Myopia-control Efficacy Afforded by Bestivue Peripheral Defocus Lens (PDL)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05373693
Enrollment
160
Registered
2022-05-13
Start date
2019-07-01
Completion date
2022-09-30
Last updated
2022-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Progressive

Brief summary

The proposed study below aims to assess the effect of customized Bestivue PDL lenses on retinal image quality and myopia control. A total of 160 subjected would be enrolled in and randomized to allcoate into four groups. Visual acuity and image blur at various gaze directions and eccentricities on children fitted with +2 to 4 D power and single vision lenses would be measured to assess the short term effect of PDL lens. Axial length and cycloplegic objective refractive error would be measured to assess the Myopia-control Efficacy.

Detailed description

The proposed study below aims to assess the short-term and long-term effect of customized Bestivue PDL lenses on retinal image quality and myopia control. To these ends, two stages of testing are planned. First, objective testing will be utilized to assess the effect of Bestivue PDL lenses on visual acuity and image blur at various gaze directions and eccentricities on 4- to 13-year-old children fitted with +2 to 4 D power and single vision lenses.In the second stage, the same children participants will wear either single or Bestvue PDL lenses with one of the four plus power designs for 2 years. Their corrected visual acuity, objective refractive error with dilation and axial length will be assessed for each eye every six months for two years. Outcomes of these studies should inform whether Bestivue PDL lenses are effective in myopia control while affording adequate visual comfort and performance.

Interventions

Wear single vision lens

DEVICE+2D PDL

Wear Peripheral defocus lense with +2D

DEVICE+3D PDL

Wear Peripheral defocus lense with +3D

DEVICE+4D PDL

Wear Peripheral defocus lense with +4D

Sponsors

Tianjin Eye Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subjects had spherical RE of -1.00 to -6.00 D * Astigmatism ≤ 4.00 D * Anisometropia ≤ 1.50 D\\ * Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) equal to or better than logMAR 0.0 (20/20) in both eyes.

Exclusion criteria

* Strabismus * Ocular limitations * Systemic abnormalities affecting vision and ocular motility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in cycloplegic objective spherical equivalent (SER)baseline, 24 monthschanges in cycloplegic objective spherical equivalent (SER) from baseline between four groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes in ocular axial lengthbaseline, 24 monthsChanges in ocular axial length from baseline between four groups.
visual performance1 dayThe visual acuity of peripheral between four groups.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026