Skip to content

Effect of Repeated Feedback to Registered Nurses Pain Nursing Documentation

Effect of Repeated Feedback to RNs' Pain Nursing Documentation: A Cluster Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05373641
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-05-13
Start date
2022-03-04
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Nurse's Role, Pain

Keywords

RN, Pain nursing, Pain assessment, Pain management, Pain documentation, Audit and feedback, Education, Randomized Controlled Trial, Nursing sensitive quality, Nursing sensitive outcomes

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to find out how pain nursing documentation audit and educational feedback effect to RN's pain nursing documentation, the average level of pain nursing documentation knowledge of unit RN's, patient satisfaction of pain management and number of pain nursing incident reports. In addition, how background variables are related to the pain nursing documentation. Research hypothesis: Pain nursing documentation audit and educational feedback increased RNs' pain nursing documentation and knowledge, patient satisfaction to pain management and effect to number of pain nursing incident reports.

Interventions

OTHERRepeated feedback

Repeated feedback monthly based on previous month pain documentation audit results.

OTHERPain documentation audit

Monthly pain documentation audit

Sponsors

University of Eastern Finland
CollaboratorOTHER
Kuopio University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Units serve as a statistical units. Number of units 30, number of individual participants 800-1000.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Registered nurses (RN) who work at the Kuopio University Hospital in units of which patients potentially require pain management.

Exclusion criteria

* Professionals other than RN * RN who do not use pain management strategies in their work

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in RNs' pain documentationBaseline (T0), month 1 (T1), month 2 (T2), month 3 (T3), month 4 (T4), month 5 (T5) month 6 (T6), month 7 (T7), month 8 (T8)MEASUREMENT TOOL: Structured audit frame to evaluate pain assessment and management documentation. UNIT OF MEASURE: Information is collected as follows from EHR 1. Patient pain documented in the care chart 2. Patient need for pain management documented 3. Patient pain management goal documented 4. Patient pain assessment 5. Patient pain assessment in the previous 24 hours 6. Patient pain 7. Use of pain assessment tool 8. Non-pharmacological methods 9. Pharmacological interventions 10. Intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmacological effect assessment) Multiple measurements are aggregated to achieve one declared value as follows: First, each evaluated area results in 0 (not fulfilled) or 1 point (fulfilled). Second, the points are summed. Third, the sum is transformed to a 0-100 scale and reported as a single value reflecting pain documentation quality.
Change in RNs' pain knowledgeBaseline (T0), month 3 (T3), month (T7)Pain knowledge questionnaire used in three time points

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient satisfaction of pain managementBefore intervention (T0), month 3 (T3), month 6 (T6), month 8 (T8)Nursing patient feedback questionnaire analyzed at two time points
Change in number of pain nursing incident reportsBefore intervention (T0), month 8 (T8)Pain nursing incident reports analyzed at two time points

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026