Skip to content

Effect of Vitamin D and Denosumab on Bone Remodelling in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Vitamin D Improves Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women With Denosumab Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05372224
Enrollment
55
Registered
2022-05-12
Start date
2020-06-22
Completion date
2021-06-22
Last updated
2023-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypovitaminosis D, Menopause, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal

Keywords

Vitamin D, Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Denosumab, Hypovitaminosis D, Osteoporosis, Osteopenia

Brief summary

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANKL ligand, which is used as an alternative treatment for osteoporosis in patients who have a poor response to first-line antiresorptive therapy. However, discontinuation of denosumab produces a rapid increase in bone turnover, bone loss and potentially increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures.

Detailed description

76 postmenopausal women from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital 1o de Octubre of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE) were firstly considered, of which 23 presented elimination criteria and only 55 who had received denosumab therapy for an average of 2.5 years without a significant improvement in hip and lumbar spine T-scores were enrolled. First, a general medical evaluation was performed. Serum levels of vitamin D were analysed to find the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D. A bone mineral density test was done to calculate hip and lumbar spine T-scores. Then, vitamin D was administrated daily for one year at a dose of 4,000 IU and the studies were repeated after one year. Statistical analysis was performed using PAST 3.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. software. The arithmetic median (µ) and standard deviation (S.D.) were calculated using Excel-Word. Graphics were constructed with GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 and tables with Excel Word. Categorical variables were analysed with chi-squared or Fisher exact test depending on the number of participants in each cell. Normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare two paired samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized. The assigned α value for this study was \<0.05. In all cases, if a Montecarlo permutation was available, the exact p-value was taken instead of the raw p-value.

Interventions

DRUGCholecalciferol

4000 IU were administrated once a day for 3 months.

Sponsors

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER
National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

76 participants were considered from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital 1o de Octubre of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE), of which 23 presented elimination criteria, and 55 were included in the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteopenia in treatment with denosumab 60mg every six months plus calcium carbonate 1.2g/day + vitamin D 800IU/day. * Diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D, with serum cholecalciferol values \<30ng/dL.

Exclusion criteria

* Incomplete clinical records or clinical records. * Age over 90 years. * Diagnosis of secondary (hereditary) osteoporosis. * History of prolonged use of steroids. * Lack of adherence to medical treatment. * Diagnosis of cancer. * Diagnosis of depression. * Diagnosis of Celiac disease or with the presence of alterations in intestinal absorption. * Allergies to any of the medications administered.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with clinical remission of hypovitaminosis D at 12 months12 monthsRemission of hypovitaminosis D was considered when serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D \[25(OH)D\] were above 29 pg/ml.
Number of participants with normal hip T-score at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score below -1 three months after treatment.
Number of participants with normal lumbar spine T-score at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score below -1 three months after treatment.
Number of participants with improvement in serum levels of vitamin D at 12 months12 monthsImprovement in serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D \[25(OH)D\] was considered when serum vitamin D levels increased concerning baseline levels.
Number of participants with hip T-score improvement at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants who improved their hip T-score at three months after treatment.
Number of participants with lumbar spine T-score improvement at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants who improved their lumbar spine T-score at three months after treatment.
Number of participants with osteoporosis of the hip at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score above -2.5 three months after treatment.
Number of participants with osteoporosis of the lumbar spine at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score greater than -2.5 three months after treatment.
Number of participants with osteopenia on the hip at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score from -1 to -2.4 three months after treatment.
Number of participants with osteopenia of the lumbar spine at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score from -1 to -2.4 three months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with vitamin D insufficiency at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D of 21 to 29 pg/ml after three months of treatment.
Number of participants with vitamin D deficiency at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D less than 20 pg/ml after three months of treatment.
Number of participants with vitamin D sufficiency at 12 months12 monthsIt refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D above 29 pg/ml after three months of treatment.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026