Skip to content

Domiciliary Management of Dental Erosion in Patients With GERD With Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite

Management of Dental Erosion in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite Toothpaste

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05371717
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-05-12
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2024-09-20
Last updated
2024-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Erosion, Gastro Esophageal Reflux

Keywords

biomimetic hydroxyapatite, remineralization

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to evaluate dental erosion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients consenting to participate to the study will undergo periodontal evaluation at the baseline. Then, professional dental hygiene will be performed. Patients will be randomly assigned to: * Trial group: home oral hygiene with Biorepair Total Protection + Biorepair Shock Treatment twice a day * Control group: home oral hygiene with Biorepair Total Protection Patients will be evaluated after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from baseline.

Detailed description

The aim of the present study is to evaluate dental erosion in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients consenting to participate to the study will undergo periodontal evaluation at the baseline. Then, professional dental hygiene will be performed. Patients will be randomly assigned to: * Trial group: home oral hygiene with Biorepair Total Protection + Biorepair Shock Treatment twice a day * Control group: home oral hygiene with Biorepair Total Protection Patients will be evaluated after 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months from baseline.

Interventions

OTHERDomiciliary use of Biorepair Total Protection + Biorepair Shock Treatment

Domiciliary use of Biorepair Total Protection twice a day for oral hygiene + Biorepair Shock Treatment application for 10 min once a day.

Domiciliary use of Biorepair Total Protection twice a day for oral hygiene + Biorepair Shock Treatment application for 10 min once a day.

Sponsors

University of Pavia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with dental erosion * no proton pumps before pH examination

Exclusion criteria

* no dental erosion * neurological and psychiatric diseases; * pregnant and/or breastfeeding women; * patients with poor compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of BEWE (Basic Erosive Wear Examination)Study begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineScoring criteria (Barlet et al., 2008): * 0: no erosive tooth wear; * 1: initial loss of surface texture; * 2: distinct defect, hard tissue loss \< 50% of the surface area; * 3: hard tissue loss ≥ 50% of the surface area. IntactTooth smartphone application will be used to calculate this index.
Change in Schiff Air Index - Dental sensitivity testStudy begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineScoring criteria: 0: the subject did not respond to air blasting; 1. the subject responded to air blasting; 2. the subject responded to air blasting and requested discontinuation; 3. the subject responded to air blasting, requested discontinuation and considered the stimulus to be painful.
Change in Plaque Index (PI% - O' Leary Index)Study begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineEvaluation of the presence of plaque on the 4 surfaces of teeth on the total amount of dental surfaces. Formula = n ° sites with plaque / total n ° of dental surfaces x100
Change in Bleeding Score (BS - Mombelli et al.)Study begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineScoring criteria: 0: no bleeding 1. isolated visible spots 2. blood forms a confluent red line on the mucosal margin 3. profuse and copious bleeding
Laryngopharyngeal pH monitoringStudy begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineData was collected wirelessly for 24 hours and then analysed. Length, severity and number of reflux episodes were calculated. The RYAN score was used to evaluate for laryngopharyngeal acid reflux and was calculated for both the upright and supine positions. A RYAN score \>9.4 in the upright position or \>6.8 in the supine position was considered positive. Patients with a positive RYAN score in either the upright or supine positions were considered positive for laryngopharyngeal acid reflux.
Erosion risk levelStudy begin, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the baselineFor each sextant, the highest BEWE value will be chosen. A mean of all the sextant values will be performed to calculate erosion risk level. IntactTooth smartphone application will be used to calculate this index.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026