Skip to content

Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes of Anatomy Based Fitting in Patients Implanted by Robot Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery (RACIS)

Audiological and Quality of Life Outcomes of Anatomy Based Fitting in Patients Implanted by Robot Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery (RACIS)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05369598
Acronym
RACIS ABF
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-05-11
Start date
2022-03-01
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2023-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cochlear Implants, Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral

Brief summary

Severe to profound hearing loss affects 0,8% of the global population. For these people, a conventional hearing aid often does not provide sufficient benefit. However, these people can benefit from a cochlear implant (CI). A CI needs to be individually programmed (fitted) for each recipient. A fitting map is defined as a set of electrical parameters that are individually adapted to a recipient's needs to achieve optimal sound perception. At present, most CI recipients are fitted with a default frequency allocation map that doesn't take individual variability in size and shape of the cochlea into account. In this study, a fitting strategy based on the post-operative CT scan, that will allow the audiologist to set a frequency-band distribution for CI fitting that may be more closely aligned to the natural tonotopic frequency distribution of a normal hearing cochlea, will be evaluated. This study will focus on patients that are already implanted with the HEARO robotic system.

Interventions

DEVICEPost-operative ABF followed by fitting according to clinical standard

Cochlear implant will be fitted first with anatomy-based fitting for 6 months and followed by default fitting for 2 months.

DEVICEFitting according to clinical standard followed by post-operative ABF

Cochlear implant will be fitted first with default fitting for 6 months and followed by anatomy-based fitting for 2 months.

Sponsors

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Post-lingual onset of severe to profound sensory-neural hearing loss in the implanted ear(s) * Subject implanted by Robot Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery (RACIS) * Subject implanted with MED-EL cochlear implant(s) with Flex28, Flex 26 or FlexSoft electrode to obtain maximum cochlear coverage * Subject planned to receive a MED-EL SONNET 2 or RONDO 3 audio processor on the newly implanted side * Subject is either a user with unilateral implantation, bilateral implantation or a bimodal CI user (unilateral CI user with contralateral ear adequately fitted with a hearing aid) * Pre- operative and post-operative CT scan of the temporal bone available * Pre-operative result of pure-tone audiometry, speech test in quiet and in noise available * Audio processor not yet activated on the newly implanted side * Minimum of 10 active channels can be activated * Fluent in the language of the test centre (Dutch or French) * Signed and dated ICF before the start of any study-specific procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is a Single-Sided Deafness (SSD) CI user * Subject is an Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) user (with an EAS audio processor) * Lack of compliance with any inclusion criteria * Anything that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk or preclude the subject's full compliance with or completion of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Speech recognition in noise: Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) in dB SNR3 months post- activation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech recognition in quiet: Percentage correctly identified phonemes3 months post-activation
Speech discrimination: Number of correctly discriminated pairs of phonemes3 months post- activation
Pure-tone audiometry with CI: Hearing thresholds between 125Hz and 8 kHz (dB HL)1 month post- activation
Patient reported outcome: Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ): Total score and score in the physical, psychological and social domain8 months post- activationThe physical domain comprises three subdomains, namely Basic sound perception, Advanced sound perception, and Speech production. The Psychological domain contains the subdomain Self-esteem and the Social domain handles questions about Activity limitations and Social interactions. Each subdomain covers 10 statements. Each statement is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from Never to Always (Statement 1-55) or from No to Quite well (Statement 56-60). Scores for the subdomains will be computed by transforming the answer categories (1-5) for all items: 1 = 0, 2 = 25, 3 = 50, 4 = 75, and 5 = 100 and by adding together the 10-item scores of each subdomain and dividing by the number of completed items. For each subdomain, the score ranges between 0-100 and a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Patient reported outcome- Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12): Total score and score in the speech, spatial and quality domainBaseline at activationThe 12 items of this questionnaire are rated on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 and the overall score is calculated by taking the average of the scores on these 12 items.For the overall score and the score on each subdomain, the score ranges between 0-10 and a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Patient reported outcome- Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI): Total score and classification of self-perceived auditory benefitBaseline at activationThe 19 items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from always (99%) to never (1%). To calculate the overall score the corresponding numerical value of each item (from always = 7 to never = 1) is added. Uncompleted items and the response option not applicable correspond to 0 in this calculation. A total score of less than 30, 30-59, 60-89, 90-109, and 110-133 is respectively classified as a very poor, poor, moderate, good, and very good self-perceived auditory benefit.
Patient reported outcome- Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ): Total score and score in the physical, psychological and social domainBaseline at activationThe physical domain comprises three subdomains, namely Basic sound perception, Advanced sound perception, and Speech production. The Psychological domain contains the subdomain Self-esteem and the Social domain handles questions about Activity limitations and Social interactions. Each subdomain covers 10 statements. Each statement is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from Never to Always (Statement 1-55) or from No to Quite well (Statement 56-60). Scores for the subdomains will be computed by transforming the answer categories (1-5) for all items: 1 = 0, 2 = 25, 3 = 50, 4 = 75, and 5 = 100 and by adding together the 10-item scores of each subdomain and dividing by the number of completed items.For each subdomain, the score ranges between 0-100 and a higher score indicates a better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of electrode contact location: Degrees of deviation8th months post activation

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactEmilie Heuninck
emilie.heuninck@uzbrussel.be024749772

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026