Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Contezolid Acefosamil and Contezolid Compared to Linezolid Administered Intravenously and Orally to Adults With Moderate or Severe Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI)

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Contezolid Acefosamil and Contezolid Compared to Linezolid Administered Intravenously and Orally to Adults With Moderate or Severe Diabetic Foot Infections (DFI)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05369052
Enrollment
865
Registered
2022-05-11
Start date
2022-05-03
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Infection

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, safety and efficacy study of contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) compared with linezolid (IV and PO) administered for a total of 14 to 28 days in adult subjects with moderate or severe DFI.

Detailed description

Approximately 865 subjects (519 contezolid acefosamil/contezolid: 346 linezolid) will be enrolled with moderate or severe DFI that are confirmed or suspected to be due to a Gram-positive bacterial pathogen (MITT analysis set).

Interventions

DRUGcontezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO)

Contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) administered for a total of 14 to 28 days (28 to 56 doses)

Linezolid (IV and PO) administered for a total of 14 to 28 days (28 to 56 doses)

Sponsors

MicuRx
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2) per the American Diabetes Association criteria * Have a foot infection that started at or below the malleolus and does not extend above the knee * Foot infection that meets the IWGDF DFI criteria for classification 3 (moderate infection) or 4 (severe infection) * Foot infection had acute onset or worsening of signs and symptoms within the past 14 days

Exclusion criteria

* Previous DFI known or suspected to be caused by Gram-positive pathogens that are resistant to oxazolidinone antibiotics * DFI with presumptive evidence or suspicion of osteomyelitis * Necrotizing fasciitis, crepitant cellulitis, wet gangrene, gas gangrene, ecthyma gangrenosum, septic arthritis, or severely impaired arterial supply to any portion of the affected foot which may need revascularization before the end of the study * Evidence of significant hepatic, renal, hematologic, or immunologic disease * Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Prior receipt of any formulation of contezolid acefosamil or contezolid * Inability to cooperate fully with the requirements of the study protocol, including the schedule of events, or likely to be noncompliant with any study requirements, or the Investigator determines that the subject should not participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical response calculated with percentage of subjects with resolution of DFI signs and symptoms and requiring no further therapy as assessed by InvestigatorsDay 35The primary objective is to evaluate the Investigator's assessment of clinical response at the D35 visit in subjects receiving contezolid acefosamil/contezolid compared to subjects receiving linezolid in the MITT analysis
Adverse events - symptoms reported by subjects28-35 days after End-of-Therapy (EOT)Evaluate safety of contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) compared with linezolid (IV and PO)
Clinical laboratory assessment - complete blood count28-35 days after End-of-Therapy (EOT)Will be evaluated under safety of contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) compared with linezolid (IV and PO)
Vital signs - heart rate28-35 days after End-of-Therapy (EOT)Will be evaluated under safety of contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) compared with linezolid (IV and PO)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical response calculated with percentage of subjects with resolution of DFI signs and symptoms and requiring no further therapy as assessed by Investigators14-28 daysEvaluate the Investigator's assessment of clinical response at EOT visit in the MITT analysis set

Countries

Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Italy, Latvia, Poland, Serbia, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactClinical coordinator
info@micurx.com510-782-2022

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026