Skip to content

Study and Follow-up of the Clinical Effectiveness and Comparative Safety of Biosimilar Teriparatide in the Management of Postmenopausal or Senile.

Study and Follow-up of the Clinical Effectiveness and Comparative Safety of Biosimilar Teriparatide in the Management of Postmenopausal or Senile (ESECTO)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05369013
Acronym
ESECTO
Enrollment
188
Registered
2022-05-11
Start date
2021-06-15
Completion date
2024-04-14
Last updated
2022-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, Risk fracture, Postmenopausical, Forsteo, Movymia

Brief summary

Non-interventional observational prospective follow-up study of cohorts of patients with Previous diagnosis of Osteoporosis with high risk of fractures, with/without previous fractures and treatment with bone formers (biosimilar or original Teriparatide), who meet all the inclusion criteria and exclusion, with prior information and signing of prior informed consent documents.

Detailed description

Non-interventional observational prospective follow-up study of cohorts of patients with Previous diagnosis of Osteoporosis with high risk of fractures, with/without previous fractures and treatment with bone formers (biosimilar or original Teriparatide), who meet all the inclusion criteria and exclusion, with prior information and signing of prior informed consent documents. Primary objective: Verify the clinical effectiveness of Teriparatide Biosimilar under clinical practice conditions real. Compare this clinical effectiveness with original Teriparatide administered under similar conditions of actual clinical practice. Design: Observational cohort study, prospective, multicenter, nationwide. Study population: Patients with a previous diagnosis of Osteoporosis with a high risk of fractures,with/without previous fractures and in treatment with bone formers since before the start of the study. The patients will be distributed into 2 cohorts based on whether they are receiving similar Teriparatide (cohort A) or original Teriparatide (Cohort B).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Palacios
CollaboratorOTHER
Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
CollaboratorOTHER
Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital d´Igualada
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Alpha Bioresearch S.L.
CollaboratorOTHER
STADA, Spain
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signing the Informed Consent Men or women of legal age who have completed somatic growth. * Previous diagnosis of densitometric osteoporosis in any location (densitometry with DEXA diagnosis within 6 months prior to start of treatment) or previous diagnosis of established osteoporosis (due to previous low-impact fracture, central or peripheral) * Being in previous treatment with similar Teriparatide (cohort A) or with original Teriparatide (Cohort B). * Be in possession of mental faculties to understand the therapeutic proposal, understand and follow the follow-up protocol and be able to sign the consent document informed.

Exclusion criteria

* The informed consent signature was not obtained. * Patients who meet any of the contraindications for the use of teriparatide.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness for patients treatment with original24 MonthsAt the different moments of analysis (6, 12 and 24 months of treatment) in each of the treatment groups will be presented. The 95% confidence interval will be calculated for the mean percent change difference between groups. Likewise, the Student's t-test will be calculated for independent samples to assess statistical significance. To determine the fracture rate of any location during the study, the percentage of patients in each of the groups will be calculated descriptively. This proportion of patients will be compared between groups using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, when applicable. The baseline-final change in biochemical markers of bone remodeling (BRM) between treatment groups will also be evaluated through the Student's t-test for independent samples if they meet the normality parameters or, failing that, its corresponding non-parametric test. (Mann-Whitney U test). .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demographic and personal aspects related to the risk of osteoporosis24 Monthsage, sex, province of residence, year of diagnosis of OP.
Risk factor of osteoporosis30 MonthsAs per previous patient´s medical records. Phisician will evaluated risk factor as per clinical practice. This information will be available at Clinical Records for each patients.
Previous clinical data24 MonthsFamily history of interest as per clinical practice. This information will be available at Clinical Records for each patients.
Anthropometric clinical data24 Monthsweight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
Osteoporosis diagnosis24 MonthsBy BMD; BMD data in CL and hip, measured value in g/cm2 and T-Score value.
TBS24 MonthsTBS value
FRAX24 MonthsFRAX value of hip and major fracture.
Confirm fracture rate in any localization while study is ongoing30 MonthsIn order to determinate fracture rate from any localization, patient´s percentage from each group will be calculated in a descriptive way using: Bone fractures during treatment Falls.
Hepatic profile24 MonthsCombined information described by: SGPT (U/L), SGOT (U/L), Gamma GT (U/L), FA (U/L), BT (mg/dl). This information will be collected in 194 patients who were recruited in this study. This information will be collected as per protocol during 30months. Physicians will evaluated this parameters as per clinical practice.
Previous bone fractures30 MonthsNumber and type of previous fractures.
Previous treatment for osteoporosis24 MonthsPrevious treatment of osteoporosis indicated as yes or no. This information will be available at Clinical Records for each patients.This information will be collected in 194 patients who were recruited in this study. This information will be collected as per protocol during 30months. Physicians will evaluated this parameters as per clinical practice.
Complementary previous treatment for osteoporosis24 MonthsPrevious complementary treatment with Vitamin D and/or Calcium.
Security profile30 MonthsNumber of secondary effects. Each secondary effects will be evaluted according to medical criterion.This information will be collected in 194 patients who were recruited in this study. This information will be collected as per protocol during 30months. Physicians will evaluated this parameters as per clinical practice. Day of start/end will be indicated.
Bone fractures during treatment24 MonthsNumber of fractures during treatment.
Falls24 MonthsNumber of falls during the treatment.
Bone remodelling biomarkers24 MonthsCombined information described by: BGP (ng/ml), CTX (ng/ml), NTX (nmol/nmol creatine), P1NP (ng/ml), 25 OH vitamin D (ng/ml), intact PTH (pg/ml), TSH uUl/ml), Testosterone (ng/ml), Estradiol (pg/ml), Calcium (mg/dl), Phosphorus (mg/dl).This information will be collected in 194 patients who were recruited in this study. This information will be collected as per protocol during 30months. Physicians will evaluated this parameters as per clinical practice.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026