Skip to content

Comparison of Removing and Non-removing Patellofemoral Joint Osteophytes Following Medial Unicompartment Knee Arthroplasty

Does Removing Patellofemoral Joint Osteophytes Reduce Anterior Knee Pain Following Unicompartment Knee Arthroplasty?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05367375
Enrollment
90
Registered
2022-05-10
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2021-11-01
Last updated
2022-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Knee Pain

Keywords

patellofemoral osteophyte, anteromedial osteoarthritis knee, mobile bearing UKA, patellofemoral pain

Brief summary

Background: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is a challenge following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Some surgeons remove patellofemoral joint (PFJ) osteophytes to reduce osteophyte impingement and AKP. However, there is evidence that PFJ osteophytes compensate for knee osteoarthritis (OA) by increasing and improving stability and increase contract surface area in knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, when PFJ osteophytes are not removed, some studies report good clinical outcomes. The issue of removing or leaving PFJ osteophytes is controversial. The objective of this study was to compare AKP following mobile bearing UKA after removing or leaving PFJ osteophytes. Methods: The prospective non-randomized study included 89 isolated medial osteoarthritis (OA) of knee. They were classified into 2 groups. Group (Gp)1 was removing PFJ osteophytes; consists of 44 knees. Gp2 was non-removing PFJ osteophytes: consists of 45 knees. The patients were follow up and recorded incidence of AKP and VAS for AKP at 6 weeks, 3months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years. No patients were lost to follow up. The patellar tilt and shift were measured at 6 weeks, 3months, 6months, 1year and 2 years via skyline view radiography. The knee society scores, Oxford knee score, knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, forgotten joint score and Kujala scale also were recorede at 6 weeks, 3months, 6months, 1 year and 2 years.

Detailed description

Removing and non-removing osteophyte at patellofemoral joint is controversial topic. The osteophyte may help to reduce load and improve stability of patellofemoral joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compared anterior knee pain between removing and non-removing osteophyte at patellofemoral joint following medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Interventions

PROCEDUREremoving osteophyte at patellofemoral joint

to compare anterior knee pain between removing patellofemoral joint osteophytes and non-removing patellofemoral joint osteophytes after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Sponsors

Thammasat University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
43 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 42 years old * range of motion \> 90 degrees * flexion contracture\< 15 degrees * normal function of anterior cruciate ligament

Exclusion criteria

* spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee * inflammatory joinr arthritis * full thickness cartilage loss at lateral compartment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of anterior knee pain6 weeksnumber of participant that had anterior knee pain
Visual analogue scale for anterior knee pain6 weekspain score 0= no pain and pain score 10= maximum pain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026