Skip to content

Patient-Reported Erectile Recovery and Quality of Life Outcomes With Lyopreserved Placental Tissue Applied Directly Over Neurovascular Bundle During Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Standard of Care

Patient-Reported Erectile Recovery and Quality of Life Outcomes With Lyopreserved Placental Tissue Applied Directly Over Neurovascular Bundle During Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Standard of Care

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05366842
Enrollment
3
Registered
2022-05-09
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
2025-04-25
Last updated
2026-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

erectile dysfunction, radical prostatectomy

Brief summary

Surgical implantation of Lyopreserved Placental Tissue (LPT) is FDA approved and has been used extensively in wound care. The use is expanding and more recently, LPT has been used in the management of diabetic foot ulcers, acute and chronic surgical wounds, various fistulas and even as a nerve wrap on the common peroneal nerve. Surgical technique for nerve-sparing prostatectomy has evolved continuously since first described by Walsh in 1982 and is now commonly performed with robotic assistance. The investigators intend to study whether placement of LPT over the spared neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic prostatectomy will improve return to potency and/or continence after robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patients with a preoperative Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score \> 19 (moderate or high pre-op sexual function) planning to undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy will be randomized to receive direct placement of LPT over the preserved neurovascular bundles vs standard of care. Patients will independently report erectile function and continence at 1 months, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Primary outcomes would include mean time to achieve potency, percentage of group achieving potency at each time point, and mean change in SHIM score. Secondary outcomes would include mean time to achieve continence. The investigators will also report any adverse events.

Interventions

DRUGStravix lyopreserved placental tissue (LPT)

Participants will undergo surgical implantation of Stravix lyopreserved placental tissue (LPT) during a standard of care radical prostatectomy.

PROCEDURERadical prostatectomy

Standard care (no placement of tissue)

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

This is a single center, randomized; singe blinded, two-arm trial comparing the effects of direct placement of lyopreservation placental tissue over the spared neurovascular bundles vs. standard care (no placement of tissue) on erectile recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. The sample size will be 30 patients randomized to each study arm (60 patients total).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male sex 40 to 65 years of age with localized prostate cancer (clinical stage less than or equal to T2a, Gleason grade less than or equal to 3+4=7 (Gleason 8 or 4+3=7 will be excluded), Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) less than or equal to 10 ng/mL) 2. Scheduled to undergo curative radical prostatectomy applying bilateral nerve-sparing procedure 3. Intact pre-surgical erectile function (International Index of Erectile Function \[IIEF\]-5 / Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score greater than or equal to 18) 4. Willingness to attempt intercourse at least 5 times per month following surgery. 5. Has a sexual partner of at least 6 months with current sexual activity (within the past 4 weeks)

Exclusion criteria

1. Known penile deformity or a history of Peyronie's disease 2. Pre or postoperative androgen therapy 3. Pre or postoperative radiation therapy 4. History of high or low blood pressure that is not controlled 5. Taking nitrates medications 6. History of heart problems such as angina, heart failure, irregular heartbeats, or myocardial infarction 7. History of drug or alcohol abuse 8. Current smoker has a 20 pack/year history of cigarette smoking 9. History of acute or chronic depression 10. History of liver problems or kidney problems 11. History of retinitis pigmentosa or severe vision loss, including a condition called NAION 12. History of spinal trauma or surgery to the brain or spinal cord 13. Other contraindications to the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE) 5 inhibitors 14. History of known sensitivities to any of the following reagents used for processing, disinfection, and storage, which may remain on the product: * Lyopreservation Solution: 18.9% w/v Trehalose in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline * Disinfection Solution: 0.5% v/v Gentamicin Sulfate, 0.1% v/v Vancomycin reconstituted in Water for Injection (WFI), 1% v/v Amphotericin B, 98.4% Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) * Processing Solution: DMEM, Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (dPBS), 11% Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution in Saline, Formula A (ACD-A), 1.7% w/v Trehalose in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Erectile Function as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Score1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months post-surgeryThe primary outcome variable is the patient's score on the IIEF questionnaire (erectile function domain) at 1,3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. A comparison of changes in the initial IIEF score will be evaluated to determine treatment efficacy. The IIEF contains 15 questions. A score of 0-5 is awarded to each of the 15 questions that examine the 4 main domains of male sexual function: erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, and intercourse satisfaction. Overall scores will be categorized as follows: * 1-10: Severe Erectile Dysfunction * 11-16: Moderate dysfunction. * 17-21: Mild to moderate dysfunction * 22-25: Mild dysfunction * 26-30: No dysfunction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Erectile Function and Overall Quality of Life as Assessed by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Score From Questionnaires1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months post-surgeryThe following questionnaires will be combined into a composite index EPIC score. EPIC scoring involves linear standardization of the response for each questionnaire to a 0 to 100 scale. Using the item groupings for each health-related quality of life (HRQOL) Domain Summary Score or Subscale score, values are averaged for all items within a group to create the summary or subscale score. A higher score represents better HRQOL. EPIC scores will be compared at each time point. A clinically relevant increase for the sexual domain is 10-12 points. * The Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) assesses erection in terms of hardness, onset, duration, and changes in erection quality. There are 6 questions. * The Short Form Survey (SF-12) assesses 8 health domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, etc with 1-2 questions per domain. * The MUSIC questionnaire assesses four domains: urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal. Each domain consists of 2-4 questions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArthur Burnett, MD

Johns Hopkins University

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026