Skip to content

Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Effect of Intrapulmonary Percussion Ventilation on Deposition of Inhaled Aerosols in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05366387
Acronym
AEROPERC
Enrollment
9
Registered
2022-05-09
Start date
2022-11-23
Completion date
2025-02-12
Last updated
2025-12-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Keywords

aerosol, deposition, Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation

Brief summary

This protocol aims to evaluate the feasibility and benefit of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) to improve deposition of inhaled radiolabelled aerosols in fibrotic lung regions of patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF). Phase 1 of the protocol aims to identify the highest IPV pressure that is tolerated by individual patients. Secondary endpoints explore safety of IPV in IPF patients. Phase 2 of the protocol is a crossover randomized trial where patients will inhale 99mTc-labelled DiethyleneTriamine PentaAcetate (DTPA) aerosols with or without IPV. Aerosol deposition in HRCT-defined fibrotic regions of interest (ROI) is described by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT).

Interventions

Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation is a non invasive ventilation technique where small boli or air are delivered, at adjustable frequency and pressure, to the upper airways though a mouthpiece. IPV is currently used in the clinic to aid with airway clearance in neuromuscular and airway diseases.

RADIATIONdelivery of 99mTc-DTPA aerosol

A 99mTc-DTPA aerosol (500 MBq+/-20%, 3 ml volume) is generated with a jet nebuliser (MMAD 4 µm). The aerosol is inhaled by the study subject and lung deposition is imaged by SPECT

Sponsors

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital, Tours
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Phase 1 : Open label Phase 2 : The primary endpoint is defined by quantitative analysis of SPECT images. Analysis is done by a project Partner (Inserm UMR1101), blinded to treatment arm.

Intervention model description

Phase 1 : Delivery of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) to assess for discomfort and adverse effects Phase 2 : Delivery of radiolabelled aerosols with or without IPV, in a crossover design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of IPF according to 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines * Affiliation to health insurance * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Other chronic lung disease * Airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC\<0.7) * History of congestive heart failure * History of IPF exacerbation * History of lung cancer * Chronic cough precluding aerosol delivery and radioprotection * Claustrophobia * 24h/24 oxygen therapy * Any acute lung disease * Any potentially transmissible lung infection * Current or possible pregnancy and breastfeeding * Contra-indications to IPV : Emphysema, recent barotrauma, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum * History of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum * Patient unable to hold a mouthpiece tightly * Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship) * Contraindication to the administration of Technescan DTPA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Change between Control and IPV condition in amount of 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol deposited in fibrotic lung regions, reported to loaded doseAfter delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 4/5) i.e. up to 1 monthFollowing aerosol delivery, chest imaging is done with a SPECT device. SPECT images are fused to high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) images. Fibrotic lung regions regions of interest (ROI) are defined by analysis of HRCT images. SPECT signal in fibrotic ROI is reported to the radioactive dose that was loaded in the nebulizer Endpoint is radioactive signal in fibrotic ROI / loaded dose
Phase 1: Discomfort during IPVimmediately after IPV (visit V1)IPV is delivered at increasing pressure (from 5 cm H2O to 40 cm H2O maximum pressure) and discomfort is assessed by a 5-level Likert scale ranging from no discomfort to untolerable discomfort. IPV is stopped when discomfort is rated as difficult to tolerate whatever the pressure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Forced Vital CapacityBefore IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)Spirometry Forced vital capacity is expressed in liters
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in Carbon monoxide transfer factor (DLCO)Before IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)Single breath test DLCO is expressed in mL/min/mmHg
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in 5 Hz respiratory reactanceBefore IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)Impulse oscillometry 5 Hz reactance is expressed as kPa.s/L
Phase 1: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Eventsimmediately after IPV (Visit 1) until 15 days after IPV (V2)Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in dyspneaBefore IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)Dyspnea-12 scale
Phase 2 : Change between Control and IPV condition in total lung deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosolAfter delivery of radiolabelled aerosol under both Control and IPV condition (Visit 5)Ratio of SPECT in total lung / loaded dose
Phase 2: Ratio of deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosol in fibrotic lung versus normal lungAfter aerosol delivery in the Control conditionROI for normally-appearing lung are defined by HRCT. Endpoint is SPECT signal in fibrotic lung ROI / SPECT signal in normally-appearing lung ROI
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events one month after treatment1-month after the last aerosol delivery (V6)Telephone interview to assess for : Symptomatic pneumothorax Acute exacerbation of IPF requiring hospitalization
Phase 1: Sensations associated with IPV in patients with IPFimmediately after IPV (Visit 1)5-levels Likert scales ranging from not at all to Very much are used to answer the following questions : I have trouble breathing This thumps to much This is scary
Phase 1: IPV-induced variations in coughBefore IPV (Visit 1) and 15 days after IPV (Visit 2)Leicester Cough Questionnaire

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exploratory endpoint : Impact of specific lung lesions on pulmonary ventilation and deposition of the 99mTc-labelled DTPA aerosolAfter aerosol delivery under the Control condition (Visit 4 or 5 according to randomization) i.e. up to 1 monthAdditional ROI are defined on HRCT to define predominant lung lesions as either ground glass opacities, reticulations, or bronchiectasis. The impact of these lesions on pulmonary ventilation and aerosol deposition is described as : * pulmonary ventilation : Fusion of HRCT images with 88mKr-ventilation SPECT images. * aerosol deposition : Fusion of HRCT images with 99mTc-DTPA aerosol deposition images.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026