Knee Prosthetic Surgery, Robotic Assistance
Conditions
Keywords
Knee prosthetic surgery robotic assistance
Brief summary
Comparing clinical and radiological results of patients after prosthetic surgery conventionally with no robotic assistance and ROSA® Knee prosthetic surgery robotic assistance.
Interventions
Robotic Assisted Knee Prosthetic Surgery using ROSA® (Zimmer-Biomet) System
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Knee osteoarthritis requiring PS Knee Prosthesis
Exclusion criteria
* Not meeting Inclusion Criteria * Requiring Constrained Prosthesis * Metal Allergy * Neurological disorders. * Cognitive impairment * Not giving consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Utility of ROSA® (Zimmer-Biomet) Robotic assisting system for knee prosthetic surgery | 6 months after surgery | Correct lower limb mechanical alignment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Implant Stability | 1 year after surgery | Presence of varus / valgus instability |
| Mobility | 1 year after surgery | Range of Motion in degrees |
| Technique reproducibility between surgeons | Intraoperative | Reproducing mechanical alignment in degrees |
| Patient satisfaction | 1 year after surgery | Patient satisfaction in a numeric scale from 1 to 10 |
| Complications | 1 year after surgery | Major /Minor Complications |
| Time to home discharge | 1 month | Hospital stay in days between surgery and discharging home |
| Pain Control | 1 year after surgery | Pain measurement with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) |
| Technique Timing at Operating Room (OR) | Intraoperative | Timing in minutes to measure reproducibility between surgeons |
| Time to Recovery | 1 year after surgery | Time to feel patients themselves better than presurgery in months |
Countries
Spain