Skip to content

Comparison of ACL Reconstruction With Stump Preservation and Stump Resection

Does Stump-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Provide Better Functional Outcomes?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05364398
Enrollment
120
Registered
2022-05-06
Start date
2017-04-01
Completion date
2020-09-01
Last updated
2025-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Ligament Injury

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, tibial stump, stump preservation, knee proprioception.

Brief summary

To assess the clinical outcome in patients who had ACL reconstruction with preservation of the remnant and compare it with patients in whom the stump was resected

Detailed description

100 patients are subjected to ACL reconstruction. Half of them had ACL reconstruction with Stump preservation and the other half had ACL reconstruction with stump resection. The clinical outcome in both groups is assessed and compared

Interventions

PROCEDUREACL reconstruction

Use of hamstring tendons graft to replace the torn ACL and being passed and fixed through the femoral and tibial sides

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with torn ACL within 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Old ACL injury Multi-ligamentous knee injuries Mal-alignments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee stability2 yearsKT-1000 Arthrometer
Knee proprioception2 yearsPassive angle reproduction test
Lysholm score2 years
Tegner activity score2 years
IKDC score2 years

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026