Laparoscopy, Leakage of Cardiac Device, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Conditions
Keywords
Laparoscopy, PMCF, Laparoscopic surgery, Vessel ligation, Duct ligation, Vessel leakage, Duct leakage
Brief summary
This is a Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) investigation to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of the Multi-Fire Clip System in laparoscopic surgery. This system consists of two medical devices, the M/L-10 Clip Applier and the M/L-10 Clip. The Multi-Fire Clip System is indicated for occluding and ligating vessels, ducts, tracts and other tubular structures during laparoscopic and general surgical procedures. This medical device has been marketed in Europe since 2006 and in the United States since 2002, among other places. Laparoscopic surgeries have become the standard of excellence for many surgical procedures as they allow the intervention to be performed in a minimally invasive way, which means significant improvements in factors such as postoperative pain or length of hospital stay compared to open surgeries. Laparoscopic procedures require the use of different hemostatic techniques to minimize blood loss or leakage of other fluids through their respective ducts. Currently, clip and staple placement are the most commonly used procedures for ligation and/or occlusion of blood vessels and other tubular structures. In this context, the Multi-Fire Clip System is presented as an alternative device that can produce significant cost savings due to the reusable design of the M/L-10 Clip Applier. It also provides precise control of bleeding during surgery, which could lead to less potential injury to surrounding structures. The present clinical trial is a PMCF study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Multi-Fire Clip System in patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery in which clip placement is anticipated. During the surgery procedure, the necessary clips will be placed using the aforementioned multi-shot clip system. Participants will be followed up for 6 months after the operation. Through an on-site visit and a telephone call visit, data on possible adverse events related to the device or procedure will be collected in order to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of these devices.
Detailed description
The RELAP PMCF will be conducted as a prospective, single-arm, open-label and multi-center clinical investigation and will include up to 230 subjects derived for laparoscopic surgery. The clinical investigation will be conducted in up to 12 sites located in European countries. Additional sites or other countries may be approached for participation in the clinical investigation if needed. The primary objective of the RELAP Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study is to determine the long-term effectiveness of the Multi-Fire Clip System through 6-months follow-up. The secondary objective of the RELAP Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study is focused on the long-term evaluation of Multi-Fire Clip System safety and effectiveness through the collection of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs) related to both the medical device and the procedure. The primary safety and efficacy endpoint is the efficacy of long-term vessel/duct ligation defined as absence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to vessel and/or duct leakage due to incomplete ligation of the vessel/duct after appropriate placement of clip at 6 months in patients indicated for laparoscopic surgical procedure. There are several secondary endpoints planned for his clinical investigation. Firstly, all serious adverse events (SAEs) will be evaluated at 6 months. Additionally, a long-term evaluation of major adverse events (MAEs) related to both the medical device and the procedure. A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint. The time frame for the long-term evaluation will be 30-days follow-up and 6-months follow-up. Moreover, the Acute Procedural Success (APS), defined as the absence of (S)AEs within 24h after the surgery, will be assessed. The Acute Device Success, defined as the absence of (S)AEs related to the devices within the 24h after the surgery will also be evaluated. Finally, the Length of Stay (LoS) in the hospital will be evaluated. The Clinical Investigation visits will occur at Baseline, Procedure and 30-days follow-up, with a final phone call at 6 months will take place. This clinical investigation will enroll male and female adult subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic surgery using a clip. Subjects must meet all eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent prior to conducting any investigation-specific procedures not considered standard of care. The target population are subjects that require a laparoscopic surgery and a clip can be used to occlude a vessel/duct. Approximately 230 subjects will be enrolled in the clinical investigation in order to assess the primary endpoint. The expected duration of enrollment is up to 12 months. The expected duration of each subject's participation is 6 months, including the scheduled visits and data collection for this clinical investigation that will occur during the "early follow-up visit" at 30 days after the procedure and 6 months. The subject follow-up will be considered completed at the conclusion of their 6-month follow-up visit. Therefore, the total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 18 months. Regarding the statistical analysis, the primary safety and effectiveness endpoint results will be compared with the data reported in the literature for similar medical devices. The analysis population will be the per-protocol (PP) population, and the results will be presented as the incidence (in percentage) of AEs related to leakage, with a 95% confidence. Further analyses using the PP population will be performed in order to verify the statistical robustness of the results. Secondary endpoints of this clinical investigation will refer to the assessment of the safety of laparoscopic surgical procedures through the collections of all SAEs reported at 6 months. In all cases, the PP population will be the analysis population, and results will be presented as a percentage, defining a Risk Ratio (RR), with 95% confidence. Other secondary endpoints of this clinical investigation include the acute device success and acute procedural success, which will be assessed during procedure. Besides, the length of hospital stay will also be analyzed, and data will be presented as total number of days. The sample size calculation is based on the purpose to demonstrate non-inferiority of Multi-Fire Clip System compared to other metallic clips in terms of AEs related to fluid leakage. This assessment will allow to define a success rate of the long-term effectiveness and safety of M/L-10 Multi-Fire Clip System. Primary data collection based on source-documented hospital and/or clinic chart reviews will be performed clearly and accurately by site personnel trained on the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP) and Case Report Form (CRF) completion. The investigator will ensure accuracy, completeness, legibility and timeliness of the data reported to the Sponsor on the CRFs and in all required reports. Data on CRFs will be collected for all subjects that are enrolled into the clinical investigation. A Data Management Plan (DMP) will describe procedures used for data entry and collection. Data review and data cleaning, and issuing, resolving data discrepancies and methods for data base lock. The DMP will include procedures for the verification, validation and securing of electronic clinical system. The investigator/site will permit direct access to source data/documents for the purpose of performing clinical investigation-related monitoring, audits, EC review and regulatory inspections. Regulations and GCP require the Investigator to maintain information in the subject's original medical records that corroborates data collected on the CRFs. In order to comply with these regulatory requirements/GCP, medical history data, adverse events reported and their resolution as well as any other data required to substantiate data entered into the CRF, will be recorded. Data on CRFs will be collected for all subjects that are enrolled into the clinical investigation. Sponsor and/or designee will monitor the clinical investigation over its duration according to the CIP-specific monitoring plan which will include the planned extent of source data verification. This monitoring plan will be a separate document that can be updated during the course of the study. As for the safety monitoring, Measures taken to avoid bias related to safety includes 100% of source data verification related to AEs documented in the Monitoring Plan. A Sponsor representative or designee may request access to all clinical investigation records, including source documentation, for inspection during a Quality Assurance audit. This clinical investigation, sponsored by Microline Surgical Inc. (Beverly, USA), will be conducted in accordance with this CIP. All investigators involved in the conduct of the clinical investigation will be qualified by education, training, or experience to perform their tasks and this training will be documented appropriately.
Interventions
Permanent ligation of vessels and ducts as part of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Patient selection based on need for laparoscopic surgical treatment involving vessel or duct ligation.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Adult subjects, male or female, ≥18 years old 2. Subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic surgery using the clip 3. Subjects who had provided written informed consent form 4. Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements to be evaluated for each study visit
Exclusion criteria
1. Subjects referred for laparoscopic surgeries to reinforce a staple line or produce partial vessel occlusion 2. Significant surgical contraindications evaluated using the GOALS score 3. Subjects unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery according to PI discretion 4. Subjects who have coagulopathy or uninterruptible anticoagulation therapy 5. Subjects currently under steroid treatment 6. Subject has known allergy to device components (i.e., titanium, stainless steel) 7. Subjects who are participating in another trial which may affect the outcomes data on this study 8. Inability to adhere to study-related procedures 9. Subjects that require emergency surgeries associated with trauma and/or sepsis with a SOFA score ≥ 2 and/or septic shock should be excluded 10. Pregnant or lactating women at the time of the surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| No Post-Operative Leakage of Ligation Sites | 6 months after laparoscopic surgical procedures | Efficacy of long-term vessel/duct ligation defined as absence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to vessel and/or duct leakage due to incomplete ligation of the vessel/duct after appropriate placement of clip at 6 months of laparoscopic surgical procedures. Assessment of leakage was based on follow-up inquiry six months after the ligation procedure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term Evaluation of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) Related to the Medical Device or Procedure With 30-days Follow-up | 30-days follow-up | MAEs are adverse events that can occur due to the operative procedure include, but are not limited to: * Major bleeding requiring reoperation * Septic shock from intraabdominal infection * Bowel injury requiring repair * Vascular injuries requiring repair * Genitourinary injuries requiring repair * Biliary injuries requiring repair * Retained foreign body, which is a patient safety incident in which a surgical object is accidentally left in a body cavity or operation wound following a procedure. MAES can also occur due to Anesthesia include, but are not limited to: * Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke) * Myocardial Infarction * Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Blood clots A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint. |
| All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) With 30 Days Follow-up | 30 days follow-up follow-up after laparoscopic surgical procedures | SAEs are Adverse Events (AEs) that meet any of the criteria below: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 5. chronic disease |
| Long-term Evaluation of Major Adverse Events (MAES) Related to the Medical Device or Procedure With 6-month Follow-up | 6-months follow-up | MAEs are adverse events that can occur due to the operative procedure include, but are not limited to: * Major bleeding requiring reoperation * Septic shock from intraabdominal infection * Bowel injury requiring repair * Vascular injuries requiring repair * Genitourinary injuries requiring repair * Biliary injuries requiring repair * Retained foreign body, which is a patient safety incident in which a surgical object is accidentally left in a body cavity or operation wound following a procedure. MAES can also occur due to Anesthesia include, but are not limited to: * Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke) * Myocardial Infarction * Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Blood clots A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint. |
| Acute Procedural Success (APS) | One day (during procedure) | The Acute Procedural Success (APS) is defined as the absence of (S)AEs related to the procedure during the first 24 hours. |
| Acute Device Success (ADS) | One day (during procedure) | Acute Device Success (ADS) is defined as absence of (S)AEs related to the device during the first 24h after procedure. |
| Length of Stay (LoS) in Hospital | Up to 30 days | Patient's length of Stay (LoS) in hospital from day of admission to hospital discharge after laparoscopic surgical procedure. |
| All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) With 6 Months Follow-up | 6 month follow-up after laparoscopic surgical procedures | SAEs are Adverse Events (AEs) that meet any of the criteria below: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 5. chronic disease |
Countries
Portugal, Spain
Contacts
Hospital QuirónSalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The RELAP clinical investigation enrolled subjects across six clinical sites in Spain and one in Portugal. First subject enrolled: 17-Oct-2022 in Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña Last subject enrolled: 16-Feb-2024 in Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. This study had an enrollment period of 487 days considering the range from FPI to Last Patient In LPI dates.
Pre-assignment details
Of 245 enrolled subjects, one was implanted despite later being found to meet an exclusion criterion and remained in the Safety and ITT sets. Fourteen (14) others were not included in the study population due to withdrawal, conversion to open surgery, unfavorable anatomy, device issues, or lack of sterilized equipment, resulting in no device use.
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | — |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.96 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.83 |
| Asthma No | 220 Participants |
| Asthma Yes | 11 Participants |
| Cardiovascular history No | 108 Participants |
| Cardiovascular history Yes | 123 Participants |
| Childbearing potential No | 222 Participants |
| Childbearing potential Yes | 9 Participants |
| Chronic liver disease No | 225 Participants |
| Chronic liver disease Yes | 6 Participants |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) No | 203 Participants |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Yes | 28 Participants |
| Coagulopathy No | 229 Participants |
| Coagulopathy Yes | 2 Participants |
| Connective tissue disorder No | 218 Participants |
| Connective tissue disorder Yes | 13 Participants |
| Coronary artery disease No | 221 Participants |
| Coronary artery disease Yes | 10 Participants |
| Diabetes No | 171 Participants |
| Diabetes Yes | 60 Participants |
| Gastric cancer No | 130 Participants |
| Gastric cancer Yes | 23 Participants |
| Gastric cancer Yes, specifically gastrointestinal malignancies | 78 Participants |
| Gastrointestinal disease No | 200 Participants |
| Gastrointestinal disease Yes | 31 Participants |
| Height [cm] | 163.20 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.72 |
| Hematologic disease No | 202 Participants |
| Hematologic disease Yes | 29 Participants |
| History of allergy/hypersensitivity No | 195 Participants |
| History of allergy/hypersensitivity Yes | 36 Participants |
| Hyperlipidaemia No | 149 Participants |
| Hyperlipidaemia Yes | 82 Participants |
| Hypertension No | 124 Participants |
| Hypertension Yes | 107 Participants |
| Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) No | 213 Participants |
| Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Yes | 18 Participants |
| Ischemic heart disease No | 222 Participants |
| Ischemic heart disease Yes | 9 Participants |
| Lung fibrosis No | 230 Participants |
| Lung fibrosis Yes | 1 Participants |
| Other cardiovascular disease No | 203 Participants |
| Other cardiovascular disease Yes | 28 Participants |
| Other gastrointestinal diseases No | 227 Participants |
| Other gastrointestinal diseases Yes | 4 Participants |
| Other pulmonary disorder No | 215 Participants |
| Other pulmonary disorder Yes | 16 Participants |
| Peripheral vascular disease No | 227 Participants |
| Peripheral vascular disease Yes | 4 Participants |
| Physical examination - Cardiovascular system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Cardiovascular system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 183 Participants |
| Physical examination - Cardiovascular system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 47 Participants |
| Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 227 Participants |
| Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat Number of subjects with significant alterations | 3 Participants |
| Physical examination - Endocrine system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Endocrine system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 202 Participants |
| Physical examination - Endocrine system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 28 Participants |
| Physical examination - Eyes Number of subjects with missing Data | 2 Participants |
| Physical examination - Eyes Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 219 Participants |
| Physical examination - Eyes Number of subjects with significant alterations | 10 Participants |
| Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 158 Participants |
| Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen Number of subjects with significant alterations | 72 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 192 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract Number of subjects with significant alterations | 38 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lymphatic system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lymphatic system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 206 Participants |
| Physical examination - Lymphatic system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 24 Participants |
| Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 211 Participants |
| Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 19 Participants |
| Physical examination - Nervous system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Nervous system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 219 Participants |
| Physical examination - Nervous system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 11 Participants |
| Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 183 Participants |
| Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 47 Participants |
| Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue Number of Subjects with normal system functioning | 224 Participants |
| Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue Number of subjects with significant alterations | 6 Participants |
| Physical examination - Urogenital system Number of Subjects with missing Data | 1 Participants |
| Physical examination - Urogenital system Number of subjects with normal system functioning | 202 Participants |
| Physical examination - Urogenital system Number of subjects with significant alterations | 28 Participants |
| Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery Data Not Obtained | 1 Participants |
| Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery No | 201 Participants |
| Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery Yes | 29 Participants |
| Pulmonary disease No | 182 Participants |
| Pulmonary disease Yes | 49 Participants |
| Regular alcohol consumption No | 214 Participants |
| Regular alcohol consumption not reported patient data | 7 Participants |
| Regular alcohol consumption Yes | 10 Participants |
| Regular smoker No | 203 Participants |
| Regular smoker Number of Subjects with missing Data | 6 Participants |
| Regular smoker Yes | 22 Participants |
| Renal disease No | 218 Participants |
| Renal disease Yes | 13 Participants |
| Respiratory failure No | 231 Participants |
| Respiratory failure Yes | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 114 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 117 Participants |
| Stroke No | 227 Participants |
| Stroke Yes | 4 Participants |
| Weight [kg] | 84.97 Kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.96 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 7 / 231 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 47 / 231 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 73 / 231 |