Skip to content

Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of Reusable Clip Applier Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery

Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of REusable Clip Applier and Cartridge Devices for LAParoscopic Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05363813
Acronym
RELAP
Enrollment
245
Registered
2022-05-06
Start date
2022-10-17
Completion date
2024-08-19
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopy, Leakage of Cardiac Device, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Laparoscopy, PMCF, Laparoscopic surgery, Vessel ligation, Duct ligation, Vessel leakage, Duct leakage

Brief summary

This is a Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) investigation to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of the Multi-Fire Clip System in laparoscopic surgery. This system consists of two medical devices, the M/L-10 Clip Applier and the M/L-10 Clip. The Multi-Fire Clip System is indicated for occluding and ligating vessels, ducts, tracts and other tubular structures during laparoscopic and general surgical procedures. This medical device has been marketed in Europe since 2006 and in the United States since 2002, among other places. Laparoscopic surgeries have become the standard of excellence for many surgical procedures as they allow the intervention to be performed in a minimally invasive way, which means significant improvements in factors such as postoperative pain or length of hospital stay compared to open surgeries. Laparoscopic procedures require the use of different hemostatic techniques to minimize blood loss or leakage of other fluids through their respective ducts. Currently, clip and staple placement are the most commonly used procedures for ligation and/or occlusion of blood vessels and other tubular structures. In this context, the Multi-Fire Clip System is presented as an alternative device that can produce significant cost savings due to the reusable design of the M/L-10 Clip Applier. It also provides precise control of bleeding during surgery, which could lead to less potential injury to surrounding structures. The present clinical trial is a PMCF study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the Multi-Fire Clip System in patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgery in which clip placement is anticipated. During the surgery procedure, the necessary clips will be placed using the aforementioned multi-shot clip system. Participants will be followed up for 6 months after the operation. Through an on-site visit and a telephone call visit, data on possible adverse events related to the device or procedure will be collected in order to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of these devices.

Detailed description

The RELAP PMCF will be conducted as a prospective, single-arm, open-label and multi-center clinical investigation and will include up to 230 subjects derived for laparoscopic surgery. The clinical investigation will be conducted in up to 12 sites located in European countries. Additional sites or other countries may be approached for participation in the clinical investigation if needed. The primary objective of the RELAP Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study is to determine the long-term effectiveness of the Multi-Fire Clip System through 6-months follow-up. The secondary objective of the RELAP Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study is focused on the long-term evaluation of Multi-Fire Clip System safety and effectiveness through the collection of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs) related to both the medical device and the procedure. The primary safety and efficacy endpoint is the efficacy of long-term vessel/duct ligation defined as absence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to vessel and/or duct leakage due to incomplete ligation of the vessel/duct after appropriate placement of clip at 6 months in patients indicated for laparoscopic surgical procedure. There are several secondary endpoints planned for his clinical investigation. Firstly, all serious adverse events (SAEs) will be evaluated at 6 months. Additionally, a long-term evaluation of major adverse events (MAEs) related to both the medical device and the procedure. A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint. The time frame for the long-term evaluation will be 30-days follow-up and 6-months follow-up. Moreover, the Acute Procedural Success (APS), defined as the absence of (S)AEs within 24h after the surgery, will be assessed. The Acute Device Success, defined as the absence of (S)AEs related to the devices within the 24h after the surgery will also be evaluated. Finally, the Length of Stay (LoS) in the hospital will be evaluated. The Clinical Investigation visits will occur at Baseline, Procedure and 30-days follow-up, with a final phone call at 6 months will take place. This clinical investigation will enroll male and female adult subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic surgery using a clip. Subjects must meet all eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent prior to conducting any investigation-specific procedures not considered standard of care. The target population are subjects that require a laparoscopic surgery and a clip can be used to occlude a vessel/duct. Approximately 230 subjects will be enrolled in the clinical investigation in order to assess the primary endpoint. The expected duration of enrollment is up to 12 months. The expected duration of each subject's participation is 6 months, including the scheduled visits and data collection for this clinical investigation that will occur during the "early follow-up visit" at 30 days after the procedure and 6 months. The subject follow-up will be considered completed at the conclusion of their 6-month follow-up visit. Therefore, the total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 18 months. Regarding the statistical analysis, the primary safety and effectiveness endpoint results will be compared with the data reported in the literature for similar medical devices. The analysis population will be the per-protocol (PP) population, and the results will be presented as the incidence (in percentage) of AEs related to leakage, with a 95% confidence. Further analyses using the PP population will be performed in order to verify the statistical robustness of the results. Secondary endpoints of this clinical investigation will refer to the assessment of the safety of laparoscopic surgical procedures through the collections of all SAEs reported at 6 months. In all cases, the PP population will be the analysis population, and results will be presented as a percentage, defining a Risk Ratio (RR), with 95% confidence. Other secondary endpoints of this clinical investigation include the acute device success and acute procedural success, which will be assessed during procedure. Besides, the length of hospital stay will also be analyzed, and data will be presented as total number of days. The sample size calculation is based on the purpose to demonstrate non-inferiority of Multi-Fire Clip System compared to other metallic clips in terms of AEs related to fluid leakage. This assessment will allow to define a success rate of the long-term effectiveness and safety of M/L-10 Multi-Fire Clip System. Primary data collection based on source-documented hospital and/or clinic chart reviews will be performed clearly and accurately by site personnel trained on the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP) and Case Report Form (CRF) completion. The investigator will ensure accuracy, completeness, legibility and timeliness of the data reported to the Sponsor on the CRFs and in all required reports. Data on CRFs will be collected for all subjects that are enrolled into the clinical investigation. A Data Management Plan (DMP) will describe procedures used for data entry and collection. Data review and data cleaning, and issuing, resolving data discrepancies and methods for data base lock. The DMP will include procedures for the verification, validation and securing of electronic clinical system. The investigator/site will permit direct access to source data/documents for the purpose of performing clinical investigation-related monitoring, audits, EC review and regulatory inspections. Regulations and GCP require the Investigator to maintain information in the subject's original medical records that corroborates data collected on the CRFs. In order to comply with these regulatory requirements/GCP, medical history data, adverse events reported and their resolution as well as any other data required to substantiate data entered into the CRF, will be recorded. Data on CRFs will be collected for all subjects that are enrolled into the clinical investigation. Sponsor and/or designee will monitor the clinical investigation over its duration according to the CIP-specific monitoring plan which will include the planned extent of source data verification. This monitoring plan will be a separate document that can be updated during the course of the study. As for the safety monitoring, Measures taken to avoid bias related to safety includes 100% of source data verification related to AEs documented in the Monitoring Plan. A Sponsor representative or designee may request access to all clinical investigation records, including source documentation, for inspection during a Quality Assurance audit. This clinical investigation, sponsored by Microline Surgical Inc. (Beverly, USA), will be conducted in accordance with this CIP. All investigators involved in the conduct of the clinical investigation will be qualified by education, training, or experience to perform their tasks and this training will be documented appropriately.

Interventions

DEVICEM/L-10 Multi-Fire Clip Applier and M/L-10 Clip Cartridge (Multi-Fire Clip System)

Permanent ligation of vessels and ducts as part of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery.

Sponsors

Microline Surgical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
AKRN Scientific Consulting, S.L.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patient selection based on need for laparoscopic surgical treatment involving vessel or duct ligation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult subjects, male or female, ≥18 years old 2. Subjects who have been scheduled for a laparoscopic surgery using the clip 3. Subjects who had provided written informed consent form 4. Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements to be evaluated for each study visit

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects referred for laparoscopic surgeries to reinforce a staple line or produce partial vessel occlusion 2. Significant surgical contraindications evaluated using the GOALS score 3. Subjects unsuitable for laparoscopic surgery according to PI discretion 4. Subjects who have coagulopathy or uninterruptible anticoagulation therapy 5. Subjects currently under steroid treatment 6. Subject has known allergy to device components (i.e., titanium, stainless steel) 7. Subjects who are participating in another trial which may affect the outcomes data on this study 8. Inability to adhere to study-related procedures 9. Subjects that require emergency surgeries associated with trauma and/or sepsis with a SOFA score ≥ 2 and/or septic shock should be excluded 10. Pregnant or lactating women at the time of the surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
No Post-Operative Leakage of Ligation Sites6 months after laparoscopic surgical proceduresEfficacy of long-term vessel/duct ligation defined as absence of Adverse Events (AEs) related to vessel and/or duct leakage due to incomplete ligation of the vessel/duct after appropriate placement of clip at 6 months of laparoscopic surgical procedures. Assessment of leakage was based on follow-up inquiry six months after the ligation procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Long-term Evaluation of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) Related to the Medical Device or Procedure With 30-days Follow-up30-days follow-upMAEs are adverse events that can occur due to the operative procedure include, but are not limited to: * Major bleeding requiring reoperation * Septic shock from intraabdominal infection * Bowel injury requiring repair * Vascular injuries requiring repair * Genitourinary injuries requiring repair * Biliary injuries requiring repair * Retained foreign body, which is a patient safety incident in which a surgical object is accidentally left in a body cavity or operation wound following a procedure. MAES can also occur due to Anesthesia include, but are not limited to: * Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke) * Myocardial Infarction * Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Blood clots A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint.
All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) With 30 Days Follow-up30 days follow-up follow-up after laparoscopic surgical proceduresSAEs are Adverse Events (AEs) that meet any of the criteria below: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 5. chronic disease
Long-term Evaluation of Major Adverse Events (MAES) Related to the Medical Device or Procedure With 6-month Follow-up6-months follow-upMAEs are adverse events that can occur due to the operative procedure include, but are not limited to: * Major bleeding requiring reoperation * Septic shock from intraabdominal infection * Bowel injury requiring repair * Vascular injuries requiring repair * Genitourinary injuries requiring repair * Biliary injuries requiring repair * Retained foreign body, which is a patient safety incident in which a surgical object is accidentally left in a body cavity or operation wound following a procedure. MAES can also occur due to Anesthesia include, but are not limited to: * Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke) * Myocardial Infarction * Pulmonary Embolism (PE) * Blood clots A Risk Ratio (RR) will be defined for the analysis of this secondary endpoint.
Acute Procedural Success (APS)One day (during procedure)The Acute Procedural Success (APS) is defined as the absence of (S)AEs related to the procedure during the first 24 hours.
Acute Device Success (ADS)One day (during procedure)Acute Device Success (ADS) is defined as absence of (S)AEs related to the device during the first 24h after procedure.
Length of Stay (LoS) in HospitalUp to 30 daysPatient's length of Stay (LoS) in hospital from day of admission to hospital discharge after laparoscopic surgical procedure.
All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) With 6 Months Follow-up6 month follow-up after laparoscopic surgical proceduresSAEs are Adverse Events (AEs) that meet any of the criteria below: 1. Led to a death, 2. Led to a serious deterioration in health of the subject, that either resulted in 1. a life-threatening illness or injury, or 2. a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, or 3. in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or 4. medical or surgical intervention to prevent life threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function. 5. chronic disease

Countries

Portugal, Spain

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSalvador Morales Conde, MD

Hospital QuirónSalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The RELAP clinical investigation enrolled subjects across six clinical sites in Spain and one in Portugal. First subject enrolled: 17-Oct-2022 in Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña Last subject enrolled: 16-Feb-2024 in Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe. This study had an enrollment period of 487 days considering the range from FPI to Last Patient In LPI dates.

Pre-assignment details

Of 245 enrolled subjects, one was implanted despite later being found to meet an exclusion criterion and remained in the Safety and ITT sets. Fourteen (14) others were not included in the study population due to withdrawal, conversion to open surgery, unfavorable anatomy, device issues, or lack of sterilized equipment, resulting in no device use.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous60.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.83
Asthma
No
220 Participants
Asthma
Yes
11 Participants
Cardiovascular history
No
108 Participants
Cardiovascular history
Yes
123 Participants
Childbearing potential
No
222 Participants
Childbearing potential
Yes
9 Participants
Chronic liver disease
No
225 Participants
Chronic liver disease
Yes
6 Participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
No
203 Participants
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Yes
28 Participants
Coagulopathy
No
229 Participants
Coagulopathy
Yes
2 Participants
Connective tissue disorder
No
218 Participants
Connective tissue disorder
Yes
13 Participants
Coronary artery disease
No
221 Participants
Coronary artery disease
Yes
10 Participants
Diabetes
No
171 Participants
Diabetes
Yes
60 Participants
Gastric cancer
No
130 Participants
Gastric cancer
Yes
23 Participants
Gastric cancer
Yes, specifically gastrointestinal malignancies
78 Participants
Gastrointestinal disease
No
200 Participants
Gastrointestinal disease
Yes
31 Participants
Height [cm]163.20 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.72
Hematologic disease
No
202 Participants
Hematologic disease
Yes
29 Participants
History of allergy/hypersensitivity
No
195 Participants
History of allergy/hypersensitivity
Yes
36 Participants
Hyperlipidaemia
No
149 Participants
Hyperlipidaemia
Yes
82 Participants
Hypertension
No
124 Participants
Hypertension
Yes
107 Participants
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
No
213 Participants
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
Yes
18 Participants
Ischemic heart disease
No
222 Participants
Ischemic heart disease
Yes
9 Participants
Lung fibrosis
No
230 Participants
Lung fibrosis
Yes
1 Participants
Other cardiovascular disease
No
203 Participants
Other cardiovascular disease
Yes
28 Participants
Other gastrointestinal diseases
No
227 Participants
Other gastrointestinal diseases
Yes
4 Participants
Other pulmonary disorder
No
215 Participants
Other pulmonary disorder
Yes
16 Participants
Peripheral vascular disease
No
227 Participants
Peripheral vascular disease
Yes
4 Participants
Physical examination - Cardiovascular system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Cardiovascular system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
183 Participants
Physical examination - Cardiovascular system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
47 Participants
Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
227 Participants
Physical examination - Ears, nose, throat
Number of subjects with significant alterations
3 Participants
Physical examination - Endocrine system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Endocrine system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
202 Participants
Physical examination - Endocrine system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
28 Participants
Physical examination - Eyes
Number of subjects with missing Data
2 Participants
Physical examination - Eyes
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
219 Participants
Physical examination - Eyes
Number of subjects with significant alterations
10 Participants
Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
158 Participants
Physical examination - Gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen
Number of subjects with significant alterations
72 Participants
Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
192 Participants
Physical examination - Lungs and respiratory tract
Number of subjects with significant alterations
38 Participants
Physical examination - Lymphatic system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Lymphatic system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
206 Participants
Physical examination - Lymphatic system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
24 Participants
Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
211 Participants
Physical examination - Muscular and skeletal system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
19 Participants
Physical examination - Nervous system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Nervous system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
219 Participants
Physical examination - Nervous system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
11 Participants
Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
183 Participants
Physical examination - Peripheral vascular system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
47 Participants
Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue
Number of Subjects with normal system functioning
224 Participants
Physical Examination - Skin and connective tissue
Number of subjects with significant alterations
6 Participants
Physical examination - Urogenital system
Number of Subjects with missing Data
1 Participants
Physical examination - Urogenital system
Number of subjects with normal system functioning
202 Participants
Physical examination - Urogenital system
Number of subjects with significant alterations
28 Participants
Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery
Data Not Obtained
1 Participants
Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery
No
201 Participants
Previous non-laparoscopic/open abdominal surgery
Yes
29 Participants
Pulmonary disease
No
182 Participants
Pulmonary disease
Yes
49 Participants
Regular alcohol consumption
No
214 Participants
Regular alcohol consumption
not reported patient data
7 Participants
Regular alcohol consumption
Yes
10 Participants
Regular smoker
No
203 Participants
Regular smoker
Number of Subjects with missing Data
6 Participants
Regular smoker
Yes
22 Participants
Renal disease
No
218 Participants
Renal disease
Yes
13 Participants
Respiratory failure
No
231 Participants
Respiratory failure
Yes
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
117 Participants
Stroke
No
227 Participants
Stroke
Yes
4 Participants
Weight [kg]84.97 Kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.96

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
7 / 231
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 231
serious
Total, serious adverse events
73 / 231

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026