Neuropathic Pain, Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
Conditions
Brief summary
The investigators have shown in incomplete SCI patients that long-term paired associative stimulation is capable of restoring voluntary control over some paralyzed muscles and enhancing motor output in the weak muscles. In this study, the investigators will administer long-term paired associative stimulation to patients with incomplete cervical level SCI and SCI- associated neuropathic pain, and investigate its effectiveness for neuropathic pain treatment.
Interventions
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) administered 3-5 times per week for 4 weeks to upper limbs. PAS comprises transcranial magnetic stimulation (eXimia magnetic stimulator, Nexstim Ltd, Helsinki, Finland) and peripheral nerve stimulation (given with Dantec Keypoint® electroneuromyography device (Natus Medical Incorporated, Pleasanton, CA, USA)).
Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation and sham peripheral nerve stimulation.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* incomplete cervical spinal cord injury * time from injury at least 1.5 years * chronic SCI- induced neuropathic pain in the upper limb
Exclusion criteria
* Diagnosed brain damage, visible in MRI or CT. * No activity in hands/fingers and no MEPs recorded from distal hand muscles. * Epilepsy * Metal inclusion in the head area * High intracranial pressure * Pacemaker * Implanted hearing device * Progressive diseases of spinal cord or brain (e.g. malignant tumors, degenerative diseases). * Previous head or spinal cord injury affecting the motor performance of upper extremities. * Congenital anomaly in the anatomical structure of spinal canal/cord or dura. * Significant systemic disease or other condition that could cause neurological deficit, or may affect subject's capability to undergo investigation-related procedures. * Acute severe infection. * Contraindications for MRI. * Current severe psychiatric diseases. * Current chronic drug and/or alcohol abuse. * Pregnancy. * Pressure ulcer affecting the subject's capability to undergo the procedure safely
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Pain Inventory | Change from baseline at 1 day after the intervention | 0-10 scale, 0 - no pain, 10 - worst possible pain. |
| Numeric Rating Scale | Change from baseline at 1 day after the intervention | 0-10 scale, 0 - no pain, 10 - worst possible pain. |
Countries
Finland