Skip to content

The Safety and Tolerability of Engensis (VM202) in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Subtype 1A (CMT1A)

Single Center, Open Label, Repeat Intramuscular Administration, 270 Days, Phase I/2a Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability of Investigational Product (Engensis: VM202) With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Subtype 1A (CMT1A)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05361031
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-05-04
Start date
2020-09-21
Completion date
2022-02-22
Last updated
2025-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CMT

Brief summary

To assess the safety and tolerability of the investigational product Engensis (VM202) injected in the weakened lower limb muscles of CMT1A patients

Detailed description

There are no therapeutic agents for CMT to date. Attempts were made to develop therapeutic agents, but efficacy could not be demonstrated in clinical studies. Most of the attempted developments for therapeutic agents targeted alleviating the symptoms of CMT1A by regulating the expression of PMP22. This study will use Engensis (VM202), which is a DNA plasmid that contains novel genomic cDNA hybrid human HGF coding sequence (HGF-X7) expressing two isoforms of HGF, HGF 728 and HGF 723. HGF has been thought of as an angiogenic factor, but it has been recently identified as serving the role of a neurotrophic factor. Moreover, it has been reported that it can contribute to muscle tissue regeneration by targeting on muscles. Considering the pathologic mechanism of CMT, the biological activity of HGF helps peripheral nerve regeneration, relieves muscle atrophy, and reduces pain, so it is highly likely to show a therapeutic effect for CMT.

Interventions

Intramuscular injections

Sponsors

Helixmith Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Single center, repeat dose, open label, phase I/IIA clinical study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females ≥ 19 years of age and ≤ 65 years of age 2. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of CMT1A by genetic testing 3. Patients with mild to moderate severity assessed by Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2 (CMTNS v2) with a score \> 2 and ≤ 20 4. Individuals with lower limb muscle weakness with minimum dorsiflexion or more 5. Individuals who voluntarily consented to participate in this study and signed the IRB approved informed consent form after listening to a description on the characteristics of this clinical study prior to all screening tests 6. Individuals who can comply with the requirements in the clinical study 7. In case of females of child bearing potential, those who test negative in a urine or serum pregnancy test at screening 8. Individuals who practice medically approved contraceptive methods throughout the clinical study

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with significant respiratory, circulatory, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, hematologic, psychiatric disorders or other severe diseases, or alcohol or drug addiction who may develop safety issues or cause confusion in the interpretation of the clinical study results as determined by the principal investigator 2. Patients with other neuromuscular diseases or neuropathy-inducing factors: Patients with chronic alcohol addiction, undergoing anticancer chemotherapy, or taking neurotoxic drugs 3. Patients diagnosed with diabetes 4. Patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease 5. Patients with a history of stroke or cerebral ischemic attack within 12 months prior to the screening date 6. Patients with a history of coronary artery disease, such as myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris, within 12 months prior to the screening date 7. Morbidly obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 37 8. Patients who underwent orthopedic surgery (corrective surgery for bone and ligament, artificial joint implantation, osteosynthesis, osteotomy, arthroscopic surgery) in the lower limbs within 6 months prior to the screening date 9. Patients who may be affected by the muscle strength measurement test due to ankle contracture or surgery 10. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (if systolic blood pressure is ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure is ≥ 100 mmHg at screening) 11. Patients or patient's immediate family members (parents, siblings, offspring) with a history of malignant tumors within the last 5 years prior to the screening date, excluding basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma that occurs on the skin (if it is determined that there is no possibility of relapse after resection), or with a family history of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) 12. Patients who have not completed a national cancer screening program applicable to their sex and age (if it cannot be confirmed that the relevant test was received at a national cancer screening center or a recognized screening center) However, if it is confirmed that the relevant test was received at a national cancer screening center or a recognized screening center during the screening period, and that the results were within normal range, the patients may participate in the clinical study. Common to males and females: If a patient is ≥ 50 years of age, the results of a colonoscopy within 5 years prior to the screening must be determined as being within normal range, and if adenomatous polyps are evident, the results of a colonoscopy within 1 year must be determined as being within normal range (inflammatory polyps or hyperplastic polyps are included in the normal range). If a patient is ≥ 40 years of age, the results of a gastroscopy within 2 years prior to the screening must be within normal range. If a patient is ≥ 54 years of age and has a 30 pack-year history of smoking or more, the results of a low-dose chest CT within 2 years prior to the screening must be within normal range. In case of liver cancer, carriers of hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus and patients with hepatic cirrhosis fall under the

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in ParticipantsDay 0 visit to the Day 270 visitFrequency and percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events after injections, injection site reactions, vital sign, and clinically significant laboratory values for Engensis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Patient's Neurological Disability - Functional Disability ScoreDay 0, 90, 180 and Day 270Change from Baseline (Day 0) in Functional Disability Scale at Days 90, 180, and 270; as assessed using the Functional Disability Scale 0 - 8 points, where normal is 0 point, best case, and if determined as bedridden, it is evaluated as 8 points, worst case. 0=normal; 1=cramps and fatigability; 2=inability to run; 3=possible unaided; 4=with cane; 5=with crutch; 6=with walker; 7=wheelchair; 8=bedridden. Changes in severity of disease: Functional Disability Scale - Intent-to-Treat population.
Evaluation of the Activity Level of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score Leg ScaleDay 0, 90, 180 and Day 270Change from baseline (Day 0) in the overall neuropathy limitation score leg scale at Days 90, 180, and 270. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score is scored from 0 to 7. The worst score, 7 points, is defined as restricted to wheelchair, or bed most of the day, unable to make any purposeful movements of the leg.
Evaluation of Patient's Walking Ability - Change From Baseline in the 10-Meter Walk TestDay 0, 90, 180 and Day 270This test measures the time in seconds required for a subject to walk 10 meters through the 10-Meter Walking Test version 2.2. Changes in the Mean Time in seconds for lower limb function assessment: 10 Meter Walk Test - Intent to Treat population, from Day 0 to Days 90, 180, and 270. The larger the change in time (Seconds) from Day 0 to Visit date indicates a worsening of the patients walking ability.
Evaluation of Severity of Disease Changes Following Engensis Injections - Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score Version 2Day 0 and Day 270Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2 is a measurement tool for evaluating the severity of disease. The scoring system is the total neuropathy score, by assessing the symptoms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth patients due to sensory impairment. Measurements were performed in three items for the symptoms of disease, four items for the signs, and two items for neurophysiological testing, a total of nine separate test items. The Total Severity Score is the summed scores of all subscores and has a total minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 36. The Total Severity Score Scale of the disease is classified according to the Total Score as either mild (0 to 10), moderate (11 to 20), or severe (20 to 36). The Change from Baseline Total Severity Score is the difference between the Day 0 and the Day 270 scores. A negative difference in the Total Severity Score Change from Baseline to Day 270, indicates an improvement of the treated groups' total severity level.
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Day 0 and Day 270Change from baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity to Day 270, for evaluation of the presence of a disorder in a neurotransmission pathway, as assessed using the Nerve Conduction Study version 2.0 Nerve regeneration potential (Electroneurography): Nerve Conduction Velocity (measured in meters per second) - Intent-to-Treat population. Larger negative change from baseline values indicates a slowing of the Nerve Conduction Velocity which is a worsening of the electroconduction function of the specified nerve.
Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.Day 0 and Day 270The presence of hepatocyte growth factor antibody generation by Engensis (VM202) assessed using anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibody test at Day 0 and Day 270
Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesDay 0 and Day 270Changes from baseline (Day 0) in the fat content of lower limb muscles at Day 270. The muscles of lower limbs were imaged with Magnetic Resonance Imaging leg scan, and the degree of fatty infiltration of the leg muscles injected with the investigational product was measured and valuated as fat content value (percent) at one level for each muscle. The six MRI imaging sites to be measured were as follows: peroneus longus left/right, gastrocnemius left/right, and tibialis anterior left/right.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Engensis (VM202)
56 (ea) 0.25mg (0.5 mL) injections in each of the left and right lower limbs on Days 0, 14, 90, and 104. Engensis (VM202): Intramuscular injections
12
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEngensis (VM202)
Age, Continuous40.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.81
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in Participants

Frequency and percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events after injections, injection site reactions, vital sign, and clinically significant laboratory values for Engensis.

Time frame: Day 0 visit to the Day 270 visit

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Engensis (VM202)Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in ParticipantsInjection site pruritis1 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in ParticipantsOedema peripheral1 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in ParticipantsPneumonia1 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Safety of Intramuscular (IM) Injections of Engensis in ParticipantsUterine leiomyoma1 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270

Change from baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity to Day 270, for evaluation of the presence of a disorder in a neurotransmission pathway, as assessed using the Nerve Conduction Study version 2.0 Nerve regeneration potential (Electroneurography): Nerve Conduction Velocity (measured in meters per second) - Intent-to-Treat population. Larger negative change from baseline values indicates a slowing of the Nerve Conduction Velocity which is a worsening of the electroconduction function of the specified nerve.

Time frame: Day 0 and Day 270

Population: Intent-to-Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right median nerve0.08 meters/secondStandard Deviation 1.73
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right ulnar nerve0 meters/secondStandard Deviation 2.04
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right radial nerve-1.25 meters/secondStandard Deviation 2.9
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right tibial nerve-0.25 meters/secondStandard Deviation 1.86
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right peroneal nerve1.33 meters/secondStandard Deviation 4.31
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Right sural nerve-0.17 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.39
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left median nerve0.25 meters/secondStandard Deviation 1.36
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left ulnar nerve-0.08 meters/secondStandard Deviation 1.83
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left radial nerve-1.83 meters/secondStandard Deviation 5.54
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left tibial nerve1.33 meters/secondStandard Deviation 6.21
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left peroneal nerve-1.33 meters/secondStandard Deviation 4.44
Engensis (VM202)Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Velocity at Day 270Left sural nerve-0.33 meters/secondStandard Deviation 0.78
Secondary

Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb Muscles

Changes from baseline (Day 0) in the fat content of lower limb muscles at Day 270. The muscles of lower limbs were imaged with Magnetic Resonance Imaging leg scan, and the degree of fatty infiltration of the leg muscles injected with the investigational product was measured and valuated as fat content value (percent) at one level for each muscle. The six MRI imaging sites to be measured were as follows: peroneus longus left/right, gastrocnemius left/right, and tibialis anterior left/right.

Time frame: Day 0 and Day 270

Population: Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesRight peroneus longus1.79 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 3.36
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesRight gastrocnemius0.22 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 1.66
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesRight tibialis anterior1.91 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 2.34
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesLeft peroneus longus3.21 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 6.66
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesLeft gastrocnemius0.24 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 2.53
Engensis (VM202)Changes in Fatty Infiltration Level of Lower Limb MusclesLeft tibialis anterior0.07 percentage fat contentStandard Deviation 2.83
Secondary

Evaluation of Patient's Neurological Disability - Functional Disability Score

Change from Baseline (Day 0) in Functional Disability Scale at Days 90, 180, and 270; as assessed using the Functional Disability Scale 0 - 8 points, where normal is 0 point, best case, and if determined as bedridden, it is evaluated as 8 points, worst case. 0=normal; 1=cramps and fatigability; 2=inability to run; 3=possible unaided; 4=with cane; 5=with crutch; 6=with walker; 7=wheelchair; 8=bedridden. Changes in severity of disease: Functional Disability Scale - Intent-to-Treat population.

Time frame: Day 0, 90, 180 and Day 270

Population: Changes in severity of disease: Functional Disability Scale - Intent-to-Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Neurological Disability - Functional Disability ScoreDay 900.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Neurological Disability - Functional Disability ScoreDay 180-0.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Neurological Disability - Functional Disability ScoreDay 270-0.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Secondary

Evaluation of Patient's Walking Ability - Change From Baseline in the 10-Meter Walk Test

This test measures the time in seconds required for a subject to walk 10 meters through the 10-Meter Walking Test version 2.2. Changes in the Mean Time in seconds for lower limb function assessment: 10 Meter Walk Test - Intent to Treat population, from Day 0 to Days 90, 180, and 270. The larger the change in time (Seconds) from Day 0 to Visit date indicates a worsening of the patients walking ability.

Time frame: Day 0, 90, 180 and Day 270

Population: Changes in the mean time in seconds for lower limb function assessment: 10 Meter Walk Test - Intent to Treat population, from Day 0 to Days 90, 180, and 270

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Walking Ability - Change From Baseline in the 10-Meter Walk TestDay 900.02 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.15
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Walking Ability - Change From Baseline in the 10-Meter Walk TestDay 1800.08 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.2
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Patient's Walking Ability - Change From Baseline in the 10-Meter Walk TestDay 2700.06 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Evaluation of Severity of Disease Changes Following Engensis Injections - Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score Version 2

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2 is a measurement tool for evaluating the severity of disease. The scoring system is the total neuropathy score, by assessing the symptoms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth patients due to sensory impairment. Measurements were performed in three items for the symptoms of disease, four items for the signs, and two items for neurophysiological testing, a total of nine separate test items. The Total Severity Score is the summed scores of all subscores and has a total minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 36. The Total Severity Score Scale of the disease is classified according to the Total Score as either mild (0 to 10), moderate (11 to 20), or severe (20 to 36). The Change from Baseline Total Severity Score is the difference between the Day 0 and the Day 270 scores. A negative difference in the Total Severity Score Change from Baseline to Day 270, indicates an improvement of the treated groups' total severity level.

Time frame: Day 0 and Day 270

Population: Total Severity Score, and Change from Baseline of Total Severity Score of disease: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score-version 2 - Intent to Treat population from Day 0 to Day 270.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Severity of Disease Changes Following Engensis Injections - Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score Version 2Day 0 - Total Severity Score15.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Severity of Disease Changes Following Engensis Injections - Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score Version 2Day 270 - Total Severity Score13.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of Severity of Disease Changes Following Engensis Injections - Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score Version 2Day 270 - Change from Baseline of Total Severity Scores-2.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
Secondary

Evaluation of the Activity Level of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score Leg Scale

Change from baseline (Day 0) in the overall neuropathy limitation score leg scale at Days 90, 180, and 270. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score is scored from 0 to 7. The worst score, 7 points, is defined as restricted to wheelchair, or bed most of the day, unable to make any purposeful movements of the leg.

Time frame: Day 0, 90, 180 and Day 270

Population: Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of the Activity Level of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score Leg ScaleDay 90-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of the Activity Level of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score Leg ScaleDay 180-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Engensis (VM202)Evaluation of the Activity Level of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score Leg ScaleDay 270-0.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.

The presence of hepatocyte growth factor antibody generation by Engensis (VM202) assessed using anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibody test at Day 0 and Day 270

Time frame: Day 0 and Day 270

Population: Intent to Treat population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Engensis (VM202)Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.No - HGF antibody not present at baseline12 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.No - HGF antibody not present at Day 27012 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.Yes - HGF antibody present at baseline0 Participants
Engensis (VM202)Numbers of Participants With and Without Hepatocyte Growth Factor Antibody Generation in the Body at Baseline (Day 0) and Day 270.Yes - presence of HGF antibody at Day 2700 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026