Esthetic Zone, Immediate Implants, Labial Bone Dimensional Changes, Thin Labial Plate of Bone Pre-extraction, With Labial Grafting, Without Labial Bone Grafting
Conditions
Brief summary
For the dimension of the peri-implant buccal gap, a controversy is present whether complete bone formation labial to the implant. Therefore, leaving the blood clot in the large socket around implants without augmentation is questionable to result in complete bone fill and would not affect the buccal contour collapse. The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the labial bone dimensional changes after immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone with & without bone grafting inside the socket by using CBCT superimposition (Fusion) scans.
Interventions
PROCEDUREimmediate implant placement without bone grafting
After atraumatic extraction of the non-restorable tooth using periotome and luxators, osteotomy site preparation will be done & patients will receive an immediate post-extraction implant without any grafting material in the socket between the residual labial bone and implant surface. After implant insertion, the labial bone dimensions of the buccal peri-implant defect will be measured using Automated Voxel Superimposition Method of CBCT scans. All the patients in this study had two scans; primary (preoperative) scan and secondary (Postoperative) scan, with standardization of the exposure parameters. All datafrom CBCT examinations were acquired in a DICOM format which were imported to OnDemand3D ®App software (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). superimposition of DICOM sets of each patient using Fusion module of Ondemand 3D App software was done.
PROCEDUREimmediate implant placement with socket bone grafting
After atraumatic extraction of the non-restorable tooth using periotome and luxators, osteotomy site preparation will be done and patients will receive an immediate post-extraction implant with placing bovine bone graft (Bio-oss) in the socket between the residual labial bone and implant surface. After implant insertion, the labial bone dimensions of the buccal peri-implant defect will be measured using Automated Voxel Superimposition Method of CBCT scans. All the patients in this study had two scans; primary (preoperative) scan and secondary (Postoperative) scan, with standardization of the exposure parameters. All datafrom CBCT examinations were acquired in a DICOM format which were imported to OnDemand3D ®App software (Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). In order to ensure standardization and reproducibility of the CBCT cross sectional images used in this study, superimposition of DICOM sets of each patient using Fusion module of Ondemand 3D App software was done.
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. adult (\>20 years) with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the esthetic zone, 2. thick gingival phenotype, 3. intact but thin labial plate of bone (≤1mm) 4. intact palatal bone extending at least 6mm apically, 5. sufficient apical bone to attain implant primary stability (a minimum of 35 Ncm insertion torque) 6. labio-palatal socket dimension measured from the CBCT axial cut at mid-crestal part ≥5mm. 7. patients agreed to sign a written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
1. smokers, 2. pregnant women, 3. patients with systemic disease, 4. patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching, 5. infected socket, 6. periapical pathosis 7. history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the past 2 years.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| vertical bone dimensional changes | 1 year | CBCT superimposition (fusion scans) |
| Amount of bone labial to the implant | 1 year | CBCT superimposition (fusion scans) |
| Horizontal labio-palatal bone width | 1 year | CBCT superimposition (fusion scans) |
| horizontal labio-palatal bone collapse | 1 year | CBCT superimposition (fusion scans) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| gingival index | 1 year | bleeding on probing around customized healing abutments placed on the immediate implants |
| Implant failure | 1 year | The following are the criteria of the implant success: the absence of mobility, the absence of acute or chronic peri-implant infection, the absence of radiolucency around the implant, without pocket probing depth (PPD) ≧ 5 mm, and without vertical bone loss ≧ 1.5 mm in the first year. The cases will be defined as failure if it can't reach any one of the success criteria. |
| Plaque Index | 1 year | Plaque index |
| Postoperative Pain | 1 day, 3 days, 7 days | VAS |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed