Skip to content

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05359926
Acronym
EDUCaRe
Enrollment
0
Registered
2022-05-04
Start date
2022-06-09
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2025-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ambulation, Foley Catheterization

Keywords

lumbar spine, foley catheterization, ambulation

Brief summary

The study aims to compare between early versus delayed urinary catheter removal the impact on time to ambulation (in minutes) after minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery

Detailed description

Early ambulation enables rapid removal of drainage tubes and canisters and decreases length of hospitalization. Previous article showed that a 1-day shorter in hospitalization led to an approximately US$ 2000 reduction in total patient costs. Another study examining patients after total knee arthroplasty found that an early discharge group, a decrease in length of stay in 22h resulted in financial savings of approximately US$ 600 per case. Another author found that early ambulation was associated with 19% lower 90-day readmission rate. Moreover, early ambulation contributed to 50.6% lower probability of developing at least one complication than regular ambulation.

Interventions

OTHERExperimental

Early urethral foley removal after the surgery

OTHERActive comparator

Delayed urethral foley removal after the surgery

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years and older * Minimally invasive one- or two-level lumbar fusion procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that cannot give consent * Patients with lower extremity amputation(s); * Non-minimally invasive surgeries * Patients with pre-existing bladder/kidney or urinary tract dysfunction * Patients with spinal cord injuries * Patients with known lower extremity weakness and impaired mobility.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AmbulationAfter the surgery, postoperative day 1Time in minutes to ambulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Home dischargeAverage postoperative day 1-3Number of subjects discharge to home
Hospital length of stay1 to 3 daysTotal number of days in the hospital
Pain medicationHospitalization period: postoperative day 1, 2, 3Total dose of opioid medication in milligrams used by each subject
Facility dischargeAverage postoperative day 1-3Number of subjects discharge to facility
Urinary tract infectionFrom date of the surgery until the date of first documented event, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 month after the surgeryTotal number of urinary tract infection after urinary catheter removal
Physical therapy progressionHospitalization period: postoperative day 1, 2, 3Maximum walking distance tolerated in meters by each subject
Urinary catheter reinsertionFrom date of the surgery until the date of first documented event, whichever came first, assessed up to discharge (1 to 3 days) after the surgeryTotal number of urinary catheter reinsertion

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026