COVID-19
Conditions
Keywords
electronic Coronavirus Disease Recommendation Map (eCOVID RecMap), Plain Language Recommendation, Standard Language Versions, Public Engagement, Knowledge Mobilization
Brief summary
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) recommendations are usually developed for healthcare professionals (for example Doctors, health organizations, etc.). It is important to make sure that these recommendations can be used and understood by everyone. This study aims to make COVID-19 recommendations more accessible and understandable for parents and caregivers, adults, and youth.
Detailed description
This is a two-arm superiority randomized controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the understanding of key guideline information between the Plain Language Recommendation (PLR) (intervention) and the Standard Language Version (SLV- original recommendation as available in the published guideline) (comparison). Secondary outcomes include accessibility and usability of the information, satisfaction with the presentation, intended behavior to follow the information in the recommendation, and preference toward one of the two presentations. Recruitment will be global for the three populations (youth, parents, and adults), using three different online links. Data will be collected using a survey with 1:1 randomization to the intervention and subsequent demographic questions. Superiority will be declared if a minimal difference of 10% in understanding is achieved between the two groups (an average difference of 1 correct answer).
Interventions
OTHERPlain Language Recommendation (PLR)
New easy to read COVID-19 recommendations available on the COVID19 Living Map of Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization (RecMap).
OTHERStandard Language Version (SLV)
Original recommendation as initially published by the guideline organization.
Sponsors
The Hospital for Sick Children
Western University
University of Alberta
McMaster University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* For youth population: be between the ages of 15 to 24 years * For parents population: be 18 years and above and making decisions with or for their children (parent, caregiver, the legal guardian of a child \< 18 years) * For adults: be 21 years of age or older * Need to be able to complete the survey in English
Exclusion criteria
* Individuals not fitting any of the above age categories or language requirement
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Understanding with Multiple Choice Questions | Duration of survey (approximately 25 minutes) at baseline | The primary outcome is understanding. Understanding is defined as the correct comprehension of key guideline content (year of publication, intent of the recommendation, direction of recommendation, etc.). This outcome will be measured with seven multiple-choice questions about key concepts in the recommendation with four to six response options for each question and only one correct answer (total minimum score of 0, maximum score of 7). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility and Usability on a Seven-Point Likert Scale | Duration of survey (approximately 25 minutes) at baseline | Accessibility and Usability is defined as the ability to find/access, and use the presented information. This outcome considers the three following domains: (1) how easy it was to find information, (2) how easy it was to understand the information (perception), and (3) whether the information was presented in a way that could be helpful for making an informed health decision. Participants will have to indicate the degree of agreement with six statements, measured using the original 7-point Likert scale (1 being strongly disagree, 4 being neutral, and 7 being strongly agree). The outcome 'overall accessibility of information' will be measured using the 7-point Likert-type scale. |
| Satisfaction on a Seven-Point Likert Scale | Duration of survey (approximately 25 minutes) at baseline | Satisfaction is defined as participants' impression of the recommendation's presentation. This will be measured using questions related to participants' level of satisfaction with the different features of the format (e.g. feature of explaining the certainty of the evidence). Participants will have to indicate the degree of satisfaction with three questions measured using the original 7-point Likert-type scale (11 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = somewhat dissatisfied, 4 = neutral, 5 = somewhat satisfied, 6 = satisfied, 7 = very satisfied). Participants will also have to answer three open-ended questions to get their input on what they liked and disliked in the format. |
| Intended Behavior on a Seven-Point Likert Scale and Multiple Choice Questions | Duration of survey (approximately 25 minutes) at baseline | Intended behavior is defined as participants' intention in adopting and following the shared recommendation. Participants will answer a question on whether they have already followed and implemented the recommendation in their jurisdiction and have them respond with yes, no, unsure, or not applicable. Subsequently, they will be asked how likely it is that they will follow and share the recommendation through two questions measured using a 7-point Likert-scale (1 = very unlikely, 2 = unlikely, 3 = somewhat unlikely, 4 = neutral, 5 = somewhat likely, 6 = likely, 7 = very likely. |
| Preference on a Seven-Point Likert-Scale | Duration of survey (approximately 25 minutes) at baseline | Preference is defined as a greater liking of one format over the other (PLR or SLV). All participants will get to compare the optimized PLR and the SLV; after having completed the tasks in the group they were randomized to, participants will review the alternative format and indicate their preference for one of the two formats using a 7-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly prefer SLV, 2 = prefer SLV, 3 = somewhat prefer SLV, 4 = same preference for SLV and PLR, 5 = somewhat prefer PLR, 6 = prefer PLR, 7 = strongly prefer PLR). |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed