Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Entelon 50mg in Patients With Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Superiority, Phase IV Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Entelon 50mg Compared to Placebo in Patients With Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05358080
Enrollment
396
Registered
2022-05-03
Start date
2022-05-27
Completion date
2024-12-16
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Brief summary

This clinical trial is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled , parallel design, superiority, phase 4 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Entelon 50mg in 396 patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Detailed description

This study is to prove that Entelon tab. 50mg is superior in clinical efficacy and safety compared to placebo for 24 months in patients suffering from non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Interventions

DRUGEntelon Tab. 50mg

twice daily for 24months

DRUGPlacebo

twice daily for 24months

Sponsors

Hanlim Pharm. Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 19 years ≤ age 2. Those who are diagnosed as Type 2 diabetes mellitus 3. Those whose blood sugar level has been well adjusted to less than 9% of HbA1c with dietary and oral blood sugar lowering durgs for 3 months based on the time of screening 4. Those who agree to use an effective method of contraception 5. Those who provide written consent voluntarily to participate in this clinical trial Inclusion criteria for the study eye 1. Those with 0.5(20/40 Snellen lines) or more visual acuity 2. Those with 300 micrometers or less central macular thickness 3. Those who are diagnosed as mild to moderate NPDR(DRSS levels 35-47)

Exclusion criteria

1. Those who are diagnosed as proliferative diabetic retinopathy 2. Those with macular edema 3. Diabetic subjects who have difficulty in controlling blood sugar 4. Those whose blood pressure is not well controlled at the time of the screening(\>140/90mmHg) 5. Those who, have had stroke or myocardial infarction or arrhythmia that should be treated within 6 months prior to the time of screening 6. Subjects with severe renal disorder or severe liver disorder 7. Those who have a history of malignant tumors within 5 years prior to the time of screening 8. Those who are required to receive Kallidinogenase, Vaccinium myrtillus extract, Sulodexide, or Calcium dobesilate during the clinical trial period 9. Those who have an allergy to investigational product or any of its excipients 10. Those who have an allergy to fluorescein 11. Those who have galactose intolerance, lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption 12. Those who have difficulty to get OCT test or Fundus photo test 13. Pregnant or lactating woman 14. Those with medication of other investigational product within 3 months prior to the time of randomization 15. Patients who are considered to be ineligible for study participation by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of subjects maintained or improved in DRSS level24 months(Visit 10)Change at 24 months of treatment with the drug from baseline(day 0) in DRSS(Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale) level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of subjects maintained or improved or worsened in DRSS12 months(Visit 6), 24 months(Visit 10)Percentage of subjects with no change in DRSS(diabetic retinopathy severity scale) compared to baseline at 12 or 24 months compared to baseline, improved one or more levels, improved two or more levels, worsened one or more levels, and worsened two or more levels
Amount of change BCVA letter24 months(Visit 10)Amount of change in BCVA(best corrected visual acuity) letters at 24 months relative to baseline
Proportion of subjects improved or worsened in BCVA24 months(Visit 10)Proportion of subjects with improved five or more letters in BCVA(best corrected visual acuity) and worsened five or more letters at 24 months compared to baseline
Proportion of subjects maintained or improved in DRSS level12 months(Visit 6)Change at 12 months of treatment with the drug from baseline(day 0) in DRSS(Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale) level
Change in CMT and TMV6 month(Visit 4), 12 month(Visit 6), 18 month(Visit 8), 24 month(Visit 10)Amount of change in CMT(Central macular thickness) and TMV(Total macular volume)
Proportion of subjects with CSMEthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsProportion of subjects with CSME(Clinically significant macular edema)
Change in quantitative of hard exudate6 months(Visit 4), 12 months(Visit 6), 18 months(Visit 8), 24 months(Visit 10)Amount and rate of change in quantitative of hard exudate through fundus photo

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactHa Kyoung Kim
ophkim@hallym.or.kr82-2-6960-1240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026