Colorectal Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Colorectal Cancer Screening, Personalized Risk, Risk Communication, Shared Decision Making, Screening Behavior
Brief summary
The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC. The secondary objectives: * Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes; * Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates. The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of participants' risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to a participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels. This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be effectively prevented by screening. Risk to develop CRC within 15 years is related to increasing age, sex, family history, and lifestyle and, thus, can vary from \<1% to \>15%. Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy are the most widely used screening tests. Colonoscopy is the most accurate test, but is related to risks of bleeding and perforation. Colonoscopy resources are limited, and high uptake of screening colonoscopy for low-risk individuals can cause long wait times for those with CRC symptoms or positive FIT. FIT is less costly can be done at home without preparation and, if done regularly, prevents most CRC mortality, especially in moderate and low-risk individuals. To offer the screening options with a reasonable risk-benefit balance, FIT should be recommended to individuals at low (\<3% to develop CRC in 15 years) and moderate (3-6%) risk, and colonoscopy to those at high (\>6%) risk. The primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC. The secondary objectives: * Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes; * Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates. The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of the participant's risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels. This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALIntervention brochure
Provide participants with information about their personalized risk for colorectal cancer and appropriate screening recommendations to facilitate their screening option choice.
BEHAVIORALControl brochure
Provide participants with general information about options for colorectal cancer screening.
Sponsors
Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Aged between 50 and 69; * Residents of the Canton of Vaud; * Have signed an informed consent (paper or electronic).
Exclusion criteria
* Current CRC symptoms; * Personal CRC history; * In colonoscopy surveillance for follow-up of high-risk polyp(s); * Inflammatory bowel disease; * Having done a colonoscopy within 9 years or a FIT within 1,5 years; * Planning to leave Switzerland definitively within the next six months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported appropriate screening uptake | 6-8 months after the intervention | Proportion who completed screening test appropriate to risk level. For low risk (\<3% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT. For intermediate risk (3-6%15-yr CRC risk), completing a FIT, completing a colonoscopy, or having a colonoscopy appointment. For high risk (\>6% 15-yr CRC risk), completing a colonoscopy or having a colonoscopy appointment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participation in the randomized trial | 6 weeks after mailed invitations | Proportion of those invited with completed paper or electronic consent |
| Eligibility for the Vaud CRC screening program | 6 weeks after mailed invitations | Proportion of those who returned the baseline questionnaire who are eligible for the Vaud screening program (i.e. not up-to-date with screening, not in colonoscopy surveillance, no personal CRC history, etc.) |
| Self-reported overall screening participation | 6-8 months after the intervention | Proportion who completed any CRC screening test (FIT, colonoscopy, colonoscopy appointment, CT colonography, blood test, etc. |
| Linkage to Vaud CRC screening program | 3-6 months after measurement of primary outcome | Proportion of study participants who consent and whose screening status are obtained from the Vaud CRC screening program |
| Linkage to Vaud tumor registry | 6 months to 10 years after measurement of primary outcome | Proportion of study participants who consent and whose cancer status are obtained from the Vaud tumor registry. Long time frame chosen given considerable delay in updating the tumor registry and interest in cancer outcomes several years after measurement of primary outcome. |
| Self-reported anxiety | 6 weeks after mailed invitations | Mean anxiety score using adapted questions from a standardized questionnaire (STAI Fr) |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed