Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
segmental muscle vibration,spasticity,upper limb function
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.
Detailed description
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability and is often associated with persistent involvement of upper limbs.Several disturbances are the manifestation of UL impairments after stroke (i.e., muscle weakness, changes in muscle tone, joint disturbances, impaired motor control) . Muscular weakness and spasticity are most commonly observed in post stroke patients. There are many strategies are developed to improve functional status and to reduce spasticity pattern in post stroke patients. Among the different approaches to improve motor functions in post stroke patients, vibration therapy gives strong stimulatory effects in post paretic limb. Segmental muscle vibration (SMV) is a fairly new technique that has been used to improve motor function and inhibit spasticity in the hemiplegic upper extremity of patients following a stroke. In SMV, a vibratory stimulus is applied to a specific muscle tendon using a mechanical device unit.The aim of this study is to observe and to compare effects of segmental vibration on flexors versus extensor muscle groups on upper limb function in post-stroke patients. This study will be helpful in finding out that either low frequency segmental vibration on flexors muscle group is better in improving upper limb function or low frequency segmental vibration on extensor muscle group is more beneficent in improving upper limb function.
Interventions
Segmental muscle vibration will delivered over the target muscles by means of vibrator with general physical therapy session
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Assignment
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Both genders * Age: between 50-65 years. * Spasticity 1-3 on MAS * 3-6 months post stroke patients
Exclusion criteria
* Cardiovascular event (myocardial ischemia or infarction) occurring within 12 months, * Use of any antispastic drug * Pain from vibration * Inflammatory osteoarticular diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Wolf Motor Functional Test | 10 to 15 minutes | WMFT is valid and reliable on assessing upper extremities motor function of stroke patients. The WFMT is a tool with high interrater reliability, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and adequate stability. |
| Modified Ashworth Scale | 4 to 5 minutes | This scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity |
| Fugl Meyer Assessment | 10 minutes | Fugl Meyer Assessment |
| Manual Muscle Testing | 8 to 10 minutes | to check muscle strength |
| • Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery • Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery Brunnstrom Stages of Stroke Recovery | 5 to 10 minutes | to check the stages of improvemnet |
Countries
Pakistan