Skip to content

Remote Ischemic Conditioning, Bimanual Skill Learning, and Corticospinal Excitability

Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bimanual Skill Learning, Bimanual Coordination, and Corticospinal Excitability in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05355883
Enrollment
51
Registered
2022-05-02
Start date
2021-12-18
Completion date
2025-05-30
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unilateral Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Keywords

Cerebral palsy, Bimanual coordination, Corticospinal excitability

Brief summary

Unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is a leading cause of childhood disability. An early brain injury impairs the upper extremity function, bimanual coordination, and impacts the child's independence. The existing therapeutic interventions have higher training doses and modest effect sizes. Thus, there is a critical need to find an effective priming agent to enhance bimanual skill learning in children with UCP. This study aims to determine the effects of a novel priming agent, remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), when paired with intensive bimanual skill training to enhance bimanual skill learning and to augment skill dependent plasticity in children with UCP.

Detailed description

Ischemic conditioning (IC) is a phenomenon of protecting the target organ from ischemia by directly exposing it to brief episodes of sublethal ischemia. RIC is a clinically feasible way of performing IC where episodes of ischemia and reperfusion are delivered with cyclic inflation and deflation of a blood pressure cuff on the arm or leg. Pre-clinical and preliminary clinical trials in humans show neuroprotective effects of RIC. Investigators prior work has shown that when paired with motor training, RIC enhances motor learning in healthy individuals. Based on these diversified benefits of RIC, the central hypothesis is that the multifactorial mechanisms of RIC can be harnessed as a priming agent to enhance motor learning and augment neuroplasticity in children with UCP. The Specific Aims are: 1) to determine the effects of RIC + training on bimanual skill performance, and 2) to determine the effects of RIC + training on corticospinal excitability in children with UCP. In this triple blind, randomized controlled trial, 30 children with UCP, ages 6-16 years will first undergo bimanual speed stack performance, functional upper extremity, and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation assessments. Children will then undergo RIC/Sham conditioning plus training. Investigators will deliver RIC/sham conditioning via cyclic inflation and deflation of a pressure cuff on the paretic arm using a standard protocol. Training will involve 5 days (15 trials/day) of bimanual speed stack training and intensive bimanual training using hand arm bimanual intensive therapy (HABIT) with a standard dose of 6 hours/day for 5 days. The children will perform the same baseline assessments post-intervention. Investigators hypothesize that compared to sham conditioning + training, RIC + training will significantly enhance: 1) bimanual skill performance (decrease in movement time (sec) to complete bimanual speed stack task), 2) bimanual function (increase in the Assisting Hand Assessment scores), 3) cortical excitability in the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) (larger amplitude of motor evoked potentials and lower resting or active motor thresholds), and 4) reduce motor cortex inhibition (reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition and increase in intracortical facilitation in ipsilesional M1). The long-term goal is to develop effective interventions to improve function of children with UCP. Outcomes of this project will provide critical ingredients for designing Phase II trials that will determine the effects of RIC combined with different dose of intensive behavioral interventions to improve functional outcomes in children with UCP.

Interventions

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. RIC is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

See descriptions under arm/group descriptions. Sham conditioning is delivered for 5 intervention visits. Visits 1 is the pre-training assessment visit, visits 2-6 are RIC plus training visits, visit 7 is a post-training assessment visit.

BEHAVIORALHand Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy (HABIT)

HABIT is a child-friendly, intensive intervention directed at improving bimanual coordination and function of the affected arm. The intervention employed in this study includes various age-appropriate fine and gross motor bimanual activities that will be delivered in a play context. Children practice bimanual activities for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 1 week.

Children practices bimanual cup stacking, 15 trials/day for 5 consecutive day.

BEHAVIORALBalance training

All children undergo training on a balance board, learning to hold the board level with equal weight on each leg and using various bilateral upper extremity strategies. Participants perform the balance task for 15, 30-second trials per day at visits 2-6.

Sponsors

East Carolina University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants are masked to group assignment (RLIC vs. Sham conditioning) and the assessor will be masked to group assignment of the participants.

Intervention model description

Double blinded, randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Children diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy, ages 6-16 years * Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels I-III * Ability to complete a stack of 3 cups in 2 minutes * Mainstream in school and has sufficient cognition to follow the experiment instructions

Exclusion criteria

* Children with other developmental disabilities such as autism, developmental coordination disorders, etc. * Children with absent active motor threshold * Children with cognitive deficits or communication problem * Children with known cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunctions * Children with metabolic disorders, neoplasm, hydrocephalus * Children who are receiving other adjunct therapies such as rTMS and tDCS * Children with seizures and on anti-seizure medications * Children with metal implants and incompatible medical devices for MRI scans

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Assisting Hand AssessmentBaseline and 1 weekAssisting Hand Assessment assesses bimanual coordination and affected hand function. A 5-point change from pre- to post-intervention is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.
Change in Bimanual Task PerformanceBaseline and 1 weekThe time (seconds) to complete each trial of cup stack, which will be averaged across three trials. This will be measured at visit 1 (pre-) and visit 7 (post-intervention). Smaller time to complete the task indicates better performance.
Change in Resting and Active Motor ThresholdsBaseline and 1 weekThe minimum intensity of the stimulator output required to produce an MEP of \> 50 μV will be determined using maximum-likelihood parameter estimation by a sequential testing (ML-PEST) algorithm from the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater reduction in resting and active motor threshold from pre- to post-intervention indicates greater corticospinal excitability.
Change in Stimulus-response curvesBaseline and 1 weekSuprathreshold intensities of 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, and 150% of resting motor threshold will be administered randomly on the lesioned and non-lesioned cortex. Greater motor evoked potential response at each of these intensities indicate greater corticospinal excitability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hand grip and pinch strengthBaseline and 1 weekHand grip and pinch strength assesses hand muscle strength. Greater hand and pinch strength indicates greater strength of hand muscles.
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI)Baseline and 1 weekFor SICI, a subthreshold (80% RMT) conditioning pulse to the motor hotspot will be applied followed by a suprathreshold (120% RMT) test pulse 3 milliseconds later. Reduction in SICI indicates intracortical facilitation.
Change in Box and Blocks Test (BBT)Baseline and 1 weekBBT is a standard test to assess manual speed. Greater number of blocks transferred indicates greater manual speed.
Change in accelerometry derived variablesBaseline and 1 weekNumber of movements, use ratio, magnitude ratio, bilateral magnitude, and acceleration variability will be quantified using wrist worn accelerometers. Greater values indicate better bimanual performance.
Change in Intracortical Facilitation (ICF)Baseline and 1 weekFor ICF, the interstimulus interval will increase to 12 milliseconds. Greater ICF indicates greater intracortical facilitation.
Change in Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)Baseline and 1 weekNHPT is a standard test to assess manual speed and dexterity. Smaller time to complete NHPT indicates greater speed and dexterity.
Change in Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT)Baseline and 1 weekJHFT assesses fine and gross hand and arm movements. Smaller time to complete JHFT indicates better hand function.
Change in Balance performanceBaseline and 1 weekThe average amount of time in seconds that a participant maintains the stability platform within ±5° of horizontal position during 15 trials of 30 seconds each. The total score will range between 0-30 seconds. Higher balance score indicates better balance performance. Greater average balance time indicates better balance performance.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026