Skip to content

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Phase 2b Study of Izokibep

A Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Izokibep in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05355805
Enrollment
205
Registered
2022-05-02
Start date
2022-05-05
Completion date
2024-02-21
Last updated
2025-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Keywords

hidradenitis suppurativa, Izokibep

Brief summary

Izokibep is a potent and selective inhibitor of interleukin 17A (IL-17A) that is being developed for treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of izokibep administered subcutaneously (SC) in adult subjects with moderate to severe HS.

Interventions

Biologic: IL-17A inhibitor Form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Subcutaneous (SC)

Form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Subcutaneous (SC)

Sponsors

ACELYRIN Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General * Subject has provided signed informed consent including consenting to comply with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. * 18 years to 75 years of age Type of Subject and Disease Characteristics * Diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) for ≥ 1 year prior to first dose of study drug. * Hidradenitis suppurativa lesions present in ≥ 2 distinct anatomic areas, one of which is Hurley Stage II or III. * A total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of ≥ 5 at screening and Day 1 prior to enrollment/randomization. * Subject must have had an inadequate response to oral antibiotics OR exhibited recurrence after discontinuation to, OR demonstrated intolerance to, OR have a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS. * Must agree to use daily over-the-counter topical antiseptics. * Subject must be willing to complete a daily skin pain diary for at least 3 days prior to Day 1 visit.

Exclusion criteria

Medical Conditions * Draining fistula count of \> 20. * Outpatient surgery ≤ 8 weeks prior or inpatient surgery ≤ 12 weeks prior to enrollment/randomization. * Other active skin disease or condition that could interfere with study assessments. * Chronic pain not associated with HS. * Uncontrolled, clinically significant system disease. * History of demyelinating disease or neurological symptoms suggestive of demyelinating disease. * Malignancy within 5 years. * The subject is at risk of self-harm or harm to others. * Active infection or history of certain infections. * Tuberculosis or fungal infection seen on available chest x-ray taken ≤ 3 months of screening or at screening (Exception: documented evidence of completed treatment and clinically resolved). * Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part A: Number of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12Part A: Baseline to Week 12HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.
Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 16Part B: Baseline to Week 16HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 16Part B: Baseline to Week 16HiSCR90 was defined as at least a 90% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count
Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR100 at Week 16Part B: Baseline to Week 16HiSCR100 was defined as at least a 100% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.
Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR50 at Week 16Part B: Baseline to Week 16HiSCR50 was defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥ 1 Disease Flare Through 16 Weeks of TreatmentPart B: Day 1 through to Week 16A flare was defined as ≥ 25% increase in AN count with a minimum increase of 2 AN relative to baseline. Missing data of abscess and inflammatory nodules counts at scheduled visits are imputed assuming monotone missingness pattern. Predictors in the regression model for missing values at Week 4 are Baseline Hurley stage, baseline abscess count, baseline inflammatory nodule count, baseline draining fistula count, sex, race, age, body mass index (BMI) and prior Biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS. Predictors in the regression model for missing values after Week 4 are all of these variables, plus counts of abscess, inflammatory nodule, and draining fistula at prior scheduled assessment. Missing flare values in both the placebo and izokibep groups are imputed using observed data from the placebo group only.
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Part A: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeksAn adverse event (AE) referred to any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, regardless of a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs included any event occurring after the participant received the study treatment. Clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs. Serious TEAEs (SAEs) were untoward medical occurrences after the first dose, irrespective of a causal link to the study treatment, that led to death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or its prolongation, caused significant disability, resulted in congenital anomalies, or were considered other medically important events.
Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 3-Point Reduction From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its Worst at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 4Part B: Baseline to Week 16The Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain is a NRS that consists of scores from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no skin pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine.
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special InterestPart B: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeksAdverse events of special interest were adverse events in the following categories: candida infection, inflammatory bowel disease, suicidal ideation, malignancies, major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, tuberculosis, infections, cytopenias and hypersensitivity reactions.
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsPart B: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeksAn AE referred to any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, regardless of a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs included any event occurring after the participant received the study treatment. Clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs. SAEs were untoward medical occurrences after the first dose, irrespective of a causal link to the study treatment, that led to death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or its prolongation, caused significant disability, resulted in congenital anomalies, or were considered other medically important events.
Part B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsUp to 39 weeksBlood samples were collected at different time points throughout the study.
Part B: Number of Participants With Hurley Stage II at Baseline Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 2Part B: Week 16The percentage of participants with baseline Hurley Stage II who achieved AN count of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 16. Hurley stages: Stage 1 - solitary or multiple, isolated abscess formation without scarring or sinus tracts Stage 2 - recurrent abscesses, single or multiple widely separated lesions, with sinus tract formation Stage 3 - diffuse or broad involvement, with multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses.
Part A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Baseline, Week 16, Week 32, Week 39Blood samples were collected at different time points throughout the study.

Countries

Canada, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at different centers in the United States, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Spain, and participated from May 2022 to February 2024.

Pre-assignment details

Part A was a single-arm, open-label, proof-of-concept investigation to explore preliminary efficacy and safety of izokibep. Once Part A was fully enrolled, subsequent participants were enrolled into Part B. Part B was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding investigation to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of izokibep in participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QW
Participants with moderate to severe HS received open label izokibep 160 mg by SC injection QW in Part A for up to 31 weeks.
30
Part B Placebo QW/Q2W Then Izokibep QW/Q2W
Participants with moderate to severe HS received placebo by SC injection either QW or Q2W for up to 16 weeks. After Week 16, participants who received placebo QW switched to izokibep QW up to Week 31. Participants who received placebo Q2W switched to izokibep Q2W up to Week 30.
59
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QW
Participants with moderate to severe HS received izokibep 160 mg QW by SC injection for 31 weeks.
57
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2W
Participants with moderate to severe HS received izokibep 160 mg Q2W by SC injection for 30 weeks.
59
Total205

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDecision by Sponsor0010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up611106
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7141513

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPart A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B Placebo QW/Q2W Then Izokibep QW/Q2WPart B Izokibep 160 mg QW
Abcess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count
Part A
10.5 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64
10.5 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64
Abcess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count
Part B
10.4 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.42
9.9 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.85
9.3 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.24
11.9 Total Abcess/Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Abscess Count
Part A
1.7 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18
1.7 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18
Abscess Count
Part B
1.9 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.67
1.9 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.86
1.8 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
1.9 Abcesses
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.57
Age, Categorical
Part A
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Part A
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Part A
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
Part B
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Part B
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Part B
Between 18 and 65 years
172 Participants58 Participants58 Participants56 Participants
Age, Continuous
Part A
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
Age, Continuous
Part B
37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.04
37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.66
Draining Fistula Count
Part A
1.7 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
1.7 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
Draining Fistula Count
Part B
3.1 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.24
2.6 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.38
3.5 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18
3.0 Fistulas
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants26 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants7 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Not Hispanic or Latino
148 Participants52 Participants50 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Inflammatory Nodule Count
Part A
8.8 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
8.8 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Inflammatory Nodule Count
Part B
8.5 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.22
7.9 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.21
7.5 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
10.0 Nodules
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.45
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Black or African American
14 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part A
White
16 Participants16 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Asian
4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Black or African American
22 Participants6 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
More than one race
5 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part B
White
143 Participants51 Participants47 Participants45 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part A
Female
21 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part A
Male
9 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part B
Female
115 Participants36 Participants40 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Part B
Male
60 Participants23 Participants19 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 590 / 570 / 590 / 260 / 240 / 530 / 43
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 3025 / 5943 / 5734 / 5910 / 2614 / 249 / 5313 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 302 / 592 / 571 / 591 / 262 / 240 / 531 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Part A: Number of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 12

HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.

Time frame: Part A: Baseline to Week 12

Population: FAS, Part A: all participants who received at lease one dose of study drug in Part A.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants Who Achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) at Week 1212 Participants
Primary

Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 16

HiSCR75 was defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.

Time frame: Part B: Baseline to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1616 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1621 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR75 at Week 1619 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error was estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR75.p-value: 0.3055Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error was estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR75.p-value: 0.6192Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

Blood samples were collected at different time points throughout the study.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 32, Week 39

Population: ADA Analysis Set: all participants who received at lease one dose of study drug and had both baseline ADA and at least one post-dose ADA measurement in Part A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 3215 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Baseline12 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 1611 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants Testing Positive for Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Week 3917 Participants
Secondary

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) referred to any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, regardless of a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs included any event occurring after the participant received the study treatment. Clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs. Serious TEAEs (SAEs) were untoward medical occurrences after the first dose, irrespective of a causal link to the study treatment, that led to death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or its prolongation, caused significant disability, resulted in congenital anomalies, or were considered other medically important events.

Time frame: Part A: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS): all participants who received at lease one dose of study drug in Part A.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE26 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart A: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAE2 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAs

Blood samples were collected at different time points throughout the study.

Time frame: Up to 39 weeks

Population: ADA Analysis Set: all participants who received at lease one dose of study drug and had both baseline ADA and at least one post-dose ADA measurement in Part B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsBaseline27 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 1621 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3213 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3917 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3932 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsBaseline29 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3235 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 1629 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3915 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 1639 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsWeek 3212 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Testing Positive for ADAsBaseline36 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 3-Point Reduction From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its Worst at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 4

The Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain is a NRS that consists of scores from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no skin pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Part B: Baseline to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B who had a baseline NRS ≥ 4.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 3-Point Reduction From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its Worst at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 44 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 3-Point Reduction From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its Worst at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 45 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 3-Point Reduction From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in Patient Global Assessment of Skin Pain at Its Worst at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline NRS ≥ 49 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.p-value: 0.4031Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.p-value: 0.0327Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR100 at Week 16

HiSCR100 was defined as at least a 100% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count.

Time frame: Part B: Baseline to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR100 at Week 167 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR100 at Week 1615 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR100 at Week 1611 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR100.p-value: 0.0514Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR100.p-value: 0.3322Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR50 at Week 16

HiSCR50 was defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count

Time frame: Part B: Baseline to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR50 at Week 1622 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR50 at Week 1626 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR50 at Week 1626 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR50.p-value: 0.3258Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR50.p-value: 0.4068Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 16

HiSCR90 was defined as at least a 90% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule count, with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining fistula count

Time frame: Part B: Baseline to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 169 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 1615 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants Who Achieved HiSCR90 at Week 1612 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR90.p-value: 0.1606Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Non-response imputation was used for participants with missing HiSCR90.p-value: 0.5116Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants With Hurley Stage II at Baseline Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 2

The percentage of participants with baseline Hurley Stage II who achieved AN count of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 16. Hurley stages: Stage 1 - solitary or multiple, isolated abscess formation without scarring or sinus tracts Stage 2 - recurrent abscesses, single or multiple widely separated lesions, with sinus tract formation Stage 3 - diffuse or broad involvement, with multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses.

Time frame: Part B: Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B, inclusive only of participants with Hurley Stage II at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With Hurley Stage II at Baseline Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 215 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With Hurley Stage II at Baseline Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 218 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants With Hurley Stage II at Baseline Who Achieved AN Count of 0, 1, or 214 Participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.p-value: 0.5422Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.p-value: 0.6569Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs

An AE referred to any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, regardless of a causal relationship with the study treatment. TEAEs included any event occurring after the participant received the study treatment. Clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests recorded after treatment administration were documented as TEAEs. SAEs were untoward medical occurrences after the first dose, irrespective of a causal link to the study treatment, that led to death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or its prolongation, caused significant disability, resulted in congenital anomalies, or were considered other medically important events.

Time frame: Part B: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeks

Population: SAS: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug in Part B.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE40 Participants
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE2 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE49 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE2 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE48 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE17 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE2 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE16 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE27 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE1 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsAny TEAE25 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEsSerious TEAE0 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest

Adverse events of special interest were adverse events in the following categories: candida infection, inflammatory bowel disease, suicidal ideation, malignancies, major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, tuberculosis, infections, cytopenias and hypersensitivity reactions.

Time frame: Part B: Screening (Day -28) to Follow-up (Week 45), for a total of 49 weeks

Population: SAS: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest4 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest2 Participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest1 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest1 Participants
Part B Placebo/Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest2 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg QW (Week 16 to 31)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest0 Participants
Part B: Izokibep 160 mg Q2W (Week 16 to 30)Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest2 Participants
Secondary

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥ 1 Disease Flare Through 16 Weeks of Treatment

A flare was defined as ≥ 25% increase in AN count with a minimum increase of 2 AN relative to baseline. Missing data of abscess and inflammatory nodules counts at scheduled visits are imputed assuming monotone missingness pattern. Predictors in the regression model for missing values at Week 4 are Baseline Hurley stage, baseline abscess count, baseline inflammatory nodule count, baseline draining fistula count, sex, race, age, body mass index (BMI) and prior Biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS. Predictors in the regression model for missing values after Week 4 are all of these variables, plus counts of abscess, inflammatory nodule, and draining fistula at prior scheduled assessment. Missing flare values in both the placebo and izokibep groups are imputed using observed data from the placebo group only.

Time frame: Part B: Day 1 through to Week 16

Population: FAS, Part B: all participants randomized in Part B.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥ 1 Disease Flare Through 16 Weeks of Treatment22.32 Percentage of participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg QWPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥ 1 Disease Flare Through 16 Weeks of Treatment18.29 Percentage of participants
Part B Izokibep 160 mg Q2WPart B: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced ≥ 1 Disease Flare Through 16 Weeks of Treatment14.93 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg QW arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Missing data of abscess and inflammatory nodules counts at scheduled visits are imputed assuming monotone missingness pattern.p-value: 0.3329Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The common risk difference between placebo QW/Q2W and the izokibep 160 mg Q2W arm among the four strata, prior biologic/JAK inhibitor use for HS (Yes/No) and Hurley Stage (II or III), used for randomization and associated standard error will be estimated by combining the observed risk differences using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting.~Missing data of abscess and inflammatory nodules counts at scheduled visits are imputed assuming monotone missingness pattern.p-value: 0.5882Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026