Skip to content

Automated Robotic Maneuvering System (RMS) vs Manual Reposition Maneuver in Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy of Automated Robotic Maneuvering System (RMS) Reposition Chair Versus Traditional Manual Repositioning Maneuvers in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05352555
Enrollment
75
Registered
2022-04-29
Start date
2022-02-15
Completion date
2022-04-23
Last updated
2022-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Keywords

Automated, Robotic, Vertigo, Epley maneuver, RMS chair, Reposition chair, Dizziness, Vestibular diseases, Multi canal BPPV

Brief summary

Comparison of treatment efficacy of an automated robotic maneuvering system (RMS) repositioning chair versus manual positioning maneuvers in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

Detailed description

The standard treatments for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV) are manual positioning maneuvers. This method, beyond being costly and requiring extensive training, is a significant burden on healthcare resources. We developed an automated robotic maneuvering system, hereby known as RMS, to tackle this problem. Our Clinical Investigation is two-fold; (1) test the safety of RMS and, (2) understand the viability of RMS for treating BPPV when compared to manual positioning maneuvers.

Interventions

DEVICEAutomated vertigo repositioning chair

Patients are strapped to the chair with a safety harness, and video fenzel goggle are worn. Automated diagnostic procedures are performed to determine vertigo subtype and orientation (Left/Right) (described below). 1. Dix-Hallpike (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Supine roll (for horizontal canal involvement) 3. (Optional) Deep Head Hanging (for anterior canal involvement) If nystagmus is detected during automated diagnostic maneuvers, BPPV subtype is diagnosed, and corresponding automated treatment maneuver will be performed (described below). 1. Epley's and/or Semont's maneuver (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Barbecue and/or Gufoni's maneuver (for horizontal canal involvement) 3. Yacovino's maneuver (for anterior canal involvement) 10 minutes after performing automated treatment maneuver, provocative diagnostic test maneuver was performed once again to ensure successful intervention. A follow-up was done one week later at the earliest.

OTHERCanalith Reposition Maneuver

Patients were seated on a examination table and given videonystagmography goggles (VNG). Manual diagnostic procedures are performed to determine vertigo subtype and orientation. The manual diagnostic procedures for Left and Right sided semicircular canals are: 1. Dix-Hallpike (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Supine roll and Bow and Lean (for horizontal canal involvement) If nystagmus is detected during diagnostic maneuvers, BPPV subtype is diagnosed, and corresponding treatment maneuvers will be performed manually. The automated treatment maneuvers are: 1. Epley's maneuver (for posterior canal involvement) 2. Barbecue and/or Gufoni's maneuver (for horizontal canal involvement) Patients were called back for a follow up 2 days after performing manual treatment maneuvers. Provocative diagnostic testing maneuvers were performed again to ensure successful intervention. A second follow-up was done one week later at the earliest.

Sponsors

Haseki Sultangazi Teaching and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Stratejik Yenilikci Girisimler Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Every enrolled patients records were randomized, and based on the outcome, subjects were either assigned to control or experimental arm groups. A report detailing the outcome, but omitting the method of treatment, was given to patients and their care provider.

Intervention model description

Patients previously diagnosed with BPPV were referred to vestibular laboratory at the Department of Otolaryngology at Haseki Sultangazi Teaching and Research Hospital. Videonystagmography was performed on all subjects to confirm the BPPV diagnosis. Patients were then randomly divided into two groups; experimental and control. The experimental group was treated with RMS, while control group was treated with traditional manual canalith repositioning maneuvers on an examination table.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Characteristic positional nystagmus (for BPPV) * Positive Dix-Hallpike * Positive supine roll test * Positive Deep Head Hanging * Vertigo-Dizziness Imbalance symptom scores compatible with BPPV

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients * Patients who have taken vertigo suppressing agents (Dimenhydrinate) in the last 48 hours * Patients taller than 200 cm (2.0 m) * Patients who have had a cardiovascular or neurosurgical operation in the last month * Patients with retinal detachment and/or glaucoma * Lack of treatment cooperation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Treatments1 month (30 days)Number of treatment necessary to achieve resolution of vertigo and nystagmus
Treatment successAfter treatment: 1 week - 1 month (30 days)Number of subjects achieving resolution of vertigo and nystagmus after one treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vertigo-Dizziness Imbalance (VDI) questionnaire1 month (30 days)Comparison of pre-treatment and post-treatment score based on symptoms and quality of life
Adverse events1 month (30 days)Registration of adverse events and safety issues related to RMS.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026