Skip to content

Stigma and a Shared Decision Aid

Piloting a Shared Decision-Making Aid for Reducing Stigma in Drug Use and HIV Harm Reduction in a Rural Setting

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05352412
Enrollment
62
Registered
2022-04-28
Start date
2022-04-07
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Opioid Use Disorder

Keywords

Stigma, Decision Aid

Brief summary

A major barrier for the uptake of evidence-based interventions to address the ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, especially in rural regions, is stigma, which occurs at many levels, including that of the patient and provider. A shared decision making aid is an evidence-based method for increasing engagement and knowledge of both patients and providers, potentially democratizing treatment decisions, especially in stigmatized conditions. The investigators propose to adapt and pilot a decision aid for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and harm reduction in two hospitals in rural Missouri to evaluate whether this reduces stigma in both patients and providers.

Detailed description

In the past decade, the US opioid crisis has emerged as a leading cause of death among adults. It has also led to an increase in invasive bacterial and fungal infections; and HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreaks in multiple regions. Rural communities have had an especially disproportionate burden from the impact of opioid use disorder (OUD). Treatment of OUD with pharmacotherapy is one of the most effective strategies for reducing OUD-related mortality and morbidity. But while there has been increasing will for expanding pharmacotherapy, stigma - from community, providers and patients-remains a significant barrier to uptake pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The approach to substance use has historically favored abstinence strategies that are often without evidence, influenced by punitive, stigmatizing framework. This stigma may be even more prevalent in rural communities. To date there have been very few effective interventions to address inter- and intrapersonal stigma, and none with sustained effectiveness. The investigators propose adapting and piloting a shared decision-making aid for patients presenting to the emergency department or are being admitted at two hospitals in rural Missouri, where there is a high prevalence of OUD and its complications. The decision-aid is an evidence-based intervention show to increase knowledge, engagement and decision-making concordant with patient values in a variety of medical conditions. It is feasible that by democratizing treatment and standardizing decision-making counseling, the decision aid can mediate attitudes and reduce stigma. The investigators hypothesize by delivering standardized, high-quality knowledge to both provider and patient, that stigma can be reduced in both parties. In Aim 1 the investigators will adapt an existing decision aid for OUD treatment to the specific context of rural hospital care. This decision aid will be a part of an existing bundled care program for OUD and related infections that the investigators have implemented in these hospitals. In Aim 2 the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot comparing the decision aid intervention with counseling as usual without decision aid to assess feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness for reducing stigma in substance use, HIV, OUD pharmacotherapy and harm reduction. The investigators will measure these around the time of the intervention and in longitudinal follow up. The findings could potentially identify a novel intervention and methodology for treatment expansion and stigma reduction that has not been previously explored, especially in the rural context, where need is high. Following the successful completion of this pilot trial, the investigators will develop an expanded multi-site comparative effectiveness trial of the decision aid, implementation studies, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShared Decision Making Aid - Patients

Patients will be randomized to the shared decision making aid intervention.

BEHAVIORALShared Decision Making Aid - Providers

Providers of patients randomized o the shared decision making aid intervention.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
Washington University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients from a rural community currently admitted or recently admitted to Barnes-Jewish Hospital * Admission must be for an infection associated with intravenous drug use * Patient must be willing to speak with healthcare provider about medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) * patient must be over 18 years old * must be able to complete electronic survey written in English

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project3 monthsSum of 6 5-point Likert scale questions that determines self-reported stigma on taking MOUDs. This was compromised of 6 separate questions with a scale of 1-5 with 1 having the lowest stigma and 5 having the highest stigma. The range is thus 6 - 30.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction With Clarity of Shared Decision AidImmediate post-baseline surveyLikert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst. There is no statistical analysis for this secondary outcome as patients who did not receive the decision aid cannot provide satisfaction regarding clarity of shared decision aid.
Patient Satisfaction With Helpfulness of Shared Decision AidImmediate post-baseline surveyLikert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst
Overall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision AidImmediate post-baseline surveyI like the decision aid, The decision aid is appealing, The decision aid is easy to use, and The decision aid is doable. The scale range is 1 to 2 with a score of 1 being a better outcome.
Patient Anticipated MOUD Stigma3 monthsThis 5-point Likert scale was compromised of 7 questions of a range of 7-35. The lower score denotes the lower stigma and the higher score denotes the higher stigma.
Hospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate5-point Likert scale where score of 1 least stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder and 5 is the highest stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.
Provider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate post-interventionA 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.
Provider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use OrderImmediateA 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.
Provider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediately post-intervention5-point Likert scale where score of 1 is the most stigma and 5 is the least stigma. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Baseline Counseling As Usual - Patient
Patients randomized to the baseline counseling from their healthcare provider regarding medications for opioid use disorder.
23
Shared Decision Making Aid - Patient
Patients randomized to the decision aid arm will receive all of the above as well as a shared decision making aid. This will be a 10-minute survey that takes into account their priorities and preferences around medications for opioid use disorder.
23
Baseline Counseling As Usual - Provider
Providers of patients randomized to the baseline counseling as usual arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.
7
Shared Decision Making Aid - Provider
Providers of patients randomized to the decision aid arm will will be asked to participate in a survey to assess their stigma in regards to taking care of patients with opioid use disorder.
9
Total62

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicShared Decision Making Aid - PatientBaseline Counseling As Usual - ProviderShared Decision Making Aid - ProviderBaseline Counseling As Usual - PatientTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants7 Participants9 Participants23 Participants62 Participants
Age, Continuous35 years34 years38 years35 years35 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants4 Participants6 Participants22 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 Participants7 Participants9 Participants23 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants0 Participants3 Participants10 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 231 / 230 / 70 / 9
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 230 / 70 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 232 / 230 / 70 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project

Sum of 6 5-point Likert scale questions that determines self-reported stigma on taking MOUDs. This was compromised of 6 separate questions with a scale of 1-5 with 1 having the lowest stigma and 5 having the highest stigma. The range is thus 6 - 30.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Number of participants recruited and enrolled

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the ProjectBaseline15 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the ProjectImmediate follow-up14 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project2 week post-discharge8 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project90 days post-discharge8 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project90 days post-discharge9 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the ProjectBaseline11 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the Project2 week post-discharge7 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Internalized Stigma Towards Medicaid for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) Over the Course of the ProjectImmediate follow-up8 score on a scale
p-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline survey compared with immediate follow-up surveyp-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2 weeks post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.21Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90 days post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.19Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline survey versus immediate follow-upp-value: 0.38Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2 weeks post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.25Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90 days post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.07Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-up between the two armsp-value: 0.03Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2 weeks post-discharge comparison between the 2 armsp-value: 0.65Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90-days post discharge compared between the 2 armsp-value: 0.97Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Hospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

5-point Likert scale where score of 1 least stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder and 5 is the highest stigma towards patients with opioid use disorder. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.

Time frame: Immediate

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientHospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline8 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientHospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization7 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientHospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline7 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientHospital Policy Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization7 score on a scale
p-value: 0.48Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.17Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-upp-value: 0.42Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Overall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision Aid

I like the decision aid, The decision aid is appealing, The decision aid is easy to use, and The decision aid is doable. The scale range is 1 to 2 with a score of 1 being a better outcome.

Time frame: Immediate post-baseline survey

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientOverall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision AidI like the decision aid1.06 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientOverall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision AidThe decision aid is appealing1.06 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientOverall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision AidThe decision aid is easy to use1.06 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientOverall Patient Satisfaction With the Shared Decision AidThe decision aid is doable1 score on a scale
Secondary

Patient Anticipated MOUD Stigma

This 5-point Likert scale was compromised of 7 questions of a range of 7-35. The lower score denotes the lower stigma and the higher score denotes the higher stigma.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze anticipated MOUD stigma.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD StigmaImmediate follow-up19 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD StigmaBaseline20 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD Stigma2 weeks post-discharge18 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD Stigma90 days post-discharge11 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD Stigma90 days post-discharge14 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD StigmaBaseline21 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD StigmaImmediate follow-up17 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientPatient Anticipated MOUD Stigma2 weeks post-discharge13 score on a scale
Comparison: Baseline comparison between the 2 armsp-value: 0.77Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-up compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.85Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2-week post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.38Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90-day post discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.21Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-up compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2 week post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.09Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90-day post-discharge compared with baseline surveyp-value: 0.07Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 2 weeks post-discharge compared between the 2 armsp-value: 0.26Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-up compared between the 2 armsp-value: 0.69Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: 90-day post-discharge compared between the 2 armsp-value: 0.32Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Clarity of Shared Decision Aid

Likert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst. There is no statistical analysis for this secondary outcome as patients who did not receive the decision aid cannot provide satisfaction regarding clarity of shared decision aid.

Time frame: Immediate post-baseline survey

Population: Mann-Whitney U

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Satisfaction With Clarity of Shared Decision Aid1.33 score on a scale
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With Helpfulness of Shared Decision Aid

Likert scale from 1-4 with 1 being the best and 4 being the worst

Time frame: Immediate post-baseline survey

Population: Mann-Whitney U

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientPatient Satisfaction With Helpfulness of Shared Decision Aid1.44 score on a scale
Secondary

Provider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

A 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.

Time frame: Immediate post-intervention

Population: Healthcare providers who care of patients with opioid use disorder

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline17 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization18 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline17 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Comfort Treating Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization18 score on a scale
Comparison: Baselinep-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline versus immediate follow-upp-value: 0.11Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline versus immediate follow-upp-value: 0.89Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-upp-value: 0.55Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Provider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use Order

A 6 question 5-point Likert scale with a scale of 1= least stigma and 5=most stigma. A total of 6 questions were asked. Thus the range is 6 - 30.

Time frame: Immediate

Population: Healthcare providers who treat patients with opioid use disorder

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use OrderBaseline14 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use OrderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization14 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use OrderBaseline14 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Stigma Towards Patients With Opioid Use OrderImmediate follow-up post patient randomization13 score on a scale
Comparison: Baselinep-value: 0.66Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline versus immediate follow-up post randomizationp-value: 0.2Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Baseline versus immediate follow-up post randomizationp-value: 0.85Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-up post randomizationp-value: 0.07Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Provider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

5-point Likert scale where score of 1 is the most stigma and 5 is the least stigma. The overall number is a sum of 4 questions with a theoretical range of 4 - 20.

Time frame: Immediately post-intervention

Population: Healthcare providers taking care of patients with Opioid Use Disorder

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline20 score on a scale
Baseline Counseling As Usual - PatientProvider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post randomization of patient20 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use DisorderBaseline20 score on a scale
Shared Decision Making Aid - PatientProvider Willingness To Work With Patients With Opioid Use DisorderImmediate follow-up post randomization of patient20 score on a scale
p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.12Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Immediate follow-upp-value: 0.12Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026