Skip to content

STOPS Trial: Total vs Subtotal Colectomy for Slow Transit Constipation

STOPS Trial: A Multicentre Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Total Colectomy With Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Subtotal Colectomy With Cecal-rectal Anastomosis for Slow Transit Constipation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05352074
Enrollment
252
Registered
2022-04-28
Start date
2022-03-27
Completion date
2028-05-01
Last updated
2026-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Slow Transit Constipation, Surgery

Keywords

Slow Transit Constipation, Total Colectomy with Ileorectal Anastomosis, Subtotal Colectomy with Caecorectal Anastomosis, Defecation Function, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief summary

Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is a traditional surgical option for slow transit constipation (STC). Subtotal colectomy with caecorectal anastomosis have been reported to be a potential alternative approach. Thus, the optimal surgical option for STC is controversial.

Detailed description

Constipation, a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder, affects 10%-15% of adults in the United States and approximately 8.2% of China's general population. Slow transit constipation (STC), accounting for 15%-42% of constipation cases, is characterized by impaired colonic motility. For patients refractory to conservative therapies who experience chronic, intractable symptoms and diminished quality of life (QoL), surgical intervention becomes the last-resort treatment. The primary surgical approach for STC has historically been total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA). Over the past two decades, however, subtotal colectomy with cecorectal anastomosis (SC-CRA) has garnered growing interest within the surgical community due to its potential to mitigate postoperative diarrhea. Despite this benefit, SC-CRA raises concerns about an elevated risk of recurrent constipation. The debate regarding the superiority of these approaches remains unresolved. This study aims to address this controversy through a comparative analysis of TC-IRA and SC-CRA, evaluating their therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles in refractory STC.

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis

Following complete colonic mobilization without preservation of the ileocolic vascular pedicle, the surgical specimen was extracted by extending the right lower quadrant trocar incision to approximately 4-5 cm. A resection of ileum, 2-3 cm proximal to the ileocecal junction, will be conducted by stapler. The anvil of a 29-mm circular stapler was inserted into the proximal ileal lumen and repositioned intra-abdominally. Ileorectal anastomosis was performed by transanal insertion of the circular stapler, aiming to achieve a tension-free, contamination-minimized reconstruction. Finally, a closed suction drain was placed in the rectouterine pouch (Douglas pouch), and all abdominal incisions were closed in layers.

PROCEDURESubtotal colectomy with cecal-rectal anastomosis

Following complete colonic mobilization with preservation of the ileocolic vascular pedicle and its branches, the surgical specimen was extracted by extending the right lower quadrant trocar incision to 4-5 cm. After insertion of the anvil from a 29-mm circular stapler through the ascending colon resection margin, a resection about 3 cm distal to the ileocecal junction will be conducted. The cecum was then positioned in the pelvis without rotational torsion, and an antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis was created between cecal fundus (after appendectomy) and the rectal stump. The anastomosis was performed via transanal insertion of the circular stapler to ensure tension-free, contamination-controlled reconstruction. Finally, a closed suction drain was placed in the rectouterine pouch (Douglas pouch), and all abdominal incisions were closed in a layered fashion.

Sponsors

Third Military Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients (≥18 years of age) of either sex 2. Patients with conditions in agreement with the Roman IV criteria of functional constipation 3. Patients have less than one complete spontaneous bowel movement per week 4. Patients rely on laxatives to assist defecation for a long time 5. More than 20% the radio-paque markers localized in the colon after 72 hours based on colonic transit studies 6. Patients were refractory to conservative treatment for more than 1 year 7. Patients with a strong desire for surgery

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 2. Patients with megacolon, megarectum,severe spastic constipation, severe rectocele, rectal prolapse (Oxford Grade IV or above) 3. Patients with colorectal neoplasms 4. Patients with small intestinal slow transit 5. Patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome 6. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease 7. Patients with ileostomy 8. Patients with severe psychiatric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wexner Constipation ScoreFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe Wexner Constipation Score will be recorded in terms of scores. Questions examine constipation in its clinical expressions. Each question is answered on a scale of 0 to 4. The scale ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gastrointestinal Quality of Life IndexFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryGastrointestinal Quality of Life Index will be recorded in terms of scores. There are The four possible answers to every question, scored from 0 points (worst) to 4 points (best). The final sum ranges from 0(worst) to 144(best).
36-item short-form health surveyFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThere are eight spheres in the SF-36 survey, including physical function, role physical, role emotional, physical pain, vitality, mental health, social function and general health. Results of each sphere will be recorded in terms of scores. Once the questionnaire was applied to the patients, a summary calculation and a linear transformation were performed to obtain a score within a scale from 0(worst) to 100(best).
The incidence of complicationsFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryPostoperative complications includes short-term and long-term complications, such as ileus, anastomotic leak, small intestinal obstruction, constipation recurrence and so on. Number of Participants with complications will be recorded.
The number of bowel movements per weekFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe number of bowel movements will be recorded in terms of times per week.
Wexner's incontinence scoreFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe Wexner's incontinence score will be recorded in terms of scores. the sacles have 5 items to quantify incontinence grade and frequency and its effect on ordinary life. Each question is answered on a scale of 0 to 4, the global score ranging from 0 (best) to 20 (worst).
The incidence of abdominal painFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of abdominal pain will be recorded in terms of percent. no special measurement is needed.
The incidence of bloatingFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of bloating will be recorded in terms of percent
The incidence of diarrheaFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of diarrhea will be recorded in terms of percent.
The incidence of strainingFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of straining will be recorded in terms of percent.
The incidence of laxative useFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of laxative use will be recorded in terms of percent.
The incidence of enema useFrom the pre-operation to 36 months following surgeryThe incidence of enema use use will be recorded in terms of percent.
Intraoperative measuresPerioperative periodOperation time (minutes), blood loss (mL), complications (classified according to Clavien-Dindo) for both study groups.

Countries

China

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORWeidong Tong, MD

Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 15, 2026