Skip to content

Implementation of the MAINTAIN Instrument for Patients With Dysfunctional Spinal Pain

C-prior: Implementation of the MAINTAIN Instrument for Patients With Dysfunctional Spinal Pain - a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05350254
Enrollment
220
Registered
2022-04-28
Start date
2023-11-20
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2023-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Recurrent, Neck Pain

Brief summary

Previous studies showed that some back pain patients (with specific characteristics) present less days with pain when treated with chiropractic maintenance care. A clinical instrument (called MAINTAIN instrument) was developed to identify those patients who would benefit from chiropractic maintenance care. This study will investigate the impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. This study will help to improve clinical care of patients with back and neck pain by providing them with more individualized care.

Detailed description

Rationale: Non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the largest societal economic burdens with a 80-85% lifetime prevalence worldwide, often characterized by recurrent episodes. Chiropractic maintenance care (MC) is a management strategy aimed at preventing LBP episodes and deterioration by treating patients at pre-planned intervals, regardless of symptoms. It consists of manual therapy, individual exercises and lifestyle advice, and patients are selected based on their previous history of pain and the effectiveness of the initial care plan. A pragmatic randomized clinical trial showed that patients receiving MC had 12.8 fewer days with bothersome LBP compared to a control group. More specifically, patients in the Dysfunctional sub-group, categorized by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) instrument, reported fewer days with pain when receiving MC, suggesting MC's superior effectiveness in this subgroup of patients. The MPI instrument, however, is not suited for daily clinical practice use, prompting the development of the more practical MAINTAIN instrument. It captures 5 dimensions of the pain experience yielding 3 categories of patients: not a candidate for MC, good candidate for MC (sensitivity: 95.8%; specificity: 64.3%) and very good candidate for MC (sensitivity: 81.1%; specificity: 79.2%). Despite these encouraging preliminary results, the usability and impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice remains unknown and a thorough investigation on its implementation is fundamental. Purpose: The overall goal of this multicenter randomized clinical trial is to investigate the process and outcomes of implementing the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. The specific aims are to: 1) assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified MC using the MAINTAIN instrument compared to standard chiropractic care; and 2) assess the fidelity and procedure compliance of implementing the MAINTAIN instrument. Analysis Plan: An intention to treat protocol will be used and estimates will be reported with arithmetic means and 95% confidence intervals. Analysis of the primary outcome (number of days with activity limiting pain) will be conducted as it was in Eklund et al. (2018, 2019). The total number of days with activity limiting pain will be modelled using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) linear regression, using appropriate correlation structure and robust variance estimator. Terms for study arm, time and study arm by time interaction will be included. A term for MC candidate (Yes or No) will be added to this model to further investigate the stratification and its relationship to outcomes. The RE-AIM framework will be used to assess the impact and implementation of the MAINTAIN instrument.

Interventions

Manual Therapy, individual exercises and lifestyle advice

OTHERStandard chiropractic care

Standard care based on clinician's judgement

Sponsors

Parker University
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
McMaster University
CollaboratorOTHER
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with spinal pain (neck, mid-back, and/or low back) of recurrent (not the first episode) and significant (more than 30 days in the past 12 months) character * No pain episode in the past 3 months * Access to a mobile phone and email. * Ability to send and receive SMS (text messages).

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Serious pathology (e.g., acute trauma, cancer, infection, cauda equina, osteoporosis, vertebral fractures) * Contraindications to manual therapy * Specific spinal conditions (e.g., radiculopathy, spinal stenosis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of days with activity-limiting pain12-monthsNumber of days with activity-limiting pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of missed working days12-monthsNumber of missed working days due to pain
Loss of work productivity12-months11-point numeric rating scale, where 0 = did not affect my work and 10 = completely prevented me from working
Pain intensity12-months11-point visual analogue scale, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst imaginable pain

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactMartha Funabashi, PhD
mfunabashi@cmcc.ca647 805 2024

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026