Skip to content

Telerehabilitation-Based Action Observation Treatment in Children with Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Telerehabilitation-Based Action Observation Treatment in Children with Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05349136
Enrollment
36
Registered
2022-04-27
Start date
2022-11-09
Completion date
2024-09-17
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy, Hemiparesis, Telerehabilitation, Action Observation Treatment

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of action observation therapy applied using two different telerehabilitation techniques (synchronous and asynchronous) to children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Detailed description

Action observation treatment (AOT) is a new rehabilitation technique. AOT involves the observation of purposeful actions, presented through a video-clip or performed by an operator, in order to imitate and then perform them. In this study, AOT will be applied by observing actions to be presented via video-clips. 36 children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy who meet the inclusion criteria and agree to participate in the study will be included. The participants will be randomly divided into three groups. The groups are: a) the synchronous telerehabilitation group, where AOT will be applied under the supervision of a physiotherapist via videoconferencing; b) the asynchronous telerehabilitation group, where AOT will be applied under parental supervision; and c) control group. Both the synchronous telerehabilitation group and the asynchronous telerehabilitation group will receive AOT 5 days a week for 3 weeks, for a total of 15 sessions, in addition to conventional physiotherapy. The control group will only receive conventional physiotherapy. A total of three evaluations will be made at baseline (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and at two months of follow-up (T2).

Interventions

This group will receive Action Observation Treatment with a synchronous telerehabilitation method. Children in this group will be applied Action Observation Treatment 5 days a week for 3 weeks, for a total of 15 sessions under the supervision of a physiotherapist via videoconferencing.

This group will receive Action Observation Treatment with an asynchronous telerehabilitation method. Children in this group will be applied Action Observation Treatment 5 days a week for 3 weeks, for a total of 15 sessions under parental supervision.

Sponsors

Marmara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of confirmed hemiparetic cerebral palsy * Manual Ability Classification System ≤ 3 * Age between 6 and 12 * Absence of major visual and/or auditory deficits * Sufficient cooperation to comprehend and complete the test procedure and participate in treatment * House Functional Classification Score ≥4 * Grade ≤2 on the Modified Ashworth Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Seizures uncontrolled by therapy * Surgery and/or botulinum toxin-A injections in the upper limb within 6 months prior to the baseline assessment * Having a disabling behavioral disorder to treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Assisting Hand AssessmentBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's the assisting hand use in activities requiring bimanual use will be evaluated with the Assisting Hand Assessment. The game, which can be performed in a time frame of 10-15 minutes, will be recorded. Then the video will be watched. Twenty-two components regarding general use, arm use, grasp and release, fine motor adjustment, coordination, and pace of the performance will be scored on a four-point scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Minnesota Manual Dexterity TestBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's manual dexterity required to turn and/or place disks with one or both hands will be assessed with the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test. The completion time of the tasks will be recorded.
Changes in Children's Hand-use Experience QuestionnaireBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's use of assisting hands in various bimanual activities will be assessed with the Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire. This questionnaire will be completed by their parents.
Changes in ABILHAND-kidsBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's ease or difficulty in performing bimanual activities will be assessed with the ABILHAND-kids, which is a parent questionnaire.
Changes in Box and Blocks TestBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's unilateral gross manual dexterity will be evaluated with the Box and Blocks Test, which is a timed test. First, the dominant hand will be asked to place the blocks from one side of the box to the other in 1 minute. The number of blocks placed on the other side of the box is recorded. Then it will be repeated with the other hand. The test can be completed in less than 10 minutes.
Changes in Trunk Impairment ScaleBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination will be assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale. The total score is between 0-23. A higher score indicates better performance.
Treatment Satisfaction Assessed by the Visual Analog ScaleT1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period)The children and their parents' treatment satisfaction will be assessed separately with the visual analog scale. The value is between 0-10. A higher value indicates better satisfaction.
Changes in Participation and Environment Measure - Children and YouthBaseline (T0, 1 week before beginning of the study); T1 (within 1 week after the end of the treatment/control period); T2 (8 weeks after the end of the treatment/control period)The children's participation in the home, at school, and in the community will be assessed with the Participation and Environment Measure-Children and Youth, which is a parent questionnaire.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026