Skip to content

OsteoPreP: Food Supplements for Postmenopausal Bone Health

OsteoPreP: The Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Bone, Muscle, and Glucose Metabolism in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomised Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05348694
Acronym
OsteoPreP
Enrollment
160
Registered
2022-04-27
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2024-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Cognitive Decline, Age-Related Sarcopenia, Bone Loss, Age Related, Glucose Metabolism Disorders, Postmenopausal Osteopenia

Keywords

Postmenopausal bone loss, Probiotics, Volumetric bone mineral density, Short-chain fatty acids

Brief summary

To evaluate the effect of 12 months of supplementation with a probiotic (probiotic plus prebiotic; 2 capsules per day) on relative change (%) in total volumetric bone density (measured using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography \[HR-pQCT\]) of the distal tibia.

Detailed description

It is well established that bone loss occurs throughout life after the attainment of peak bone mass which is usually reached by the end of the second decade of life. During the first 5-8 years following menopause, women experience an accelerated bone loss, which is then followed by a slower phase of decline in bone mineral density (BMD). As over 40% of all women in Australia will suffer an osteoporotic (fragility) fracture in their lifetime, investigating interventions that can prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women is a critical focus. The menopausal transition is also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cognitive decline. These conditions and their treatments can also affect bone health. Previous research has indicated a potential link between the gut microbiome and bone health. Animal studies indicate that interventions affecting the gut microbiome may be successful in reducing bone loss, but human data is limited. Moreover, there is an emerging body of evidence linking the gut microbiome to cognitive, muscle and cardiometabolic function. Such studies indicate that probiotics (healthy gut bacteria) or prebiotics (food for healthy bacteria, e.g. fibre) can increase the amount of short chain fatty acids - such as butyrate -produced by the bacteria in the gut which may mediate the beneficial effects of improving gut health. The proposed study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial, which will investigate whether consuming a probiotic supplement containing inulin (a prebiotic soluble fibre) twice daily for 12 months will improve bone health in postmenopausal women. In addition, secondary outcomes will measure the effect of the intervention on immune system modulation and cognition as well as musculoskeletal and metabolic function as potential mediators. One hundred and sixty postmenopausal women residing in Melbourne (Victoria, Australia) who are at least one year from their final menses will be recruited from the community via a mail out, advertisements in newspapers, social media, flyers as well as a landing page on an ACU managed website. The investigators have also applied for assisted mail outs through Services Australia for recruitment purposes. Services Australia is able to extract names and addresses of some target study demographics (females living in Melbourne aged between 40 and 65) from the Medicare database and mail them the study details on our behalf. Those wishing to participate will undergo a series of baseline assessments inclusive of bone mineral density scans, blood and stool sampling and physical activity and lifestyle questionnaires. They will then be randomised, in a blinded fashion, to consume one of the following two supplements: * Placebo control group (n = 80): Placebo capsule - 2 capsules per day * Probiotics group (n=80): Probiotic capsule - 2 capsules per day Study outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. In addition, participants will be contacted via the telephone and email at three-month and nine-month timepoints to report any adverse responses to the supplementation. At the 12-month time point, participants will cease supplementation and immediately (within 24 hours) attend a post intervention assessment and will complete identical assessment measures to those they did at baseline. Finally, at 2 weeks post supplementation cessation participants will be asked to attend an appointment to provide a final stool sample. If it can be confirmed that long term consumption of a probiotic supplement can have beneficial effects on bone health, muscle health, and metabolic health in postmenopausal women, this intervention could be recommended in the prevention of osteoporosis and associated musculoskeletal and metabolic conditions.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPendulum WBF-038

All bacteria contained in Pendulum WBF-038 are commensal organisms that have been repeatedly documented to inhabit the human gastrointestinal tract under normal circumstances. Pendulum's WBF-038 is a proprietary formulation of the following strains: Akkermansia muciniphila, Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium beijerinckii, Anaerobutyricum hallii, Bifidobacterium infantis, plus chicory inulin and magnesium stearate. The organisms were grown under controlled conditions consistent with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and employ no animal-derived products. All ingredients utilized during manufacturing were food grade and qualified as generally recognized as safe (GRAS). The product is provided as acid-resistant capsules in bottles that are to be stored refrigerated at 4℃.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPendulum Placebo

Pendulum placebo capsules containing magnesium stearate

Sponsors

Pendulum Therapeutics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Curtin University
CollaboratorOTHER
Australian Catholic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blinded

Intervention model description

Randomized placebo-controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Postmenopausal women, 40-65 years old * Caucasian (due to significant differences in BMD and bone remodelling between ethnicities) * At least one year since final menses * Signed informed consent * Up to date Covid 19 vaccination status * Able to walk without the use of an aid * Stated availability throughout the entire study period * Mental capacity to understand and willingness to fulfil all the details of the protocol * Residing in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of osteoporosis * T-score of -2.5 or less at the femoral neck or lumbar spine (L1-L4) on the DXA scan at screening visit * HbA1c ≥6.5% at screening visit * Blood pressure at screening visit of systolic \>180 mmHg and/or diastolic \>120 mmHg * Untreated hyperthyroidism * Rheumatoid arthritis * Diagnosed with a disease-causing secondary osteoporosis or malabsorption: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, type 1/type 2 diabetes, or chronic liver disease * Bariatric surgery * Recently diagnosed malignancy (within the last 5 years) * Current or recent oral corticosteroid use (any dose within the last 3 months, or 5mg of Prednisolone (or equivalent) or a higher daily dose for 14 days or more 3-12 months prior to screening) * Use of antiresorptive therapy, including systemic hormone replacement therapy, bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate (current or during the last 3 years) * Use of teriparatide (current or during the last 3 years) * Participation in other clinical intervention trials * Antibiotics treatment 2 months prior to inclusion * Unwilling to cease taking other probiotic or prebiotic supplements (current use)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total volumetric bone mineral density of the distal tibia12 monthsPercentage change in total volumetric bone density measured using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) of the distal tibia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone mineral density of the hip12 monthsRelative change in total hip BMD measured using DXA
Tibia and radius trabecular bone volume12 monthsRelative change in tibia and radius trabecular bone volume fraction measured using HR-pQCT
Tibia and radius cortical area12 monthsRelative change in tibia and radius cortical area measured using HR-pQCT
Tibia and radius cortical volumetric bone mineral density12 monthsRelative change in tibia and radius cortical volumetric BMD measured using HR-pQCT
Total volumetric bone mineral density of the distal radius12 monthsRelative change in total volumetric BMD of the distal radius measured using HRpQCT
Serum C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (ßCTX-I) - bone turnover marker6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in ßCTX-I in serum
Serum procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) - bone turnover marker6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in P1NP levels in serum
Serum osteocalcin (OC) - bone turnover marker6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in OC in serum
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)6 months, 12 months, and 2 weeks post interventionRelative change in SCFA levels (including butyrate) in stool
16s rRNA genetic sequencing of the gut microbiota6 months, 12 months, and 2 weeks post interventionRelative change in species-level gut microbiota composition in stool using 16s rRNA sequencing
Fasting blood glucose6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in fasted blood glucose levels in circulating blood
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in HbA1c levels in circulating blood
Lower leg muscle area12 monthsRelative change in lower leg muscle area measured using HR-pQCT
Lean body mass12 monthsRelative change in appendicular lean body mass measured using DXA
Grip strength6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in left and right hand grip strength measured using a hand dynamometer
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in hs-CRP levels in serum
Regulatory T lymphocytes (Tregs)12 monthsRelative change in circulating number of Tregs in blood
Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in oral glucose tolerance in circulating blood
Muscle tissue glycogen content6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in muscle tissue glycogen content obtained from a muscle biopsy
Muscle tissue triglyceride content6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in muscle tissue triglyceride content obtained from a muscle biopsy
Muscle tissue type 1 fibre composition6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in muscle tissue type 1 fibre proportion obtained from a muscle biopsy
Lipocalin26 months, 12 months, and 2 weeks post interventionRelative change in Lipocalin2 (intestinal inflammation) in stool
Cogstate One back Test Cognitive performance test6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in speed of performance and number of errors in the One Back Test using the Cogstate cognitive assessment tool. Lower score = better performance
Cogstate Groton Maze Learning Test Cognitive performance test6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in number of errors in the Groton Maze Learning Test using the Cogstate cognitive assessment tool. Lower score = better performance
Cogstate Continuous Paired Associate Learning Test Cognitive performance test6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in accuracy of performance and number of errors in the Continuous Paired Associate Learning Test using the Cogstate cognitive assessment tool. Lower score = better performance
Cogstate Social Emotional Cognition Test Cognitive performance test6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in accuracy of performance in the Social Emotional Cognition Test using the Cogstate cognitive assessment tool. Higher score = better performance
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 216 months and 12 monthsRelative change in depression, anxiety and stress measured using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) questionnaire. The DASS-21 has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 63 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in gastrointestinal symptoms measured using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. The GSRS has a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 45 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Plasma glucagon-like peptide 16 months and 12 monthsRelative change in gut hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 \[GLP-1\] in plasma
Plasma peptide tyrosine-tyrosine6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in gut hormone peptide tyrosine-tyrosine \[PYY\] in plasma
Plasma adiponectin6 months and 12 monthsRelative change adiponectin in plasma
EuroQol Five Dimensions Quality of life Medical Outcome Survey6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in quality of life measured using the EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire. The EQ-5D has a minimum score of Level 1 and a maximum score of Level 5 with higher levels indicating a worse outcome
Social Interaction Anxiety Scale6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in social anxiety measured using the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS) questionnaire. The SIAS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 80 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in mental wellbeing measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) questionnaire. The WEMWBS has a minimum score of 14 and a maximum score of 70 with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Continuous blood glucose level monitoring for 10 days6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in blood glucose (area under the curve) over 10 days measured using a continuous glucose monitoring device
Fasting blood insulin6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in fasted blood insulin levels in circulating blood
Fat mass12 monthsRelative change in total body fat mass measured using DXA
Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine12 monthsRelative change in lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Office blood pressure6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure measured using a sphygmomanometer
The Visual Analogue Scale Pain Intensity6 months and 12 monthsRelative change in current pain intensity measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity scale. The VAS has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10 with higher scores indicating a worse outcome.
Calprotectin6 months, 12 months, and 2 weeks post interventionRelative change in calprotectin (intestinal inflammation) in stool
Muscle mass12 monthsRelative change in total body muscle mass measured using DXA
Blood metabolomics12 monthsRelative change in blood metabolites using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026