Skip to content

Assessment of Decision Support System Software in Extraction and Anchorage Planning Among Adult Patients Using Computer Algorithm

Assessment of Decision Support System Software in Extraction and Anchorage Planning Among Adult Patients Using Computer Algorithm

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05348109
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-04-27
Start date
2022-08-22
Completion date
2023-04-30
Last updated
2022-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anchorage Planning, Cases That Need Extraction of Teeth in Orthodontics

Brief summary

It was introduced in dentistry to be used in innovative research and development in addition to facilitating the decision in complicated cases and ensure high patient care quality. In the field of Orthodontics in specific, many studies previously mentioned the idea of artificial intelligence showing very promising results and high degree of reliability. It was used in different domains in orthodontics like diagnosis, treatment planning, evaluation of treatment outcome

Detailed description

In this study, the aim is to access the efficiency of the new decision support system in determining whether the decision is extraction or non-extraction and the anchorage plan required for each case. This was performed in the past in many countries and those studies are published

Interventions

OTHERWell finished cases

To decide whether extraction or non-extraction decision will be made for each case

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

1. Cases with well finished orthodontic treatment. 2. Cases with history of crowding more than 10 mm and requiring extraction. 3. Cases with no severe skeletal discrepancy. 4. Well documented cases with both pre-operative and post-operative records. 5. Patients with a full set of permanent teeth erupted

Exclusion criteria

1. Improperly finished orthodontic cases. 2. Cases with mild crowding managed by treatment options other than extraction. 3. Growing patients or showing any residual growth remaining in cephalometric analysis 4. Cases with severe skeletal discrepancy. 5. Poorly documented cases. 6. Patients not sticking to anchorage plan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To study the efficiency of the program decisions in terms of extraction/non-extraction and Anchorage planning decisions1 yearThe concordance correlation coefficient would be used to measure the agreement between the 2 methods on the basis of the values (%) assigned for each treatment option by the 2 methods (quantitative data).

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactWalaa Mohamed Gadallah, Bachelor degree
walaa.hassan@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01021340189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026