Skip to content

Frequency of Hyperparathyroidism in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Its Treatment

Resolution of Hyperparathyroidism With High-dose Vitamin D Improves Osteoporosis in Multi-treated Postmenopausal Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05347082
Enrollment
47
Registered
2022-04-26
Start date
2021-04-29
Completion date
2022-02-20
Last updated
2022-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperparathyroidism, Primary, Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, Hypovitaminosis D, Postmenopausal Osteoporosis, Postmenopause

Keywords

Vitamin D, Postmenopause, Osteopenia, Osteoporosis, Bone Mineral Density, Hyperparathyroidism

Brief summary

Recently, an increase in the prevalence of hyperparathyroidism and hypovitaminosis D in postmenopause women has been occurring in Mexico and the world. Chronic exposure to the parathyroid hormone (PTH) is catabolic for the bone, worsening the state of osteoporosis. However, it is unclear whether these conditions could significantly improve bone mineral density (BMD). In the present work, it was shown that the resolution of hyperparathyroidism in postmenopausal women improves osteoporosis.

Detailed description

This study was an open clinical trial conducted in Mexican women diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis and hyperparathyroidism associated or not with hypovitaminosis D from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital 1o de Octubre of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE). An integral clinical evaluation with PTH and vitamin D measurement was first done to determine the frequency of primary hyperparathyroidism and hypovitaminosis D. Likewise, a thyroid ultrasound was done. Then, 8000 IU of vitamin D were orally administrated for four weeks. Statical analysis was performed using PAST 3.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. software. The arithmetic median (µ) and standard deviation (S.D.) were calculated using Excel-Word. Graphics were constructed with GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 and tables with Excel-Word. Categorical variables were analysed with chi-squared or Fisher exact test depending on the number of participants in each cell. Normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare two paired samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized. To perform correlations, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used. The assigned α value for this study was \<0.05. In all cases, if a Montecarlo permutation was available, the exact p-value was taken instead of the raw p-value.

Interventions

DRUGCholecalciferol

Tablets of 4000 IU

Sponsors

Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER
National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

47 participants who met the inclusion criteria were included and all received 8000 IU of vitamin D orally for four weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Acceptance to participate in the study with informed consent. * Postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteopenia. * Primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism. * Insufficiency or deficiency of vitamin D. * Multi-treated postmenopausal osteoporosis. * Postmenopausal osteoporosis without treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Different osteoporosis aetiology not related to oestrogenic deficiency. * Thyroid pathology. * Previous treatment with vitamin D, thiazide diuretics, lithium, Teriparatide or glucocorticoids. * Known allergies to vitamin D. * Addison's disease, pheochromocytoma, and depressive disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Remission of Hyperparathyroidism4 weeksClinical remission of hyperparathyroidism was evaluated after treatment.
Number of Participants with Remission of Hypovitaminosis D4 weeks.Clinical remission of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency were evaluated after treatment.
Change from baseline hip T score at 4 weeks4 weeksOsteoporosis in the hip was determined by a T score greater than -2.5 and osteopenia was determined by a T score between -1 to -2.4.
Change from baseline lumbar spine T score at 4 weeks4 weeksOsteoporosis in the lumbar spine was determined by a T-score greater than -2.5 and osteopenia was determined by a T-score between -1 and -2.4.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline general T score at 4 weeks4 weeksOsteoporosis was determined by a T-score greater than -2.5 either in the hip or in the lumbar spine and osteopenia was determined by a T-score between -1 and -2.4 either in the hip or in the lumbar spine.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026