Skip to content

Occlusal Contact Trueness Affected by Six Chairside CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials

Quantitative Clinical Evaluation of the Occlusal Contact Trueness Affected by Six Chairside CAD/CAM Ceramic Materials:a Self-control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05346744
Enrollment
10
Registered
2022-04-26
Start date
2019-11-01
Completion date
2021-08-01
Last updated
2022-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Defect

Keywords

chairside CAD/CAM, ceramic materials, trueness, occlusal contact

Brief summary

The aim of this clinic self-control study was to evaluate the trueness of occlusal contact affected by six ceramic materials during chairside fabricating process and offer recommendations for occlusal offset according to different ceramic materials in CEREC CAD/CAM design process.

Detailed description

Ten participants were selected for this study. InCoris TZl(ZIR), Celtra Duo(CD), IPS e.max(EMA), UPCERA LICI (LC), Vita enamic(ENA), UPCERA RUNCI (RC) were used to produce crowns for everyone by CEREC chairside CAD/CAM system. The milling trueness, postprocessing trueness and clinical adjustment of occlusal contact were quantitatively analyzed by the ATOS high-precision scanner and Geomagic reverse engineering software.

Interventions

OTHERChairside CAD/CAM ceramic materials for dental restoration

6 crowns made from 6 chairside ceramic materials were milled by CEREC MCXL-EF mode for mandibular first molar of each participant. The six materials are as follows: ZIR: InCoris TZI (Dentsply Sirona, York, PA), CD: Celtra Duo (Dentsply Sirona, York, PA), EMA: e.max CAD (ivoclar, Vivadent AG), LC: LiCi (UPCERA, China), ENA: Vita Enamic (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) RC: RunCi (UPCERA, China)

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Care providers and outcomes assessors wouldn't know the materials of the specimen.

Intervention model description

Ten individuals with tooth defect of mandibular first molar were selected to participate in the study. 6 crowns made from 6 chairside materials were milled by CEREC MCXL-EF mode for each mandibular first molar.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. with one mandibular first molar requiring crown restoration that have undergone root canal treatment; 2. with complete permanent dentition;

Exclusion criteria

1. with carious lesions, abrasions, attrition, erosions or any kind of tooth defects; 2. with any kind of restorations in occlusal surfaces; 3. with any sign of temporomandibular dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
milling trueness(μm)1 weekthe absolute 3D deviation of occlusal contact points before and after milling
postprocessing trueness(μm)1 weekthe absolute 3D deviation of occlusal contact points before and after postprocessing
clinical trueness(μm)1 weekthe absolute 3D deviation of occlusal contact points before and after occlusal adjustment

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026