Skip to content

Augmenting Gait in a Population Exhibiting Foot Drop With Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation

Augmenting Gait in a Population Exhibiting Foot Drop With Adaptive Functional Electrical Stimulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05346640
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-04-26
Start date
2021-06-08
Completion date
2022-02-25
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Foot Drop

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of personalized, adaptive, current-steering functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the lower leg to improve gait in people with foot drop.

Detailed description

Adaptive, current-steering FES enables precise control over dorsiflexor and evertor muscles, allowing for personalized treatment to correct key foot drop characteristics including dorsiflexion at heel strike and ankle inversion during swing phase. All participants will receive adaptive FES of the dorsiflexors and evertors during back-to-back walking sets. Participants completed up to three walking sets of unstimulated walking (pre-test) followed by lower-leg stimulated walking (post-test). The primary outcome measures include ankle dorsiflexion at heel strike and mean ankle inversion during swing phase. Secondary outcome measures include foot angle at heel strike and single-side heel strike to toe strike time (heel-toe time).

Interventions

DEVICECionic Neural Sleeve

Adaptive, functional electrical stimulation

Sponsors

Cionic, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A one-group, pre-test post-test study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18-70 * Lower extremity impairment that makes walking difficult or uncomfortable * Capable of sitting, standing, and walking independently or with assistance * Able to walk at least 50 feet independently or with assistance * Able to understand and follow basic instructions in English

Exclusion criteria

* Have non-reversible damage to the peripheral nervous system * Have underlying pre-existing conditions like thrombosis/hemorrhage, severe epilepsy or other seizure disorder, severe atrophy or history of implanted electrical devices * Have cognitive impairment that would prevent you from fully understanding the study and ability to provide informed consent * Have lower motor neuron disease or injury that may impair response to stimulation * Are pregnant * Are under the age of 18 years old * Have skin conditions of the affected lower limb, including cuts, burns or lesions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Dorsiflexion at Heel Strike60 minutesDorsiflexion measured via inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Heel strike is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe.
Mean Ankle Inversion During Swing Phase60 minutesAnkle inversion measured via IMU sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Swing phase is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Foot Angle at Heel Strike60 minutesFoot angle measured via IMU sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Heel strike is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe.
Mean Heel-Toe Time as a Percent of Gait Cycle60 minutesTime of heel-toe, or single-side heel strike to toe strike measured by percent of gait, where 0% represents heel strike and 100% is the next heel strike. Heel strike assessed by pressure sensors placed in the shoe.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot Drop
Comparison of kinematics in stimulated and unstimulated gait using functional electrical stimulation in individuals with foot drop as a result of a neurological dysfunction
32
Total32

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14
Overall StudyOther Reason3
Overall StudyPhysiological Complications3
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFunctional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot Drop
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
Age, Customized
30-39 years
2 Participants
Age, Customized
40-49 years
3 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
10 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
11 Participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
5 Participants
Age, Customized
80-89 years
1 Participants
Diagnosis
Cerebral Palsy
1 Participants
Diagnosis
Idiopathic
1 Participants
Diagnosis
Multiple Sclerosis
8 Participants
Diagnosis
Spinal Injury
2 Participants
Diagnosis
Stroke
20 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Ankle Inversion During Swing Phase

Ankle inversion measured via IMU sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Swing phase is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot DropMean Ankle Inversion During Swing Phase-3.6 degrees
Primary

Mean Dorsiflexion at Heel Strike

Dorsiflexion measured via inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Heel strike is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe.

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot DropMean Dorsiflexion at Heel Strike5.2 degrees
Secondary

Mean Foot Angle at Heel Strike

Foot angle measured via IMU sensors placed on the foot and lower leg, measured in degrees. Heel strike is determined from pressure sensors in the shoe.

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot DropMean Foot Angle at Heel Strike5.5 degrees
Secondary

Mean Heel-Toe Time as a Percent of Gait Cycle

Time of heel-toe, or single-side heel strike to toe strike measured by percent of gait, where 0% represents heel strike and 100% is the next heel strike. Heel strike assessed by pressure sensors placed in the shoe.

Time frame: 60 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Foot DropMean Heel-Toe Time as a Percent of Gait Cycle3.4 percentage of gait cycle

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026